- Joined
- Aug 25, 2017
Nick didn't clean it up. His parents did. There is no fucky wucky too big or small for them to sweep up when it comes to their little retard.
💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.
- Thread starter Himedall All-seeing Waifu
- Start date
-
🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
SpergioLeonne
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2022
In the below spoiler, I have put AI to an actual good use and asked grok to explain the probable scenarios for Nick’s daughter to have the amount of cocaine metabolites in her hair that she did
The first sentence:
The first sentence:
A hair follicle test result of over 5,000 ng/mg for cocaine in a 9-year-old girl, as reported in the case of Nick Rekieta's daughter, is exceptionally high and suggests significant, likely chronic exposure, most plausibly through ingestion rather than environmental contact. Below, I outline potential ingestion scenarios that could lead to such a high concentration, based on the pharmacokinetics of cocaine, hair incorporation mechanisms, and the extreme nature of the test result. The scenarios are speculative but grounded in scientific understanding of cocaine metabolism and hair testing, as detailed in my prior responses. Note that such a case involving a minor raises serious ethical and legal concerns, likely warranting investigation by child protective services.
### Key Context
- **Test Result**: Over 5,000 ng/mg is far above the Society of Hair Testing (SoHT) cutoff for cocaine (0.5 ng/mg) and its metabolite benzoylecgonine (BZE, 0.05 ng/mg). Typical concentrations from active use range from 0.1–131 ng/mg, with 5,000 ng/mg indicating extreme exposure, likely repeated and high-dose ingestion.
- **Hair Testing Window**: A 1.5-inch hair sample reflects approximately 90 days of exposure (hair grows ~1 cm/month). Drugs take 4–7 days to appear in hair above the scalp, so the result reflects repeated exposure over weeks to months.
- **Child Factors**: A 9-year-old (~28–30 kg) has a smaller body mass and potentially faster metabolism than adults, affecting cocaine pharmacokinetics. Lethal doses for children are lower (0.2–1.2 g), making chronic ingestion scenarios particularly dangerous.
### Potential Ingestion Scenarios
The following scenarios could theoretically lead to a hair cocaine concentration exceeding 5,000 ng/mg, assuming repeated exposure over the 90-day detection window. Each scenario considers the amount, frequency, and context of ingestion, with the caveat that exact doses are difficult to quantify due to variability in metabolism, hair incorporation, and limited pediatric data.
1. **Accidental Ingestion via Contaminated Substances**:
- **Scenario**: The child unknowingly consumes food, drinks, or medications contaminated with cocaine. For example, cocaine residue on surfaces (e.g., kitchen counters, utensils) in a household with heavy drug use could contaminate food or beverages, leading to small but repeated ingestions.
- **Amount and Frequency**: Small doses (e.g., 1–10 mg per incident, equivalent to 1,000–10,000 ng) consumed daily or several times weekly over 90 days could accumulate in hair. For instance, ingesting 5 mg/day (5,000 ng/day) for 60 days totals 300 mg, potentially sufficient to reach 5,000 ng/mg in hair, depending on incorporation efficiency.
- **Mechanism**: Cocaine enters the bloodstream, is metabolized into BZE, and is incorporated into hair follicles. Repeated low-dose exposure could build high concentrations over time, especially in darker hair with higher melanin content.
- **Likelihood**: Possible in a household with poor hygiene and rampant cocaine use, but achieving 5,000 ng/mg would require consistent, significant contamination. Environmental exposure alone (e.g., touching residue) is unlikely to produce such high levels, as washing protocols should remove external cocaine.
- **Indicators**: High BZE levels in the hair test would confirm ingestion, as BZE is a metabolite produced only in the body.
2. **Deliberate Administration by a Caregiver or Third Party**:
- **Scenario**: A caregiver, family member, or other individual intentionally administers cocaine to the child, possibly mixed into food, drinks, or disguised as medication. This could occur in cases of abuse, neglect, or misguided attempts to sedate or control the child.
- **Amount and Frequency**: Doses of 10–50 mg per incident (10,000–50,000 ng), administered multiple times weekly (e.g., 3–5 times/week) over 90 days, could lead to 5,000 ng/mg. For example, 20 mg ingested 4 times weekly for 12 weeks totals ~960 mg, a cumulative dose that could produce extreme hair concentrations.
