Google Exec Decries Trump’s Election: ‘How Do We Prevent It from Happening Again’ - "They can pressure us but we’re not changing," claims Google as they double-down on seditious strategy for election interference.

(backup video)

Project Veritas - Google Exec Decries Trump's Election: 'How Do We Prevent It from Happening Again' | Breitbart

Undercover videos recorded by Project Veritas reveals that Google is determined to prevent the re-election of Donald Trump in 2020, and is altering its products with this aim in mind.

www.breitbart.com

Project Veritas - Google Exec Decries Trump's Election: 'How Do We Prevent It from Happening Again' | Breitbart
Allum Bokhari



Undercover videos recorded by Project Veritas reveals that Google is determined to prevent the re-election of Donald Trump in 2020, and is altering its products with this aim in mind.
The report includes undercover footage featuring a top Google executive, Jen Gennai, discussing how Google might prevent an electoral outcome like 2016 from happening again.



Here’s what Gennai says in the undercover video:

We all got screwed over in 2016, again it wasn’t just us, it was, the people got screwed over, the news media got screwed over, like, everybody got screwed over so we’re rapidly been like, happened there and how do we prevent it from happening again.
We’re also training our algorithms, like, if 2016 happened again, would we have, would the outcome be different?

Gennai also declares her opposition to Democrat presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren’s proposal to break up Google. Why? Because, says Gennai, if Google is broken up it can’t prevent another “Trump situation.”

Elizabeth Warren is saying we should break up Google. And like, I love her but she’s very misguided, like that will not make it better it will make it worse, because all these smaller companies who don’t have the same resources that we do will be charged with preventing the next Trump situation, it’s like a small company cannot do that.

Gennai also declared that no amount of soft pressure from Congress or the White House will make Google change its ways. In other words, talk won’t help — if politicians want to change Google’s behavior, they’ll have to go beyond committee hearings and actually change the law.

We got called in front of Congress multiple times, so we’ve not shown up because we know that they’re just going to attack us. We’re not going to change our, we’re not going to change our mind. There’s no use sitting there being attacked over something we know we’re not going to change. They can pressure us but we’re not changing. But we also have to be aware of what they’re doing and what they’re accusing us of.

According to her professional profile, Gennai works on “responsible innovation” in the Global Affairs division of Google — the same division run by Kent Walker, the Google VP who has declared his intention to make the populist-nationalist movement represented by Donald Trump a “blip” or “hiccup” in history, which he said “bends towards progress.”

Walker made these statements just days after the 2016 election, in a confidential video recording that was leaked to Breitbart News.

Google Insider to Project Veritas: YouTube Deliberately Suppresses PragerU, Dave Rubin, Tim Pool | Breitbart

A Google insider who spoke anonymously to Project Veritas claims that Google-owned video platform YouTube is discriminating against creators who do not meet the tech giant's political criteria.

www.breitbart.com

Google Insider to Project Veritas: YouTube Deliberately Suppresses PragerU, Dave Rubin, Tim Pool | Breitbart
Allum Bokhari


A Google insider who spoke anonymously to Project Veritas claims that Google-owned video platform YouTube is discriminating against creators who do not meet the tech giant’s political criteria.

The insider explained that Google and YouTube use terms like “machine learning fairness” to give a sheen of neutrality to their efforts to suppress content that might contradict progressive narratives.

He also claimed that their efforts now extend beyond conservatives to non-partisan commentators who critique the left as well as the right, like independent journalist Tim Pool.

Via Project Veritas’ interview with the insider:

…They described that they were going to have more content filtering, and right after that happened a lot of the content creators started to get demonetized, and their videos started to get deranked. I’m talking about Dave Rubin, I’m talking about Carpe Diem, I’m talking about Tim Pool, and a lot of the other content creators that are within YouTube ecosystem just saw their, their view counts just go through the floor.
So, Google is targeting what they consider rightwing news commentators so that includes Tim Pool, Dave Rubin, Steven Crowder, and a host of other right wing people that they are coming in and they’re deciding that they don’t want these opinions to have a wide appeal. And so they’re coming in and they’re putting their thumb down, and they’re deciding which content the users are allowed to see.

