Google Exec Decries Trump’s Election: ‘How Do We Prevent It from Happening Again’ - "They can pressure us but we’re not changing," claims Google as they double-down on seditious strategy for election interference.

(backup video)

Project Veritas - Google Exec Decries Trump's Election: 'How Do We Prevent It from Happening Again' | Breitbart

Undercover videos recorded by Project Veritas reveals that Google is determined to prevent the re-election of Donald Trump in 2020, and is altering its products with this aim in mind.

www.breitbart.com

Project Veritas - Google Exec Decries Trump's Election: 'How Do We Prevent It from Happening Again' | Breitbart
Allum Bokhari



Undercover videos recorded by Project Veritas reveals that Google is determined to prevent the re-election of Donald Trump in 2020, and is altering its products with this aim in mind.
The report includes undercover footage featuring a top Google executive, Jen Gennai, discussing how Google might prevent an electoral outcome like 2016 from happening again.



Here’s what Gennai says in the undercover video:

We all got screwed over in 2016, again it wasn’t just us, it was, the people got screwed over, the news media got screwed over, like, everybody got screwed over so we’re rapidly been like, happened there and how do we prevent it from happening again.
We’re also training our algorithms, like, if 2016 happened again, would we have, would the outcome be different?

Gennai also declares her opposition to Democrat presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren’s proposal to break up Google. Why? Because, says Gennai, if Google is broken up it can’t prevent another “Trump situation.”

Elizabeth Warren is saying we should break up Google. And like, I love her but she’s very misguided, like that will not make it better it will make it worse, because all these smaller companies who don’t have the same resources that we do will be charged with preventing the next Trump situation, it’s like a small company cannot do that.

Gennai also declared that no amount of soft pressure from Congress or the White House will make Google change its ways. In other words, talk won’t help — if politicians want to change Google’s behavior, they’ll have to go beyond committee hearings and actually change the law.

We got called in front of Congress multiple times, so we’ve not shown up because we know that they’re just going to attack us. We’re not going to change our, we’re not going to change our mind. There’s no use sitting there being attacked over something we know we’re not going to change. They can pressure us but we’re not changing. But we also have to be aware of what they’re doing and what they’re accusing us of.

According to her professional profile, Gennai works on “responsible innovation” in the Global Affairs division of Google — the same division run by Kent Walker, the Google VP who has declared his intention to make the populist-nationalist movement represented by Donald Trump a “blip” or “hiccup” in history, which he said “bends towards progress.”

Walker made these statements just days after the 2016 election, in a confidential video recording that was leaked to Breitbart News.

Google Insider to Project Veritas: YouTube Deliberately Suppresses PragerU, Dave Rubin, Tim Pool | Breitbart

A Google insider who spoke anonymously to Project Veritas claims that Google-owned video platform YouTube is discriminating against creators who do not meet the tech giant's political criteria.

www.breitbart.com

Google Insider to Project Veritas: YouTube Deliberately Suppresses PragerU, Dave Rubin, Tim Pool | Breitbart
Allum Bokhari


A Google insider who spoke anonymously to Project Veritas claims that Google-owned video platform YouTube is discriminating against creators who do not meet the tech giant’s political criteria.

The insider explained that Google and YouTube use terms like “machine learning fairness” to give a sheen of neutrality to their efforts to suppress content that might contradict progressive narratives.

He also claimed that their efforts now extend beyond conservatives to non-partisan commentators who critique the left as well as the right, like independent journalist Tim Pool.

Via Project Veritas’ interview with the insider:

…They described that they were going to have more content filtering, and right after that happened a lot of the content creators started to get demonetized, and their videos started to get deranked. I’m talking about Dave Rubin, I’m talking about Carpe Diem, I’m talking about Tim Pool, and a lot of the other content creators that are within YouTube ecosystem just saw their, their view counts just go through the floor.
So, Google is targeting what they consider rightwing news commentators so that includes Tim Pool, Dave Rubin, Steven Crowder, and a host of other right wing people that they are coming in and they’re deciding that they don’t want these opinions to have a wide appeal. And so they’re coming in and they’re putting their thumb down, and they’re deciding which content the users are allowed to see.

