Google Exec Decries Trump’s Election: ‘How Do We Prevent It from Happening Again’ - "They can pressure us but we’re not changing," claims Google as they double-down on seditious strategy for election interference.

(backup video)

Project Veritas - Google Exec Decries Trump's Election: 'How Do We Prevent It from Happening Again' | Breitbart

Undercover videos recorded by Project Veritas reveals that Google is determined to prevent the re-election of Donald Trump in 2020, and is altering its products with this aim in mind.

www.breitbart.com

Project Veritas - Google Exec Decries Trump's Election: 'How Do We Prevent It from Happening Again' | Breitbart
Allum Bokhari



Undercover videos recorded by Project Veritas reveals that Google is determined to prevent the re-election of Donald Trump in 2020, and is altering its products with this aim in mind.
The report includes undercover footage featuring a top Google executive, Jen Gennai, discussing how Google might prevent an electoral outcome like 2016 from happening again.



Here’s what Gennai says in the undercover video:

We all got screwed over in 2016, again it wasn’t just us, it was, the people got screwed over, the news media got screwed over, like, everybody got screwed over so we’re rapidly been like, happened there and how do we prevent it from happening again.
We’re also training our algorithms, like, if 2016 happened again, would we have, would the outcome be different?

Gennai also declares her opposition to Democrat presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren’s proposal to break up Google. Why? Because, says Gennai, if Google is broken up it can’t prevent another “Trump situation.”

Elizabeth Warren is saying we should break up Google. And like, I love her but she’s very misguided, like that will not make it better it will make it worse, because all these smaller companies who don’t have the same resources that we do will be charged with preventing the next Trump situation, it’s like a small company cannot do that.

Gennai also declared that no amount of soft pressure from Congress or the White House will make Google change its ways. In other words, talk won’t help — if politicians want to change Google’s behavior, they’ll have to go beyond committee hearings and actually change the law.

We got called in front of Congress multiple times, so we’ve not shown up because we know that they’re just going to attack us. We’re not going to change our, we’re not going to change our mind. There’s no use sitting there being attacked over something we know we’re not going to change. They can pressure us but we’re not changing. But we also have to be aware of what they’re doing and what they’re accusing us of.

According to her professional profile, Gennai works on “responsible innovation” in the Global Affairs division of Google — the same division run by Kent Walker, the Google VP who has declared his intention to make the populist-nationalist movement represented by Donald Trump a “blip” or “hiccup” in history, which he said “bends towards progress.”

Walker made these statements just days after the 2016 election, in a confidential video recording that was leaked to Breitbart News.

Google Insider to Project Veritas: YouTube Deliberately Suppresses PragerU, Dave Rubin, Tim Pool | Breitbart

A Google insider who spoke anonymously to Project Veritas claims that Google-owned video platform YouTube is discriminating against creators who do not meet the tech giant's political criteria.

www.breitbart.com

Google Insider to Project Veritas: YouTube Deliberately Suppresses PragerU, Dave Rubin, Tim Pool | Breitbart
Allum Bokhari


A Google insider who spoke anonymously to Project Veritas claims that Google-owned video platform YouTube is discriminating against creators who do not meet the tech giant’s political criteria.

The insider explained that Google and YouTube use terms like “machine learning fairness” to give a sheen of neutrality to their efforts to suppress content that might contradict progressive narratives.

He also claimed that their efforts now extend beyond conservatives to non-partisan commentators who critique the left as well as the right, like independent journalist Tim Pool.

Via Project Veritas’ interview with the insider:

…They described that they were going to have more content filtering, and right after that happened a lot of the content creators started to get demonetized, and their videos started to get deranked. I’m talking about Dave Rubin, I’m talking about Carpe Diem, I’m talking about Tim Pool, and a lot of the other content creators that are within YouTube ecosystem just saw their, their view counts just go through the floor.
So, Google is targeting what they consider rightwing news commentators so that includes Tim Pool, Dave Rubin, Steven Crowder, and a host of other right wing people that they are coming in and they’re deciding that they don’t want these opinions to have a wide appeal. And so they’re coming in and they’re putting their thumb down, and they’re deciding which content the users are allowed to see.

They’re playing narrative control. And what they’re doing it is they’re applying their human, the human component, which is they’re going through – with an army people – and they are manually intervening, and removing your content from, from their servers, and they are saying that the algorithms did it. And in that case for the high profile people, it’s not just ML Fairness that you guys have to worry about, it’s actual people that have their head filled with this SJW mindset, they’re going through and removing the content because it – because they don’t agree with it.

