Google Exec Decries Trump’s Election: ‘How Do We Prevent It from Happening Again’ - "They can pressure us but we’re not changing," claims Google as they double-down on seditious strategy for election interference.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
(backup video)

Project Veritas - Google Exec Decries Trump's Election: 'How Do We Prevent It from Happening Again' | Breitbart
Allum Bokhari

Google-exec-Jen-Gennai-1-640x480.jpg

Undercover videos recorded by Project Veritas reveals that Google is determined to prevent the re-election of Donald Trump in 2020, and is altering its products with this aim in mind.
The report includes undercover footage featuring a top Google executive, Jen Gennai, discussing how Google might prevent an electoral outcome like 2016 from happening again.



Here’s what Gennai says in the undercover video:
We all got screwed over in 2016, again it wasn’t just us, it was, the people got screwed over, the news media got screwed over, like, everybody got screwed over so we’re rapidly been like, happened there and how do we prevent it from happening again.
We’re also training our algorithms, like, if 2016 happened again, would we have, would the outcome be different?

Gennai also declares her opposition to Democrat presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren’s proposal to break up Google. Why? Because, says Gennai, if Google is broken up it can’t prevent another “Trump situation.”

Elizabeth Warren is saying we should break up Google. And like, I love her but she’s very misguided, like that will not make it better it will make it worse, because all these smaller companies who don’t have the same resources that we do will be charged with preventing the next Trump situation, it’s like a small company cannot do that.

Gennai also declared that no amount of soft pressure from Congress or the White House will make Google change its ways. In other words, talk won’t help — if politicians want to change Google’s behavior, they’ll have to go beyond committee hearings and actually change the law.

We got called in front of Congress multiple times, so we’ve not shown up because we know that they’re just going to attack us. We’re not going to change our, we’re not going to change our mind. There’s no use sitting there being attacked over something we know we’re not going to change. They can pressure us but we’re not changing. But we also have to be aware of what they’re doing and what they’re accusing us of.

According to her professional profile, Gennai works on “responsible innovation” in the Global Affairs division of Google — the same division run by Kent Walker, the Google VP who has declared his intention to make the populist-nationalist movement represented by Donald Trump a “blip” or “hiccup” in history, which he said “bends towards progress.”

Walker made these statements just days after the 2016 election, in a confidential video recording that was leaked to Breitbart News.


Google Insider to Project Veritas: YouTube Deliberately Suppresses PragerU, Dave Rubin, Tim Pool | Breitbart
Allum Bokhari


A Google insider who spoke anonymously to Project Veritas claims that Google-owned video platform YouTube is discriminating against creators who do not meet the tech giant’s political criteria.

The insider explained that Google and YouTube use terms like “machine learning fairness” to give a sheen of neutrality to their efforts to suppress content that might contradict progressive narratives.

He also claimed that their efforts now extend beyond conservatives to non-partisan commentators who critique the left as well as the right, like independent journalist Tim Pool.

Via Project Veritas’ interview with the insider:

…They described that they were going to have more content filtering, and right after that happened a lot of the content creators started to get demonetized, and their videos started to get deranked. I’m talking about Dave Rubin, I’m talking about Carpe Diem, I’m talking about Tim Pool, and a lot of the other content creators that are within YouTube ecosystem just saw their, their view counts just go through the floor.
So, Google is targeting what they consider rightwing news commentators so that includes Tim Pool, Dave Rubin, Steven Crowder, and a host of other right wing people that they are coming in and they’re deciding that they don’t want these opinions to have a wide appeal. And so they’re coming in and they’re putting their thumb down, and they’re deciding which content the users are allowed to see.

They’re playing narrative control. And what they’re doing it is they’re applying their human, the human component, which is they’re going through – with an army people – and they are manually intervening, and removing your content from, from their servers, and they are saying that the algorithms did it. And in that case for the high profile people, it’s not just ML Fairness that you guys have to worry about, it’s actual people that have their head filled with this SJW mindset, they’re going through and removing the content because it – because they don’t agree with it.