They’re playing narrative control. And what they’re doing it is they’re applying their human, the human component, which is they’re going through – with an army people – and they are manually intervening, and removing your content from, from their servers, and they are saying that the algorithms did it. And in that case for the high profile people, it’s not just ML Fairness that you guys have to worry about, it’s actual people that have their head filled with this SJW mindset, they’re going through and removing the content because it – because they don’t agree with it.

Watch the full interview below:

Project Veritas also obtained undercover footage revealing yet another Google executive declaring the company’s intention to intervene in its products to stop Trump in 2020. “Responsible innovation” head Jen Gennai was recorded stating that Google shouldn’t be broken up because smaller companies couldn’t prevent “another Trump situation.”

Insider Blows Whistle & Exec Reveals Google Plan to Prevent “Trump situation” in 2020 on Hidden Cam

(New York City) — Project Veritas has released a new report on Google which includes undercover video of a Senior Google Executive, leaked documents, and testimony from a Google insider.

www.projectveritas.com

Insider Blows Whistle & Exec Reveals Google Plan to Prevent “Trump situation” in 2020 on Hidden Cam

Insider: Google “is bent on never letting somebody like Donald Trump come to power again.”
Google Head of Responsible Innovation Says Elizabeth Warren “misguided” on “breaking up Google”
Google Exec Says Don’t Break Us Up: “smaller companies don’t have the resources” to “prevent next Trump situation”
Insider Says PragerU And Dave Rubin Content Suppressed, Targeted As “Right-Wing”
LEAKED Documents Highlight “Machine Learning Fairness” and Google’s Practices to Make Search Results “fair and equitable”
Documents Appear to Show “Editorial” Policies That Determine How Google Publishes News
Insider: Google Violates “letter of the law” and “spirit of the law” on Section 230


(New York City) — Project Veritas has released a new report on Google which includes undercover video of a Senior Google Executive, leaked documents, and testimony from a Google insider. The report appears to show Google’s plans to affect the outcome of the 2020 elections and “prevent” the next “Trump situation.”

The report includes undercover footage of longtime Google employee and Head of Responsible Innovation, Jen Gennai saying:

“Elizabeth Warren is saying we should break up Google. And like, I love her but she’s very misguided, like that will not make it better it will make it worse, because all these smaller companies who don’t have the same resources that we do will be charged with preventing the next Trump situation, it’s like a small company cannot do that.”

Said Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe:

“This is the third tech insider who has bravely stepped forward to expose the secrets of Silicon Valley. These new documents, supported by undercover video, raise questions of Google’s neutrality and the role they see themselves fulfilling in the 2020 elections.”

Jen Gennai is the head of “Responsible Innovation” for Google, a sector that monitors and evaluates the responsible implementation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies. In the video, Gennai says Google has been working diligently to “prevent” the results of the 2016 election from repeating in 2020:

“We all got screwed over in 2016, again it wasn’t just us, it was, the people got screwed over, the news media got screwed over, like, everybody got screwed over so we’re rapidly been like, what happened there and how do we prevent it from happening again.”
“We’re also training our algorithms, like, if 2016 happened again, would we have, would the outcome be different?”

Google: Artificial Intelligence Is For A “fair and equitable” State

According to the insider, Machine Learning Fairness is one of the many tools Google uses to promote a political agenda. Documents leaked by a Google informant elaborate on Machine Learning Fairness and the “algorithmic unfairness” that AI product intervention aims to solve:



The insider showed Google search examples that show Machine Learning Fairness in action.



“The reason we launched our A.I. principles is because people were not putting that line in the sand, that they were not saying what’s fair and what’s equitable so we’re like, well we are a big company, we’re going to say it.” – Jen Gennai, Head Of Responsible Innovation, Google

The Google insider explained the impact of artificial intelligence and Machine Learning Fairness:

“They’re going to redefine a reality based on what they think is fair and based upon what they want, and what and is part of their agenda.”

Determining credible news and an editorial agenda. . .

Additional leaked documents detail how Google defines and prioritizes content from different news publishers and how its products feature that content. One document, called the “Fake News-letter” explains Google’s goal to have a “single point of truth” across their products.