- **Mechanism**: Chronic ingestion ensures steady incorporation of cocaine and BZE into hair via the bloodstream. The high result suggests frequent dosing, as single or sporadic doses (even large ones) are less likely to produce such elevated levels.
- **Likelihood**: Disturbingly plausible in cases of abuse or neglect, especially in environments with known drug use. The high concentration suggests intentional or reckless administration rather than incidental exposure.
- **Indicators**: Consistent high doses would produce significant BZE and norcocaine in hair, strongly indicating ingestion. This scenario would likely trigger immediate safeguarding concerns.
3. **Self-Ingestion Due to Access in a Drug-Using Environment**:
- **Scenario**: The child finds and ingests cocaine accessible in the home (e.g., powder, pills, or residue mistaken for candy or another substance). This could occur in a household with unsecured drugs and inadequate supervision.
- **Amount and Frequency**: Variable doses (e.g., 5–20 mg per incident) consumed sporadically but repeatedly (e.g., 1–3 times weekly) over 90 days could accumulate. For example, 10 mg ingested twice weekly for 90 days totals ~360 mg, potentially sufficient for high hair concentrations.
- **Mechanism**: Similar to other ingestion scenarios, cocaine is metabolized and incorporated into hair. Sporadic but frequent ingestion could still produce a high cumulative concentration, especially if the child has high melanin content in hair.
- **Likelihood**: Less likely than accidental or deliberate administration, as a 9-year-old is unlikely to seek out cocaine intentionally. However, curiosity or mistaking the substance for something else (e.g., sugar) could lead to ingestion in a chaotic environment.
- **Indicators**: High BZE levels and a pattern of exposure (segmental hair analysis showing consistent drug presence) would support ingestion over environmental contact.
4. **Chronic Exposure Through Breast Milk or Shared Substances (Unlikely)**:
- **Scenario**: If the child were exposed to cocaine via breast milk from a using caregiver or through shared substances (e.g., contaminated pacifiers, bottles), small amounts could be ingested over time. This is less relevant for a 9-year-old, who is unlikely to be breastfed, but could apply to shared items in rare cases.
- **Amount and Frequency**: Very small doses (e.g., 0.1–1 mg per incident) via milk or shared items, consumed daily over 90 days, could accumulate. However, the total dose would likely be too low to reach 5,000 ng/mg.
- **Mechanism**: Low-level ingestion would incorporate trace amounts of cocaine and metabolites into hair, but concentrations would typically be far below 5,000 ng/mg (e.g., 0.1–10 ng/mg).
- **Likelihood**: Highly unlikely for a 9-year-old, as breast milk exposure is age-inappropriate, and shared items would contribute minimal amounts compared to direct ingestion.
### Supporting Factors and Considerations
- **Hair Characteristics**: Darker hair binds cocaine more readily due to higher melanin content, potentially amplifying concentrations. If the child has dark hair, lower doses could still produce high test results.
- **Metabolite Analysis**: The presence of BZE or norcocaine in the hair (especially at high ratios) confirms ingestion, as these are not present in environmental cocaine. A 5,000 ng/mg result with significant BZE strongly points to ingestion rather than skin contact.
- **Testing Protocols**: Inadequate washing or contamination during testing could inflate results, but reputable labs follow SoHT guidelines to minimize false positives. The reported level (over 5,000 ng/mg) is so high that it likely reflects true incorporation via ingestion.
- **Pharmacokinetics in Children**: A 9-year-old’s smaller body mass and faster metabolism could lead to higher relative concentrations in hair for a given dose compared to adults, but data is limited due to ethical constraints on pediatric studies.
- **Toxicity Risks**: Even small doses (e.g., 10 mg) can cause symptoms in a child (e.g., agitation, increased heart rate), and chronic ingestion at levels needed for 5,000 ng/mg would pose severe health risks, including seizures or cardiac issues.
### Challenges in Quantification
- **Dose Variability**: Hair concentrations don’t directly correlate with ingested dose due to differences in metabolism, hair growth, and incorporation rates. Studies on adults show wide ranges (e.g., 0.5–50 ng/mg for moderate use), and 5,000 ng/mg is rare even in heavy users.