Watch the full interview below:

Project Veritas also obtained undercover footage revealing yet another Google executive declaring the company’s intention to intervene in its products to stop Trump in 2020. “Responsible innovation” head Jen Gennai was recorded stating that Google shouldn’t be broken up because smaller companies couldn’t prevent “another Trump situation.”


Insider Blows Whistle & Exec Reveals Google Plan to Prevent “Trump situation” in 2020 on Hidden Cam

Insider: Google “is bent on never letting somebody like Donald Trump come to power again.”
Google Head of Responsible Innovation Says Elizabeth Warren “misguided” on “breaking up Google”
Google Exec Says Don’t Break Us Up: “smaller companies don’t have the resources” to “prevent next Trump situation”
Insider Says PragerU And Dave Rubin Content Suppressed, Targeted As “Right-Wing”
LEAKED Documents Highlight “Machine Learning Fairness” and Google’s Practices to Make Search Results “fair and equitable”
Documents Appear to Show “Editorial” Policies That Determine How Google Publishes News
Insider: Google Violates “letter of the law” and “spirit of the law” on Section 230



(New York City) — Project Veritas has released a new report on Google which includes undercover video of a Senior Google Executive, leaked documents, and testimony from a Google insider. The report appears to show Google’s plans to affect the outcome of the 2020 elections and “prevent” the next “Trump situation.”

The report includes undercover footage of longtime Google employee and Head of Responsible Innovation, Jen Gennai saying:

“Elizabeth Warren is saying we should break up Google. And like, I love her but she’s very misguided, like that will not make it better it will make it worse, because all these smaller companies who don’t have the same resources that we do will be charged with preventing the next Trump situation, it’s like a small company cannot do that.”

Screen-Shot-2019-06-23-at-10.32.40-PM.png
Said Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe:

“This is the third tech insider who has bravely stepped forward to expose the secrets of Silicon Valley. These new documents, supported by undercover video, raise questions of Google’s neutrality and the role they see themselves fulfilling in the 2020 elections.”
Jen Gennai is the head of “Responsible Innovation” for Google, a sector that monitors and evaluates the responsible implementation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies. In the video, Gennai says Google has been working diligently to “prevent” the results of the 2016 election from repeating in 2020:

“We all got screwed over in 2016, again it wasn’t just us, it was, the people got screwed over, the news media got screwed over, like, everybody got screwed over so we’re rapidly been like, what happened there and how do we prevent it from happening again.”
“We’re also training our algorithms, like, if 2016 happened again, would we have, would the outcome be different?”
Google: Artificial Intelligence Is For A “fair and equitable” State

According to the insider, Machine Learning Fairness is one of the many tools Google uses to promote a political agenda. Documents leaked by a Google informant elaborate on Machine Learning Fairness and the “algorithmic unfairness” that AI product intervention aims to solve:

Screen-Shot-2019-06-23-at-10.35.03-PM.png Screen-Shot-2019-06-23-at-10.37.28-PM.png

The insider showed Google search examples that show Machine Learning Fairness in action.

Screen-Shot-2019-06-21-at-3.13.29-PM.png

“The reason we launched our A.I. principles is because people were not putting that line in the sand, that they were not saying what’s fair and what’s equitable so we’re like, well we are a big company, we’re going to say it.” – Jen Gennai, Head Of Responsible Innovation, Google

The Google insider explained the impact of artificial intelligence and Machine Learning Fairness:

“They’re going to redefine a reality based on what they think is fair and based upon what they want, and what and is part of their agenda.”
Determining credible news and an editorial agenda. . .

Additional leaked documents detail how Google defines and prioritizes content from different news publishers and how its products feature that content. One document, called the “Fake News-letter” explains Google’s goal to have a “single point of truth” across their products.

Screen-Shot-2019-06-23-at-10.40.03-PM.png

Another document received by Project Veritas explains the “News Ecosystem” which mentions “editorial guidelines” that appear to be determined and administered internally by Google. These guidelines control how content is distributed and displayed on their site.