Another document received by Project Veritas explains the “News Ecosystem” which mentions “editorial guidelines” that appear to be determined and administered internally by Google. These guidelines control how content is distributed and displayed on their site.



The leaked documents appear to show that Google makes news decisions about what news they promote and distribute on their site.

Comments made by Gennai raise similar questions. In a conversation with Veritas journalists, Gennai explains that “conservative sources” and “credible sources” don’t always coincide according to Google’s editorial practices.

“We have gotten accusations of around fairness is that we’re unfair to conservatives because we’re choosing what we find as credible news sources and those sources don’t necessarily overlap with conservative sources …”

The insider shed additional light on how YouTube demotes content from influencers like Dave Rubin and Tim Pool:

“What YouTube did is they changed the results of the recommendation engine. And so what the recommendation engine is it tries to do, is it tries to say, well, if you like A, then you’re probably going to like B. So content that is similar to Dave Rubin or Tim Pool, instead of listing Dave Rubin or Tim Pool as people that you might like, what they’re doing is that they’re trying to suggest different, different news outlets, for example, like CNN, or MSNBC, or these left leaning political outlets.”

Internal Google Document: “People Like Us Are Programmed”

An additional document Project Veritas obtained, titled “Fair is Not the Default” says “People (like us) are programmed” after the results of machine learning fairness. The document describes how “unconscious bias” and algorithms interact.



Veritas is the “Only Way”

Said the insider:

“The reason why I came to Project Veritas is that you’re the only one I trust to be able to be a real investigative journalist. Investigative journalist is a dead career option, but somehow, you’ve been able to make it work. And because of that I came to Project Veritas because I knew that this was the only way that this story would be able to get out to the public.”
“I mean, this is a behemoth, this is a Goliath, I am but a David trying to say that the emperor has no clothes. And, um, being a small little ant I can be crushed, and I am aware of that. But, this is something that is bigger than me, this is something that needs to be said to the American public.”

Project Veritas intends to continue investigating abuses in big tech companies and encourages more Silicon Valley insiders to share their stories through their Be Brave campaign.

As of publishing, Google did not respond to Project Veritas’ request for comment. Additional leaked Google documents can be viewed HERE.

 

[REGENDarySumanai]

Google must be destroyed for the benefit of all of humanity. They have dug too deep and have become a monster.

 

[GrungyLawnChlorinate]

Google must be destroyed for the benefit of all of humanity. They have dug too deep and have become a monster.

It's crazy how in the video she states that they don't want Google to be broken up because then they won't have the power to steer nations. Everyone has long assumed that was one of their goals, but to just come out and say it. What the absolute fuck.

 

[Gypsymagic]

Tested the google search thing they tried in the video myself and they're not wrong, Hillary Clinton email brings up only 1 result while Trump brings up a whole list. Even though Hillary had a whole scandal revolving around her Emails. According to google that never happened and no one ever searches for it.



Google doesn't care about the truth, they want to manipulate society for their definition of "fairness".

 

[Guts]

"was"

 

[TowinKarz]

And by "Evil" we, naturally, meant "Elect Republican Populists"

 

[not william stenchever]

Google delenda est

 

[REGENDarySumanai]

This is just giving more ammo to the DOJ and others investigating Google. This is a ticking time bomb and neutralizing it is the only way forward.

 

[GrungyLawnChlorinate]

View attachment 813426
"was"

Imagine going on a date with a guy. At your first meeting the first thing he says is "I'm not a rapist." Maybe best to look back at Google's 'do no evil' crap in that light, as the creepy virtue signaling it was. They were playing to the '80s and '90s internet idealists who thought we were going to usher in some great information superhighway cyber utopia. Little did people know that Eric Schmidt was a spook and their goal was always total information awareness and the power that comes with.

 

[A shitty ass clover]

This is some Bob Page tier shit. Google went the way of Skynet so easy it's fucking frightening

 

[RetardedCat]

I hope the investigation uses that to destroy them completely before 2020. But knowing the judicial system it's gonna take so long that Google will replace the judicial system before they get investigated.