- **Lack of Pediatric Data**: No studies quantify cocaine doses in children leading to specific hair concentrations, making estimates speculative. The scenarios above extrapolate from adult data and general principles.
- **Environmental Contamination**: While unlikely to produce 5,000 ng/mg, heavy environmental exposure (e.g., living in a home with frequent cocaine use) could contribute to lower-level positives, complicating interpretation without metabolite analysis.
### Conclusion
The most plausible ingestion scenarios leading to a hair cocaine concentration exceeding 5,000 ng/mg in a 9-year-old include:
1. **Accidental Ingestion**: Repeated consumption of contaminated food or drinks (e.g., 1–10 mg/day) over 90 days in a household with rampant cocaine use.
2. **Deliberate Administration**: Intentional dosing by a caregiver or third party (e.g., 10–50 mg, 3–5 times/week) over weeks, suggesting abuse or neglect.
3. **Self-Ingestion**: Sporadic consumption of accessible cocaine (e.g., 5–20 mg, 1–3 times/week) due to curiosity or mistake in an unsupervised environment.
These scenarios require chronic exposure, as a single ingestion event, even of a large dose, is unlikely to produce such an extreme concentration. The presence of BZE in the hair test would confirm ingestion over environmental exposure. Given the severity of the result and the child’s age, any of these scenarios raises urgent safeguarding concerns, warranting immediate investigation by authorities and consultation with a forensic toxicologist for precise interpretation.
If you need further analysis or specific details (e.g., segmental hair testing to pinpoint timing), please let me know. For case-specific concerns, contacting child protective services or a toxicology expert is critical.
### Key Context
- **Test Result**: Over 5,000 ng/mg is far above the Society of Hair Testing (SoHT) cutoff for cocaine (0.5 ng/mg) and its metabolite benzoylecgonine (BZE, 0.05 ng/mg). Typical concentrations from active use range from 0.1–131 ng/mg, with 5,000 ng/mg indicating extreme exposure, likely repeated and high-dose ingestion.
- **Hair Testing Window**: A 1.5-inch hair sample reflects approximately 90 days of exposure (hair grows ~1 cm/month). Drugs take 4–7 days to appear in hair above the scalp, so the result reflects repeated exposure over weeks to months.
- **Child Factors**: A 9-year-old (~28–30 kg) has a smaller body mass and potentially faster metabolism than adults, affecting cocaine pharmacokinetics. Lethal doses for children are lower (0.2–1.2 g), making chronic ingestion scenarios particularly dangerous.
### Potential Ingestion Scenarios
The following scenarios could theoretically lead to a hair cocaine concentration exceeding 5,000 ng/mg, assuming repeated exposure over the 90-day detection window. Each scenario considers the amount, frequency, and context of ingestion, with the caveat that exact doses are difficult to quantify due to variability in metabolism, hair incorporation, and limited pediatric data.
1. **Accidental Ingestion via Contaminated Substances**:
- **Scenario**: The child unknowingly consumes food, drinks, or medications contaminated with cocaine. For example, cocaine residue on surfaces (e.g., kitchen counters, utensils) in a household with heavy drug use could contaminate food or beverages, leading to small but repeated ingestions.
- **Amount and Frequency**: Small doses (e.g., 1–10 mg per incident, equivalent to 1,000–10,000 ng) consumed daily or several times weekly over 90 days could accumulate in hair. For instance, ingesting 5 mg/day (5,000 ng/day) for 60 days totals 300 mg, potentially sufficient to reach 5,000 ng/mg in hair, depending on incorporation efficiency.
- **Mechanism**: Cocaine enters the bloodstream, is metabolized into BZE, and is incorporated into hair follicles. Repeated low-dose exposure could build high concentrations over time, especially in darker hair with higher melanin content.
- **Likelihood**: Possible in a household with poor hygiene and rampant cocaine use, but achieving 5,000 ng/mg would require consistent, significant contamination. Environmental exposure alone (e.g., touching residue) is unlikely to produce such high levels, as washing protocols should remove external cocaine.
- **Indicators**: High BZE levels in the hair test would confirm ingestion, as BZE is a metabolite produced only in the body.