They’re playing narrative control. And what they’re doing it is they’re applying their human, the human component, which is they’re going through – with an army people – and they are manually intervening, and removing your content from, from their servers, and they are saying that the algorithms did it. And in that case for the high profile people, it’s not just ML Fairness that you guys have to worry about, it’s actual people that have their head filled with this SJW mindset, they’re going through and removing the content because it – because they don’t agree with it.

Watch the full interview below:

Project Veritas also obtained undercover footage revealing yet another Google executive declaring the company’s intention to intervene in its products to stop Trump in 2020. “Responsible innovation” head Jen Gennai was recorded stating that Google shouldn’t be broken up because smaller companies couldn’t prevent “another Trump situation.”

Insider Blows Whistle & Exec Reveals Google Plan to Prevent “Trump situation” in 2020 on Hidden Cam

(New York City) — Project Veritas has released a new report on Google which includes undercover video of a Senior Google Executive, leaked documents, and testimony from a Google insider.

www.projectveritas.com

Insider Blows Whistle & Exec Reveals Google Plan to Prevent “Trump situation” in 2020 on Hidden Cam

Insider: Google “is bent on never letting somebody like Donald Trump come to power again.”
Google Head of Responsible Innovation Says Elizabeth Warren “misguided” on “breaking up Google”
Google Exec Says Don’t Break Us Up: “smaller companies don’t have the resources” to “prevent next Trump situation”
Insider Says PragerU And Dave Rubin Content Suppressed, Targeted As “Right-Wing”
LEAKED Documents Highlight “Machine Learning Fairness” and Google’s Practices to Make Search Results “fair and equitable”
Documents Appear to Show “Editorial” Policies That Determine How Google Publishes News
Insider: Google Violates “letter of the law” and “spirit of the law” on Section 230


(New York City) — Project Veritas has released a new report on Google which includes undercover video of a Senior Google Executive, leaked documents, and testimony from a Google insider. The report appears to show Google’s plans to affect the outcome of the 2020 elections and “prevent” the next “Trump situation.”

The report includes undercover footage of longtime Google employee and Head of Responsible Innovation, Jen Gennai saying:

“Elizabeth Warren is saying we should break up Google. And like, I love her but she’s very misguided, like that will not make it better it will make it worse, because all these smaller companies who don’t have the same resources that we do will be charged with preventing the next Trump situation, it’s like a small company cannot do that.”

Said Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe:

“This is the third tech insider who has bravely stepped forward to expose the secrets of Silicon Valley. These new documents, supported by undercover video, raise questions of Google’s neutrality and the role they see themselves fulfilling in the 2020 elections.”

Jen Gennai is the head of “Responsible Innovation” for Google, a sector that monitors and evaluates the responsible implementation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies. In the video, Gennai says Google has been working diligently to “prevent” the results of the 2016 election from repeating in 2020:

“We all got screwed over in 2016, again it wasn’t just us, it was, the people got screwed over, the news media got screwed over, like, everybody got screwed over so we’re rapidly been like, what happened there and how do we prevent it from happening again.”
“We’re also training our algorithms, like, if 2016 happened again, would we have, would the outcome be different?”

Google: Artificial Intelligence Is For A “fair and equitable” State

According to the insider, Machine Learning Fairness is one of the many tools Google uses to promote a political agenda. Documents leaked by a Google informant elaborate on Machine Learning Fairness and the “algorithmic unfairness” that AI product intervention aims to solve:



The insider showed Google search examples that show Machine Learning Fairness in action.



“The reason we launched our A.I. principles is because people were not putting that line in the sand, that they were not saying what’s fair and what’s equitable so we’re like, well we are a big company, we’re going to say it.” – Jen Gennai, Head Of Responsible Innovation, Google

The Google insider explained the impact of artificial intelligence and Machine Learning Fairness:

“They’re going to redefine a reality based on what they think is fair and based upon what they want, and what and is part of their agenda.”

Determining credible news and an editorial agenda. . .

Additional leaked documents detail how Google defines and prioritizes content from different news publishers and how its products feature that content. One document, called the “Fake News-letter” explains Google’s goal to have a “single point of truth” across their products.