Screen-Shot-2019-06-23-at-10.41.14-PM.png

The leaked documents appear to show that Google makes news decisions about what news they promote and distribute on their site.

Comments made by Gennai raise similar questions. In a conversation with Veritas journalists, Gennai explains that “conservative sources” and “credible sources” don’t always coincide according to Google’s editorial practices.

“We have gotten accusations of around fairness is that we’re unfair to conservatives because we’re choosing what we find as credible news sources and those sources don’t necessarily overlap with conservative sources …”
The insider shed additional light on how YouTube demotes content from influencers like Dave Rubin and Tim Pool:

“What YouTube did is they changed the results of the recommendation engine. And so what the recommendation engine is it tries to do, is it tries to say, well, if you like A, then you’re probably going to like B. So content that is similar to Dave Rubin or Tim Pool, instead of listing Dave Rubin or Tim Pool as people that you might like, what they’re doing is that they’re trying to suggest different, different news outlets, for example, like CNN, or MSNBC, or these left leaning political outlets.”
Internal Google Document: “People Like Us Are Programmed”

An additional document Project Veritas obtained, titled “Fair is Not the Default” says “People (like us) are programmed” after the results of machine learning fairness. The document describes how “unconscious bias” and algorithms interact.

Screen-Shot-2019-06-23-at-10.43.08-PM.png

Veritas is the “Only Way”

Said the insider:


“The reason why I came to Project Veritas is that you’re the only one I trust to be able to be a real investigative journalist. Investigative journalist is a dead career option, but somehow, you’ve been able to make it work. And because of that I came to Project Veritas because I knew that this was the only way that this story would be able to get out to the public.”
“I mean, this is a behemoth, this is a Goliath, I am but a David trying to say that the emperor has no clothes. And, um, being a small little ant I can be crushed, and I am aware of that. But, this is something that is bigger than me, this is something that needs to be said to the American public.”

Project Veritas intends to continue investigating abuses in big tech companies and encourages more Silicon Valley insiders to share their stories through their Be Brave campaign.

As of publishing, Google did not respond to Project Veritas’ request for comment. Additional leaked Google documents can be viewed HERE.
 
Last edited:
'How Do We Prevent It from Happening Again

*coughs*
*clears throat*
*coughs again*

VOTE FOR SOMEONE DIFFERENT NEXT TIME, YOU FUCKING IDIOTS. IT'S NOT ROCKET SCIENCE.
 
'How Do We Prevent It from Happening Again

*coughs*
*clears throat*
*coughs again*

VOTE FOR SOMEONE DIFFERENT NEXT TIME, YOU FUCKING IDIOTS. IT'S NOT ROCKET SCIENCE.
Google: Correction! How do we keep people from thinking for themselves and having free will?
 
Last time tech companies went full "direct influence" we ended up with the Arab Spring and the rise of ISIS (and everything that came with that).
Nono, this time will be different because we have trannys and token niggers!
 
literally "WHAT DID THE ROMANS EVER DO FOR US REEEEEEEEE". you don't complain when your tendies get delivered hot-n-fresh from papa bezos' mcdelivery service. next time you use google to look up tranny porn (because you're a repressed homosexual) just remember how pathetic you drumpftards are.

Nigger, they're blacklisting Tim Pool because he tells the truth. The most milquetoast criticism of the left is being censored. They want to steer nations. You're either trolling or a dumb fucktard, because this will affect you. Bezos doesn't give a fuck about steering nations, he's a greedy corporate sociopath who got lucky. Google is actively censoring and trying to make people think the way they want to.

This proves they have no protection under Communications Decency Act 203 and is in fact a direct violation of it, massively so. They are publishing content and pruning it at will, bending it to a certain political view. Its illegal you stupid fuck.

How long till all those affiliated with Project Veritas are not only completely shadow banned/blacklisted but also removed from social media?

Pretty soon, considering they just handed the DoJ some huge ammo.