2. **Deliberate Administration by a Caregiver or Third Party**:
- **Scenario**: A caregiver, family member, or other individual intentionally administers cocaine to the child, possibly mixed into food, drinks, or disguised as medication. This could occur in cases of abuse, neglect, or misguided attempts to sedate or control the child.
- **Amount and Frequency**: Doses of 10–50 mg per incident (10,000–50,000 ng), administered multiple times weekly (e.g., 3–5 times/week) over 90 days, could lead to 5,000 ng/mg. For example, 20 mg ingested 4 times weekly for 12 weeks totals ~960 mg, a cumulative dose that could produce extreme hair concentrations.
- **Mechanism**: Chronic ingestion ensures steady incorporation of cocaine and BZE into hair via the bloodstream. The high result suggests frequent dosing, as single or sporadic doses (even large ones) are less likely to produce such elevated levels.
- **Likelihood**: Disturbingly plausible in cases of abuse or neglect, especially in environments with known drug use. The high concentration suggests intentional or reckless administration rather than incidental exposure.
- **Indicators**: Consistent high doses would produce significant BZE and norcocaine in hair, strongly indicating ingestion. This scenario would likely trigger immediate safeguarding concerns.
3. **Self-Ingestion Due to Access in a Drug-Using Environment**:
- **Scenario**: The child finds and ingests cocaine accessible in the home (e.g., powder, pills, or residue mistaken for candy or another substance). This could occur in a household with unsecured drugs and inadequate supervision.
- **Amount and Frequency**: Variable doses (e.g., 5–20 mg per incident) consumed sporadically but repeatedly (e.g., 1–3 times weekly) over 90 days could accumulate. For example, 10 mg ingested twice weekly for 90 days totals ~360 mg, potentially sufficient for high hair concentrations.
- **Mechanism**: Similar to other ingestion scenarios, cocaine is metabolized and incorporated into hair. Sporadic but frequent ingestion could still produce a high cumulative concentration, especially if the child has high melanin content in hair.
- **Likelihood**: Less likely than accidental or deliberate administration, as a 9-year-old is unlikely to seek out cocaine intentionally. However, curiosity or mistaking the substance for something else (e.g., sugar) could lead to ingestion in a chaotic environment.
- **Indicators**: High BZE levels and a pattern of exposure (segmental hair analysis showing consistent drug presence) would support ingestion over environmental contact.
4. **Chronic Exposure Through Breast Milk or Shared Substances (Unlikely)**:
- **Scenario**: If the child were exposed to cocaine via breast milk from a using caregiver or through shared substances (e.g., contaminated pacifiers, bottles), small amounts could be ingested over time. This is less relevant for a 9-year-old, who is unlikely to be breastfed, but could apply to shared items in rare cases.
- **Amount and Frequency**: Very small doses (e.g., 0.1–1 mg per incident) via milk or shared items, consumed daily over 90 days, could accumulate. However, the total dose would likely be too low to reach 5,000 ng/mg.
- **Mechanism**: Low-level ingestion would incorporate trace amounts of cocaine and metabolites into hair, but concentrations would typically be far below 5,000 ng/mg (e.g., 0.1–10 ng/mg).
- **Likelihood**: Highly unlikely for a 9-year-old, as breast milk exposure is age-inappropriate, and shared items would contribute minimal amounts compared to direct ingestion.
### Supporting Factors and Considerations
- **Hair Characteristics**: Darker hair binds cocaine more readily due to higher melanin content, potentially amplifying concentrations. If the child has dark hair, lower doses could still produce high test results.
- **Metabolite Analysis**: The presence of BZE or norcocaine in the hair (especially at high ratios) confirms ingestion, as these are not present in environmental cocaine. A 5,000 ng/mg result with significant BZE strongly points to ingestion rather than skin contact.
- **Testing Protocols**: Inadequate washing or contamination during testing could inflate results, but reputable labs follow SoHT guidelines to minimize false positives. The reported level (over 5,000 ng/mg) is so high that it likely reflects true incorporation via ingestion.
- **Pharmacokinetics in Children**: A 9-year-old’s smaller body mass and faster metabolism could lead to higher relative concentrations in hair for a given dose compared to adults, but data is limited due to ethical constraints on pediatric studies.
- **Toxicity Risks**: Even small doses (e.g., 10 mg) can cause symptoms in a child (e.g., agitation, increased heart rate), and chronic ingestion at levels needed for 5,000 ng/mg would pose severe health risks, including seizures or cardiac issues.