Another document received by Project Veritas explains the “News Ecosystem” which mentions “editorial guidelines” that appear to be determined and administered internally by Google. These guidelines control how content is distributed and displayed on their site.



The leaked documents appear to show that Google makes news decisions about what news they promote and distribute on their site.

Comments made by Gennai raise similar questions. In a conversation with Veritas journalists, Gennai explains that “conservative sources” and “credible sources” don’t always coincide according to Google’s editorial practices.

“We have gotten accusations of around fairness is that we’re unfair to conservatives because we’re choosing what we find as credible news sources and those sources don’t necessarily overlap with conservative sources …”

The insider shed additional light on how YouTube demotes content from influencers like Dave Rubin and Tim Pool:

“What YouTube did is they changed the results of the recommendation engine. And so what the recommendation engine is it tries to do, is it tries to say, well, if you like A, then you’re probably going to like B. So content that is similar to Dave Rubin or Tim Pool, instead of listing Dave Rubin or Tim Pool as people that you might like, what they’re doing is that they’re trying to suggest different, different news outlets, for example, like CNN, or MSNBC, or these left leaning political outlets.”

Internal Google Document: “People Like Us Are Programmed”

An additional document Project Veritas obtained, titled “Fair is Not the Default” says “People (like us) are programmed” after the results of machine learning fairness. The document describes how “unconscious bias” and algorithms interact.



Veritas is the “Only Way”

Said the insider:

“The reason why I came to Project Veritas is that you’re the only one I trust to be able to be a real investigative journalist. Investigative journalist is a dead career option, but somehow, you’ve been able to make it work. And because of that I came to Project Veritas because I knew that this was the only way that this story would be able to get out to the public.”
“I mean, this is a behemoth, this is a Goliath, I am but a David trying to say that the emperor has no clothes. And, um, being a small little ant I can be crushed, and I am aware of that. But, this is something that is bigger than me, this is something that needs to be said to the American public.”

Project Veritas intends to continue investigating abuses in big tech companies and encourages more Silicon Valley insiders to share their stories through their Be Brave campaign.

As of publishing, Google did not respond to Project Veritas’ request for comment. Additional leaked Google documents can be viewed HERE.

 

[qu_rahn]

Anyone got a good Gmail alternative?

 

[Malagor the dank omen]

Anyone got a good Gmail alternative?

Use regular mail. The postman has a family to feed too.

 

[tehpope]

Anyone got a good Gmail alternative?

Best Secure Email Providers for Privacy | privacytools.io

Find a secure email provider that will keep your privacy in mind. Don't settle for ad-supported platforms. Never trust any company with your privacy, always encrypt.

privacytools.io

 

[GrungyLawnChlorinate]

https://twitter.com/Project_Veritas/status/1143242996504244224

 

[Gustav Schuchardt]

This is so deliberate it makes me think that Google wants to be punished.

I reckon Facebook, Google and the rest of the companies run by leftists in CA and NY like see it like this.

Either

1) There's no regulation. In which case they'll get rid of all the conservative voices, promote all the left wing ones and hopefully swing elections for the Dems.

Or

2) There is regulation. However once the Dems get in again, they'll use that precedent to have their own regulation which will get rid of all the conservative voices, promote all the left wing ones and swing elections for the Dems. As is traditional regulation benefits incumbents and cripples new entrants.

All that being said I think the Josh Hawley bill which would remove CDA 230 protections for large, non politically neutral companies is worth a try. All those tech companies can either by platforms that allow any legal speech and get CDA 230 protection or they can be publishers that exercise editorial control but don't get that protection.

The interesting thing is that CDA 230 has already being weakened by FOSTA-SESTA. A lot of people on the left hate those tech companies too and blame them for Trump, Russian meddling etc.

And hey, the Democrats tried to push a completely disingenuous version of Net Neutrality which they defined narrowly in terms of routing packets but specifically excluded platforms banning views which is the only kind of neutrality anyone gives a shit about. Maybe the GOP should brand Hawley's proposal as Net Neutrality.

Politics is about stealing your opponents slogans and inverting them. Trump showed that when he turned accusations of 'fake news' directed at right wing outlets back on people like CNN. The left are past masters at it, and the right should fight fire with fire.