Watch the full interview below:

Project Veritas also obtained undercover footage revealing yet another Google executive declaring the company’s intention to intervene in its products to stop Trump in 2020. “Responsible innovation” head Jen Gennai was recorded stating that Google shouldn’t be broken up because smaller companies couldn’t prevent “another Trump situation.”

Insider Blows Whistle & Exec Reveals Google Plan to Prevent “Trump situation” in 2020 on Hidden Cam

(New York City) — Project Veritas has released a new report on Google which includes undercover video of a Senior Google Executive, leaked documents, and testimony from a Google insider.

www.projectveritas.com

Insider Blows Whistle & Exec Reveals Google Plan to Prevent “Trump situation” in 2020 on Hidden Cam

Insider: Google “is bent on never letting somebody like Donald Trump come to power again.”
Google Head of Responsible Innovation Says Elizabeth Warren “misguided” on “breaking up Google”
Google Exec Says Don’t Break Us Up: “smaller companies don’t have the resources” to “prevent next Trump situation”
Insider Says PragerU And Dave Rubin Content Suppressed, Targeted As “Right-Wing”
LEAKED Documents Highlight “Machine Learning Fairness” and Google’s Practices to Make Search Results “fair and equitable”
Documents Appear to Show “Editorial” Policies That Determine How Google Publishes News
Insider: Google Violates “letter of the law” and “spirit of the law” on Section 230


(New York City) — Project Veritas has released a new report on Google which includes undercover video of a Senior Google Executive, leaked documents, and testimony from a Google insider. The report appears to show Google’s plans to affect the outcome of the 2020 elections and “prevent” the next “Trump situation.”

The report includes undercover footage of longtime Google employee and Head of Responsible Innovation, Jen Gennai saying:

“Elizabeth Warren is saying we should break up Google. And like, I love her but she’s very misguided, like that will not make it better it will make it worse, because all these smaller companies who don’t have the same resources that we do will be charged with preventing the next Trump situation, it’s like a small company cannot do that.”

Said Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe:

“This is the third tech insider who has bravely stepped forward to expose the secrets of Silicon Valley. These new documents, supported by undercover video, raise questions of Google’s neutrality and the role they see themselves fulfilling in the 2020 elections.”

Jen Gennai is the head of “Responsible Innovation” for Google, a sector that monitors and evaluates the responsible implementation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies. In the video, Gennai says Google has been working diligently to “prevent” the results of the 2016 election from repeating in 2020:

“We all got screwed over in 2016, again it wasn’t just us, it was, the people got screwed over, the news media got screwed over, like, everybody got screwed over so we’re rapidly been like, what happened there and how do we prevent it from happening again.”
“We’re also training our algorithms, like, if 2016 happened again, would we have, would the outcome be different?”

Google: Artificial Intelligence Is For A “fair and equitable” State

According to the insider, Machine Learning Fairness is one of the many tools Google uses to promote a political agenda. Documents leaked by a Google informant elaborate on Machine Learning Fairness and the “algorithmic unfairness” that AI product intervention aims to solve:



The insider showed Google search examples that show Machine Learning Fairness in action.



“The reason we launched our A.I. principles is because people were not putting that line in the sand, that they were not saying what’s fair and what’s equitable so we’re like, well we are a big company, we’re going to say it.” – Jen Gennai, Head Of Responsible Innovation, Google

The Google insider explained the impact of artificial intelligence and Machine Learning Fairness:

“They’re going to redefine a reality based on what they think is fair and based upon what they want, and what and is part of their agenda.”

Determining credible news and an editorial agenda. . .

Additional leaked documents detail how Google defines and prioritizes content from different news publishers and how its products feature that content. One document, called the “Fake News-letter” explains Google’s goal to have a “single point of truth” across their products.



Another document received by Project Veritas explains the “News Ecosystem” which mentions “editorial guidelines” that appear to be determined and administered internally by Google. These guidelines control how content is distributed and displayed on their site.



The leaked documents appear to show that Google makes news decisions about what news they promote and distribute on their site.

Comments made by Gennai raise similar questions. In a conversation with Veritas journalists, Gennai explains that “conservative sources” and “credible sources” don’t always coincide according to Google’s editorial practices.

“We have gotten accusations of around fairness is that we’re unfair to conservatives because we’re choosing what we find as credible news sources and those sources don’t necessarily overlap with conservative sources …”

The insider shed additional light on how YouTube demotes content from influencers like Dave Rubin and Tim Pool:

“What YouTube did is they changed the results of the recommendation engine. And so what the recommendation engine is it tries to do, is it tries to say, well, if you like A, then you’re probably going to like B. So content that is similar to Dave Rubin or Tim Pool, instead of listing Dave Rubin or Tim Pool as people that you might like, what they’re doing is that they’re trying to suggest different, different news outlets, for example, like CNN, or MSNBC, or these left leaning political outlets.”