But lets be real. Democrats will defend this and Trump and the Republicans won't do shit. This will continue to happen. Its already obvious to anyone with half a fucking brain Google, Facebook and Twitter have been constantly violating 203 for ages now.
 
But lets be real. Democrats will defend this and Trump and the Republicans won't do shit. This will continue to happen. Its already obvious to anyone with half a fucking brain Google, Facebook and Twitter have been constantly violating 203 for ages now.

See: Obamacare repeal actually being in sight and Republicans suddenly balking.

Voters do not reward success. They reward eternally crying about wedge issues.
 
This is so deliberate it makes me think that Google wants to be punished.

Just like how Antifa faggots think that running towards a machine gun and getting intentionally hit is a heroic act that will certainly make them a martyr.
 
This is so deliberate it makes me think that Google wants to be punished.

They just think they won't be, and they are honestly probably right.

Any punishment would be decried as politically motivated no matter who does it.
 
Ok, so you could look at these results and come to two conclusions, based on your familiarity with computer programming and conspiratorial tendencies:

1. The autistic trannies at google made a goddamn rule that they had to have X amount of niggers in every search result for woke points, goddamnit!
2. Huh, still a lot of black dudes in my search results for white american inventors. Though, now I think of it, the term "white american" isn't really a thing in biographic web pages (they usually instead mention specific countries of ancestry), and white is used a lot in racially-independent contexts, so "white american" isn't really going to filter as much as I'd like it to. Maybe I should set it to exclude results with African instead. What happens if I do that?

View attachment 813567

It's all references to the meme and screenshots, you tech-illiterate conspiratorial idiot.
Keep beating that strawman you nigger, the accusation was obviously that they fiddled with the algorithm to more prominently display Pieces Of Crap.
And you only showed that when you explicitly make a query to not include images that would apply to "african" keyword, you get crackers. The problem is, your peanut brain forgot to explain how that contradicts the - conspirational, mind you - allegation.
 
I lost the quote, but someone asked if this wasn't technically legal. Yes and no.

Yes because, indeed, people and corporates are and should be allowed to support whoever they want because we have (and should always have) freedom of association. Meaning, if they want to donate to Satan's candidacy, go ahead. Now, I think there is an understanding that, by giving money to a candidate, you're doing it to stop the other one/s from winning. But this would be like saying that if I win a race, I'm stopping my competitors from winning. I'm not actively doing so because they can win if they are faster.

In the case of what google and others are doing, they are not just running faster, they're throwing rocks at the other competitors. I dunno what are the laws for that in USA, but I'm sure there is or should be something about obstruction in the same way there are protections against monopolies.

If you honestly think the strongest search engine on the planet is run by exceptional computers, you're still thinking like 2003.
View attachment 813556
I don't even know what they are trying to accomplish with this. For starters, I think this was caused by people triggerign the algorith bby commenting on certain results (which can happen).

OTOH, they must be very stupid if they believe people won't notice. The only ones who will notice and feel glad are the woke blacks who probably masturbate at the idea tha white people don't exist and believe inventing peanut butter is the epitome of cultural contribution, more than, dunno, penicillin.
 
I know Project Veritas is biased as all fuck, but listening to their expose is making me legit mad on the internet. Especially since its saying stuff everyone here has known for years.
 
Theodore Roosevelt is saying we should break up Standard Oil. And like, I love him but he’s very misguided, like that will not make it better it will make it worse, because all these smaller companies who don’t have the same resources that we do will be charged with preventing the next Taft Situation , it’s like a small company cannot do that.
literally "WHAT DID THE ROMANS EVER DO FOR US REEEEEEEEE". you don't complain when your tendies get delivered hot-n-fresh from papa bezos' mcdelivery service. next time you use google to look up tranny porn (because you're a repressed homosexual) just remember how pathetic you drumpftards are.
Jokes on you I use Duck Duck Go to find my Tranny porn in order to repress my feelings of bisexuality.
 
Back
Top Bottom