Incidentally the Democrat version of Net Neutrality was supposed to stop things like Zero Rating, except it didn't because Obama FCC appointee ruled that BingeOn was kosher. Also Facebook, one of the companies demanding Net Neutrality had an Internet service in India that violated NN too. Basically the Dem version of NN just meant that Facebook, Google etc had to pay ISPs a bit less for the bandwidth. All of the other shittyness of the Internet - non content neutral platforms, and ISP monopolies - would stay.

I'd say the GOP version should be aimed at social media companies, not ISPs. Oddly enough the social media companies tend to be run by/staffed by/donate to Democrats. The ISPs apparently donate to more to the GOP. So it fits with Trump's crony capitalist and tribal instincts to try to fuck over the former.

 

[Anonymous For This]

Alex Jones did nothing wrong.

 

[CrunkLord420]

Jen Gennai has deleted her twitter account: https://twitter.com/gennai_jen
Archives: https://archive.vn/https://twitter.com/gennai_jen*

 

[SmileyTimeDayCare]

I know Project Veritas is biased as all fuck, but listening to their expose is making me legit mad on the internet. Especially since its saying stuff everyone here has known for years.

All journalism is biased. It isn't the bias that makes CNN, MSNBC, WaPo, NYT, etc fake news. It is their tactics. NYT likes to throw a lot of ink to hide the fact that their opinion pieces are just that--opinions. They'll take a five thousand word rant about Trump and slap Analysis on it with Opinion written in smaller letters off center where most people will take little note of it. WaPo is a little less guilty of this but they are doing it.

CNN and pals tend to lie through omission and implication constantly. Example of implication would be: Look, let's be clear, we know Trump didn't burn down that orphanage and then rape the orphans but he's a very bad man and does bad things all the time. They do this because they know what is going to carry through their gerbil brained audience is Trump raped orphans because he does bad things all the time.

MSNBC gave a lot of airtime to an obviously deranged and possibly demented woman who claimed Trump raped her at 53, had the outfit, isn't going to press charges or hand over the outfit to the authorities because women are getting raped in detention centers. A statement that wasn't challenged or followed up on because they know it is bullshit and it gets the implication out that Trump is a rapist and ICE is raping all of the detainees.

Faux does tend to warp facts a lot from what I've seen but I really hate everyone on Fox(and they lack entertainment value) so I can't really give recent examples.

PV's videos are consistently proven true regardless of their bias:

• NJ Teacher Union disciplined people over the videos.
• Voter fraud proven true.
• Twitter's behind the scenes shit proven true and Twitter modified how they were fucking with people.
• CNN's coverage of muh collusion being based on nothing holds up well.

As said at open: There's no such thing as non-biased journalism but that doesn't mean that it can't be free of deceit but pulling that off requires ethics and that isn't part of the game when there are twenty-four hours of content to produce on two hours of news.

 

[Gustav Schuchardt]

View attachment 813776

https://twitter.com/Project_Veritas/status/1143242996504244224

This is some great reporting. Pretty much everything I suspected about Google is true.

 

[TP 200]

Everyone's thinking about Trump's re-election attempt, but I can't imagine how fucked this country will be 4 years after, no matter whether he is re-elected or not.

All of these people and companies are going to drastic measures to fight one man and his supporters/anyone who isn't on their side, yet, when the smoke clears, everyone will see them as the corrupt fucks they are. Then, where does this country go from there?

 

[Sīn the Moon Daddy]

Everyone's thinking about Trump's re-election attempt, but I can't imagine how fucked this country will be 4 years after, no matter whether he is re-elected or not.

All of these people and companies are going to drastic measures to fight one man and his supporters/anyone who isn't on their side, yet, when the smoke clears, everyone will see them as the corrupt fucks they are. Then, where does this country go from there?

I genuinely don't know because I don't believe that people are going to want to leave their echo chambers even in the face of the absolute failure of their ideas.

I don't think they're going to use guns. They'll probably stick to bike locks and milkshakes.

 

[Kamov Ka-52]

Didn't all of this information already come out around the time of James Damore suit?