Internal Google Document: “People Like Us Are Programmed”

An additional document Project Veritas obtained, titled “Fair is Not the Default” says “People (like us) are programmed” after the results of machine learning fairness. The document describes how “unconscious bias” and algorithms interact.



Veritas is the “Only Way”

Said the insider:

“The reason why I came to Project Veritas is that you’re the only one I trust to be able to be a real investigative journalist. Investigative journalist is a dead career option, but somehow, you’ve been able to make it work. And because of that I came to Project Veritas because I knew that this was the only way that this story would be able to get out to the public.”
“I mean, this is a behemoth, this is a Goliath, I am but a David trying to say that the emperor has no clothes. And, um, being a small little ant I can be crushed, and I am aware of that. But, this is something that is bigger than me, this is something that needs to be said to the American public.”

Project Veritas intends to continue investigating abuses in big tech companies and encourages more Silicon Valley insiders to share their stories through their Be Brave campaign.

As of publishing, Google did not respond to Project Veritas’ request for comment. Additional leaked Google documents can be viewed HERE.

 

[GrungyLawnChlorinate]

How long till all those affiliated with Project Veritas are not only completely shadow banned/blacklisted but also removed from social media?

Reddit Suspends Users Who Post Project Veritas Videos

Tech platforms are wiping any evidence of the Project Veritas video exposing Pinterest censorship. Twitter and YouTube have both taken down mentions of the Project Veritas Pinterest exposé in the past week since its release.

www.newsbusters.org

Another account posted: “It looks like it is impossible to post a link to projectveritas on reddit. Even after adding an automod auto approval rule or manually trying to approve a link to that domain it is set right back to be removed.”

 

[Haramburger]

View attachment 813437

the meme is trying to be sarcastic, but IT is still a wild west where the guy on the left can unironically stand shoulder-to-shoulder as a threat to the corporations on the right. He just needs to be motivated enough to put on the mask and become HACKERMAN™

 

[Nobunaga]

I hope the investigation uses that to destroy them completely before 2020. But knowing the judicial system it's gonna take so long that Google will replace the judicial system before they get investigated.

>inb4 they pull a disney

 

[Console]

Tested the google search thing they tried in the video myself and they're not wrong, Hillary Clinton email brings up only 1 result while Trump brings up a whole list. Even though Hillary had a whole scandal revolving around her Emails. According to google that never happened and no one ever searches for it.

View attachment 813425

Google doesn't care about the truth, they want to manipulate society for their definition of "fairness".

They may have removed the search predictions on the home page, but they haven't removed them from Google Trends. The Explore page reveals even more data, however Google blocks Archive Today and the WayBackMachine, so here's a couple of screenshots instead. (Would it be better to get PDF or raw HTML archives?)

 

[Sexy Senior Citizen]

Who knew Dale Gribble was a prophet instead of a whackjob?

 

[GrungyLawnChlorinate]

They may have removed the search predictions on the home page, but they haven't removed them from Google Trends. The Explore page reveals even more data, however Google blocks Archive Today and the WayBackMachine, so here's a couple of screenshots instead. (Would it be better to get PDF or raw HTML archives?)

View attachment 813463

View attachment 813465

The SingleFile browser plugin takes a single web archive that is at least equal to Archive.today's archiving. I think it's likely that archive would contain some personal information though, so maybe screenshot would be better.

 

[MarineTrainedTard]

I mean the real answer is "Maybe don't put up a candidate despised by the right AND a good chunk of the left as his opponent in 2016" but it's a bit too late for that

 

[break these cuffs]

I mean the real answer is "Maybe don't put up a candidate despised by the right AND a good chunk of the left as his opponent in 2016" but it's a bit too late for that

I think your forget that it was Her Turn, mate.

 

[Ruin]

Who knew Dale Gribble was a prophet instead of a whackjob?
https://youtube.com/watch?v=enBllfqkMEw:5

You take that back, Gribble has always been a prophet.

 

[CheezzyMach]

I mean hasn't it been obvious for the past 3 years that they'd repeat the same mistakes as 2016?