### Challenges in Quantification
- **Dose Variability**: Hair concentrations don’t directly correlate with ingested dose due to differences in metabolism, hair growth, and incorporation rates. Studies on adults show wide ranges (e.g., 0.5–50 ng/mg for moderate use), and 5,000 ng/mg is rare even in heavy users.
- **Lack of Pediatric Data**: No studies quantify cocaine doses in children leading to specific hair concentrations, making estimates speculative. The scenarios above extrapolate from adult data and general principles.
- **Environmental Contamination**: While unlikely to produce 5,000 ng/mg, heavy environmental exposure (e.g., living in a home with frequent cocaine use) could contribute to lower-level positives, complicating interpretation without metabolite analysis.
### Conclusion
The most plausible ingestion scenarios leading to a hair cocaine concentration exceeding 5,000 ng/mg in a 9-year-old include:
1. **Accidental Ingestion**: Repeated consumption of contaminated food or drinks (e.g., 1–10 mg/day) over 90 days in a household with rampant cocaine use.
2. **Deliberate Administration**: Intentional dosing by a caregiver or third party (e.g., 10–50 mg, 3–5 times/week) over weeks, suggesting abuse or neglect.
3. **Self-Ingestion**: Sporadic consumption of accessible cocaine (e.g., 5–20 mg, 1–3 times/week) due to curiosity or mistake in an unsupervised environment.
These scenarios require chronic exposure, as a single ingestion event, even of a large dose, is unlikely to produce such an extreme concentration. The presence of BZE in the hair test would confirm ingestion over environmental exposure. Given the severity of the result and the child’s age, any of these scenarios raises urgent safeguarding concerns, warranting immediate investigation by authorities and consultation with a forensic toxicologist for precise interpretation.
If you need further analysis or specific details (e.g., segmental hair testing to pinpoint timing), please let me know. For case-specific concerns, contacting child protective services or a toxicology expert is critical.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2025
My understanding is that Nick's parents cleaned the house for him after the arrest.
1NpuLs
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 5, 2025
he also has/had a black cat called ninja
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2021
Christ just take the L. Whether the amount the kid tested positive for is a reasonably transfersble amount has been discussed to death, it's not a small random technicality. It's one of the main reasons Nick is viewed with disgust at this point.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Even if Nick desperately wanted to keep his mouth shut and had a gun to his head, it would instantly open if a black dick got anywhere near it.
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2018
At least somebody in that house washed their hands once in a while.
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2024
Fucking hoarders, man. I'm surprised they didn't have bedbugs - That's a fucking nightmare to deal with.
This shit really upset me, I don't know why, but... IDK, shit is just heartbreaking. As soon as I read this I stopped finding the situation (Nick being a druggie loser) funny and it just made me sad and angry.
SpergioLeonne
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2022
Deep down he realizes that jail is his last best chance to live his best life with all the gay sex he can handle and then some
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2021
After the new court order, would April’s permission even still be enough?
it’s at the top right (or bottom right) of every thread. It’s the arrows on either side of the little ribbon icon, to go forward or backwards. Each highlighted post also has the arrows at the top right of the text box.
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2024
This is an idea I share as well, but a bit more dramatically. I have a sense that people in the county may want to protect the innocents from a man on the edge of losing control, an addict who was armed and professes to have kill lists. They may be weighing the options of "public interest" versus a 7-victim murder-suicide concern.
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2025
The point isn't about being wrong, the point is that it's a lot of gay whining from people who live in these threads and are upset that every single Farmer isn't up to date with every single detail about Balldo as if he's some obscure cow with a low traffic thread that gets a couple of posts a week. And in all that whining no one bothered to link to whatever posts that have these details that they think are so important that everyone needed to know about them.
I don't care about being wrong about Balldo lore because I don't derive my self worth from how many lolcow factoids I can memorize. I'm fine with being corrected. And I'm very happy to share what I remember or know to others in the threads who are asking questions or mistaken about something without throwing a pissy tantrum that someone was wrong about Rekieta lore. It's very easy to not be MATI and simply provide correct information in those cases. I did a few times already in the last page or two.