 

[Gustav Schuchardt]

All journalism is biased. It isn't the bias that makes CNN, MSNBC, WaPo, NYT, etc fake news. It is their tactics. NYT likes to throw a lot of ink to hide the fact that their opinion pieces are just that--opinions. They'll take a five thousand word rant about Trump and slap Analysis on it with Opinion written in smaller letters off center where most people will take little note of it. WaPo is a little less guilty of this but they are doing it.

I know everyone hear hates Ben Shapiro but he put it best when he said that the difference between The Daily Wire and CNN/MSNBC/WaPo/NYT etc is that The Daily Wire openly admits it is biased. All those Leftist sources claim to be objective and then have blatantly partisan 'fact checks' that always say politicians on their side are mostly telling the truth and politicians on the other side are mostly lying.

It all reminds me of this

Findings: - Everything2.com

Everything2 is a community for fiction, nonfiction, poetry, reviews, and more. Get writing help or enjoy nearly a half million pieces of original writing.

everything2.com

The left seem to believe they have access to absolute truth and anyone who disagrees is evil and or stupid, not merely wrong.

 

[Marissa Moira]

Atleast we know that voting actually works at this point since they're shooting themselves in the foot to try and stop it. This shit is going to be all over Fox news in about an hour when Tucker comes on.

 

[TP 200]

I genuinely don't know because I don't believe that people are going to want to leave their echo chambers even in the face of the absolute failure of their ideas.

I don't think they're going to use guns. They'll probably stick to bike locks and milkshakes.

People always want to expand their echo chambers, though, which is the real problem. I think these people will ramp up the violence in any way against those who aren't on their side, until we're in a state that nearly resembles China. Guns may not be involved, but I can see companies having extensive pull in the government, which will allow them to ruin livelihoods for good, and use the police for nefarious reasons. We already see how companies come together to make sure a specific person is banned from like 20 platforms for thinking wrongly, so I think it will get worse with time.

 

[Gustav Schuchardt]

People always want to expand their echo chambers, though, which is the real problem. I think these people will ramp up the violence in any way against those who aren't on their side, until we're in a state that nearly resembles China. Guns may not be involved, but I can see companies having extensive pull in the government, which will allow them to ruin livelihoods for good, and use the police for nefarious reasons. We already see how companies come together to make sure a specific person is banned from like 20 platforms for thinking wrongly, so I think it will get worse with time.

It's a shit situation, there's no doubt about. Still it could be worse. You could be in the UK. I think even the UK is less fucked than most of rest of Western Europe.

The weird thing about the US is that, because it already contains all the possible contradictions and forms of lunacy it's hard for any new contradiction or lunacy to have much of an impact and despite/because of all the chaos it's still a pretty dynamic place. As someone observed 'It's like how all the best bands did heroin'. The US is down with the sickness in a way the UK is not. And the France, Germany, Sweden etc are even worse.

 

[BarberFerdinand]

https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1143256992431136768

James O'Keefe on Twitter: "🚨DEVELOPING: We have received two YouTube…

archived 24 Jun 2019 20:52:39 UTC

archive.fo

Tried to download the video, but youtube-dlg isn't working even after updating.

 

[Marissa Moira]

https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1143256992431136768

James O'Keefe on Twitter: "🚨DEVELOPING: We have received two YouTube…

archived 24 Jun 2019 20:52:39 UTC

archive.fo

Tried to download the video, but youtube-dlg isn't working even after updating.

There's a bit.chute link

Veritas Visuals

Insider Blows Whistle & Exec Reveals Google Plan to Prevent "Trump situation" in 2020 on Hidden Cam

www.bitchute.com

 

[Trig.Point]

How long till all those affiliated with Project Veritas are not only completely shadow banned/blacklisted but also removed from social media?

I think James O' Keefe has been marked for deletion from social media for some time now, I have a theory that they'd ban some high profile alt right figure like Richard Spencer, who the media can focus on then put their actual targets ie people that actually matter like James O'Keefe on the same list.

He's doing the right thing by staying high profile, they'll find it harder to do it now without answering questions.

 

[Xarpho]

Makes me wonder if Google would want to cover up pro-Elizabeth Warren stuff since she's also out for Google's scalp. If it is "her turn" after 2020, the one thing I would want to see is to give Google the gutting it absolutely deserves.