 

[Arminius]

I'm sure they'll just use the same excuses as the last few times they've been in front of congress. "It's AI, it's unbiased, searches still come back just not on the home page" then add some jargon that boomers can't comprehend about the tech process. I think I saw a study about how 90% of people don't search past the first page of results, So they can easily push all the "wrong think" results to that area, and claim they're still being fair. But in all seriousness I doubt anything will come of this, those that care about these things haven't been using google for awhile, and for those that don't, it'll be quickly memory holed.
Edit- "MUH PRIVATE PLATFORM"

 

[Libtard-Wrecking Krogoth]

Google must be destroyed for the benefit of all of humanity. They have dug too deep and have become a monster.

literally "WHAT DID THE ROMANS EVER DO FOR US REEEEEEEEE". you don't complain when your tendies get delivered hot-n-fresh from papa bezos' mcdelivery service. next time you use google to look up tranny porn (because you're a repressed homosexual) just remember how pathetic you drumpftards are.

 

[shartshooter]

literally "WHAT DID THE ROMANS EVER DO FOR US REEEEEEEEE". you don't complain when your tendies get delivered hot-n-fresh from papa bezos' mcdelivery service. next time you use google to look up tranny porn (because you're a repressed homosexual) just remember how pathetic you drumpftards are.

All it took to make the left a bunch of corporate bootlickers was some lip service to pride month.

 

[OB 946]

I'm shocked. Really.

 

[UQ 770]

You know, as fucked as this is, I have to ask...

Isn't this completely legal? Corporate entities influence elections constantly. Google is just trying to do it in a more direct fashion.

I fucking hate them too, but unlike that shit where they tried to stick their dick in China, I have a hard time believeing the government can do anything about this one. This is the stuff you risk in a democracy.

Though, fear not conservatives, I think an important factor in Trump getting elected was that flood of videos and spam ads encouraging people to get out and vote and also linking them with precise instructions for how to vote. Those videos tried as hard as possible to be unbiased, and it appears it kind of worked in exactly the opposite way Google intended. If Google tries to meddle in the election again and is inept as last time, Trump is going to win a third term.

 

[Bonedome]

I didn't vote for Trump the first time but these years have been such a ride I had a dream the other day about voting for him. For some reason the ballets were notebook paper and I had to write his name out, but I did it.

To me the best way to "prevent it from happening again" is to stop being so exceptional, but they just keep getting worse.

 

[GrungyLawnChlorinate]

Agenda | Berkeley Law

23rd Annual BCLT/BTLJ Symposium Governing Machines: Defining and Enforcing Public Policy Values in AI Systems Register here Thursday, April 4, 2019 2:00 p.m. Welcoming and Framing Remarks Jennifer Urban and Ken Bamberger 2:15 p.m. – 3:15 p.m. Fairness and/or/vs. Privacy and Dignity Humans may...

www.law.berkeley.edu

https://www.law.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Jen-Gennai.pptx

Trust but Verify – Validating and Defending Against Machine Decisions

Algorithms are used to “prosecute” a variety of goals: to track crime and allocate police resources, to remove offensive or infringing content, to create evidence in court proceedings, to predict creditworthiness or future criminality, to diagnose disease. What adversarial processes (legal or algorithmic) can vet or challenge these predictions and decisions? How do we know if AI/ML systems measure up to the legal standard of care (whatever that is)? Transparency and explainability are the tools currently on the table in the regulatory context. Are these sufficient (or even practical)? What alternatives could there be for testing and validating AI/ML systems?

Well said, Jen Gennai!

Aaaannd she's already deleted her Twitter account, @JenRobinSparx. Edit: never mind, she has changed her Twitter username.

Her LinkedIn doesn't show any education credentials or work experience, just a bunch of Coursera courses. Is she a skill-less diversity hire?

 

[verissimus]

How long till all those affiliated with Project Veritas are not only completely shadow banned/blacklisted but also removed from social media?

 

[REGENDarySumanai]

How long till all those affiliated with Project Veritas are not only completely shadow banned/blacklisted but also removed from social media?

They'd file a big lawsuit against that and that would only encourage more tech whistleblowers.