I'm gonna have to respectfully disagree with you here. Doug doesn't necessarily say anything of value in his December videos, and a lot of them seem disingenuous and rushed. Doug also does videos where he tells you facts about movie that "you probably didn't know". He legit just reads off the imdb trivia page for each movie he covers.
Basically Doug's business is making as many low effort videos as possible for the money. I've stated this before, but if you look at his Adventure Time recaps, it's crystal clear he doesn't give a shit about what he's watching, he's just pandering to his fans. And the sad thing is, they keep eating it up.
I don't know. Most critics produce very high output. I don't think that is any indication of a lack of respect for the medium. Although, I get it if you don't like Doug Walker's content.
I've never heard of those movie trivia videos, but Doug has said repeatedly in the past that he doesn't do videos unless he feels he has something original to add. (For example, he never did the Star Wars Prequels for that reason. Actually, he made a top ten list of often requested reviews which he plans never to make.) //I'll have to check the movie trivia videos out. Maybe it was an idea which failed, or maybe Doug actually is different now.
I like Doug Walker for his opinion pieces. I think he is expressive, well spoken, and can offer thoughtful insight. I think his best episodes emphasize his natural expressiveness in a genuine way, only using the critic character as a prop. Also, the scripts need to use his insight to build a strong arc, or the audience isn't invested. If audience members are focusing entirely on individual jokes, one bomb turns them against you. (The arc doesn't need complexity or a real story; it only needs to offer some significance.)
Great standup comics know this. They build a narrative strong enough that even a joke that goes over terribly doesn't negatively impact the overall performance. Audience members are invested in the whole, so it's hard not to overlook little things. // I think this concept is what made AVGN so much better than Nostalgia Critic in the olden days. I mean, remember Shit Pickle? People overlooked that. But very recently, I think Nostalgia Critic has gotten a lot better at this, and AVGN has gotten a lot worse. (Maybe it's because James Rolfe lost his passion, I don't know.)
Overall, I think contemporary Doug Walker knows much better how to play to his strengths (which he was godawful at originally.)