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- May 29, 2021
Yes. The court order says indirectly that the video can't be released as a public record because (per their logic) it was never properly brought into the case as evidence.
But the individuals involved in the video still preserve the right to allow its release. The one doesn't really depend on the other at all.
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2024
My guess is it was the sheet number of dildos lying around. Two dickriders with one chud between them are one dick short.
owed to joy
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2023
Fair enough but I'd venture to suggest that publicly displaying her intimate, disgusting and humiliating texts and then continuously publicly discussing her former marriage, their affair and drug use, might count as dragging her back in. Can't imagine her name gets great Google results these days but who knows maybe she's totally unaware.
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2021
10 years and a couple of months (Feb 2015).
I doubt you'd be surprised to learn that a lot of smart people are practical idiots. Or that Nick isn't smart, which he is not, unless you get extra points for hubris and narcissism (no). Undistinguished in high school, undistinguished at a noncompetitive college, undistinguished at every job he's ever had, undistinguished at a low-tier law school, undistinguished (putting it generously) as a lawyer, loud and wrong as a legal commentator, disaster of a parent.
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2017
I actually feel bad for Florida in one respect: One of the reasons they get called retarded so often ("Florida man" jokes) is they have excellent public records laws. It's really not that they are more retarded than any other state. It's just easier to see their retardation.
Okay. Did you watch Sean's evening show the other day (the one he did 90 minutes after Karen Read)? If not, I recommend you do so. He goes over why he thinks the Prosecutor and White (and I guess technically the judge now, after today) are wrong and why the two bodycams were properly presented/introduced/whatever into evidence and the court record (he uses both terms), so as to qualify them as public record.
It's in the second segment, at about the 31 minute mark.
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2025
Ignore it. Have you never learned that lesson from a lolcow?
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2022
She is wholly dedicated to the Discolored Streetmeat lifestyle and most likely has been for years by now...
Most likely, Aaron is playing it fast and loose in a lot of this but he has managed to duck and weave legal liability by sheer retarded luck but also seems intent on at least not making it worse for the kids.
"Lies and slander you dishonest kiwifag! I will have you know that erect men are regularly inside me! I win again!"
The kind of women who still stick around Nicholas the drug-cuck are the same single mothers that invite suspicious men into their lives then go to bat for the suspicious men to the point of testifying in court against their own children even after video and rape-kits proves their children were abused due to their choice in men, the kind of people who cannot be helped.
This is not about Nicholas at this point, I am sure of it. Everyone is trying to protect themselves from losing the benefits of being in the good graces of the Rekieta Crime Family and their oil money. Or even protect themselves, with that kind of small town politics and the riches of the Rekieta Crime Family it would mean that whoever has to take the fall could have their entire family driven out of the county if not the state. The pettiness of small town dynamics in cases like this can be terrifying and it would not be the first time a rich family ruins the lives of an entire bloodline to make a point of not slighting them.
My view is that it is not so much about protecting Nicholas as it is protecting the Rekieta reputation and remaining in the good graces of Bob and Celeste. They hold the county moneybags and can stop donating to, or supporting the businesses and organizations of anyone related to the person or persons considered to be guilty of failing to stop the release of the bodycam footage.
Possibly, but there is no reason to believe they would have to be so direct. With old money like this in small communities it is very easy to keep the donations far away from the goal you are actually paying for. You want a specific judge or sheriff to be elected?
Simple, attend public events and social gatherings, like the Rekieta Crime Family is well known to do, talk up your candidate regularly to powerful and influential people while asking how their grandkids business is doing, perhaps you will shop there in the future?
Ask how their sick relative is doing, maybe they need a better place in a nice hospice, help jumping the line for a spot in a certain hospital wing, or they could use help finding a good doctor? Maybe one of their relatives is organizing a charity or public event, ask about it, promise to attend and invite some of your rich friends to come along, easy.
Maybe their nephew is having problems securing permission to build a new store or house? Promise to mention it to your good friend on the City Board or Mayor as you are having dinner with them next weekend. I could go on describing the basics of small town influence peddling but this is already long winded.
Could be a part of it as well, but I suspect the fear of fallout from the heads of the Rekieta Crime Family's Bob and Celeste is a more urgent worry for them.
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2019
They'll see nick as weak to the bloodline and put his corpse in a oil drum