 

[Hux]

View attachment 813426
"was"

This is why I applaud Google for dropping that motto because at that point, even they know it's a complete and utter farce. There is no possible way any person or group could've gotten the money and power they have now and NOT have been at least a tiny little bit evil

 

[SmileyTimeDayCare]

How long till all those affiliated with Project Veritas are not only completely shadow banned/blacklisted but also removed from social media?

How long till all those affiliated with Project Veritas are not only completely shadow banned/blacklisted but also removed from social media?

Some city came after them and lost. Twitter attempts to suppress them there's no question but they get carried by too many large Twitter users.

The best part of any PV story are the cardboard accounts that come out to claim they are frauds and the video is fake/edited/whatever. Nigga you just watched a video of someone in a position of power saying they have changed things to avoid another Trump situation that's not ambiguous.

Twitter is definitely keeping it off the trending page.

 

[CWCissey]

Anti-trust needs to get cracking now.

BULLY!

 

[Unog]

"But they're just in it for the money guys!"

 

[Thomas Paine]

So I found a comment on the Veritas video and I did as it instructed and holy shit.
Google janitors are quickly deleting comments and have frozen the like/dislike ratio as well as view count.

 

[SmileyTimeDayCare]

So I found a comment on the Veritas video and I did as it instructed and holy shit.
Google janitors are quickly deleting comments and have frozen the like/dislike ratio as well as view count.
View attachment 813520

Pretty sure that's been the state of that search for years.

George Washington Carver always cracks me the fuck up. All the shit they claim were Carver Inventions were already known things. Peanut Butter? Peanut based Chili sauce? Peanut glue? Nigga didn't bring that to humanity.

Okay you can claim he helped agriculture in the south but the idea that he fixed it single-handed is absurd and the idea that introduced the concept of crop rotation is ludicrous. He may have convinced people that continually planting cotton wasn't a great idea but I'm pretty sure crop rotation was already being used in a lot of places.

He's the original Kang. He took a bunch of shit that was already known, used it to convince people to grow a certain product, and historians decided to canonize him.

Not saying he wasn't an important figure but damn is he overrated. Him and fucking Edison.

Carver hits that bong in his lab.

 

[Absolutego]

So I found a comment on the Veritas video and I did as it instructed and holy shit.
Google janitors are quickly deleting comments and have frozen the like/dislike ratio as well as view count.
View attachment 813520

The "family" image being an African family and the "white family" search redirecting to a rock band I get, but are you absolutely certain the "American inventors" results aren't disproportionately filled with black people because the politically acceptable way to refer to them is "African-American"?

People should remember how retardedly literal computers are and that the all-encompassing "algorithm" is likely just ranking things by keyword frequency.

 

[Thomas Paine]

The "family" image being an African family and the "white family" search redirecting to a rock band I get, but are you absolutely certain the "American inventors" results aren't disproportionately filled with black people because the politically acceptable way to refer to them is "African-American"?

People should remember how retardedly literal computers are and that the all-encompassing "algorithm" is likely just ranking things by keyword frequency.

If you honestly think the strongest search engine on the planet is run by retarded computers, you're still thinking like 2003.

 

[Absolutego]

If you honestly think the strongest search engine on the planet is run by exceptional computers, you're still thinking like 2003.
View attachment 813556

Ok, so you could look at these results and come to two conclusions, based on your familiarity with computer programming and conspiratorial tendencies:

1. The autistic trannies at google made a goddamn rule that they had to have X amount of niggers in every search result for woke points, goddamnit!
2. Huh, still a lot of black dudes in my search results for white american inventors. Though, now I think of it, the term "white american" isn't really a thing in biographic web pages (they usually instead mention specific countries of ancestry), and white is used a lot in racially-independent contexts, so "white american" isn't really going to filter as much as I'd like it to. Maybe I should set it to exclude results with African instead. What happens if I do that?

Spoiler: Hey, look at that!

It's all references to the meme and screenshots, you tech-illiterate conspiratorial idiot.

 

[Gustav Schuchardt]

How long till all those affiliated with Project Veritas are not only completely shadow banned/blacklisted but also removed from social media?

It'll happen.

When Rebecca Lewis wrote a report with a diagram of people who'd talked to people who'd talked to Nazis, Twitter banned those people but didn't ban the Nazis.

When Eoin Lenihan pointed out that a lot of journos have links to AntiFa Twitter banned him. And never gave a reason as far as I can tell.

It's getting to the point that the only people allowed on the Internet are AntiFa aligned journalists and a few nutjob far right types like Matthew Heimbach and Richard Spencer who never seem to get deplatformed. In fact the media keep running articles on them as representative of Republicans, despite/because most people on the right see them as loonies. Or Feds.