- Joined
- Oct 1, 2013
Or shut down the site.At this point, the only way that Tropers will tard rage even harder is if Donald Trump decides to ban My Little Pony.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Or shut down the site.At this point, the only way that Tropers will tard rage even harder is if Donald Trump decides to ban My Little Pony.
Well, that escalated rather quickly.
Hate to break it to you, guy, but most "non-binary" people are special snowflakes.
The fuck? Is "daren't" even a word?!
The fuck? Is "daren't" even a word?!
Sounds like some archaeic colloquialism you'd find in Shakespeare or something. Troper are notoriously obsessed with their own intelligence and this guy probably thought he was really smart and eloquent for using that word.
Remember, TV Tropes' active community is made up almost exclusively of people like Dobson and MovieBob.
Which is funny because last I checked (a few years ago) MovieBlob had like a dozen negative reviews on the site.Remember, TV Tropes' active community is made up almost exclusively of people like Dobson and MovieBob.
Which is funny because last I checked (a few years ago) MovieBlob had like a dozen negative reviews on the site.
Who are you kidding? TV Tropes don't like being a meanie to others.Can they put them back
"There have been lots of people throughout time that hated special snowflakes to the point of campaigns of genocide."
eyebags have been getting worse, too.
Sounds like some archaeic colloquialism you'd find in Shakespeare or something. Troper are notoriously obsessed with their own intelligence and this guy probably thought he was really smart and eloquent for using that word..
It's still used here in Britain, it isn't exclusive to upper-class people."Daren't" is indeed a word, though it's kind of an archaic one. (Or British, maybe.)
It's still used here in Britain, it isn't exclusive to upper-class people.
See also: shan't
- Ok follow me on this: Gramps was the Hammerman. Ok, fine. He needs a NEW Hammerman because, somehow, he's gotten to old to use magic...alright no problem. The magic takes a toll on his body, after a while he couldn't contain it any more. Basically the plot to MCU Ant-Man. Hold on. So the theme says "Gramps and HIS GRANDDAUGHTER". Excuse me? He has a granddaughter, meaning he has a son or daughter already? Where are they? Why not give them the shoes? Let's assume it's daughter and he wanted to only pass it to a male, or was forced to even, she has a DAUGHTER! Where is she!? And if it IS a son, where is he? Why leave your kid with your dad and split? Did they die? Are they just deadbeats? Is that why the hypothetical son or daughter is unworthy of the power? We never know because they never even address this. Now, of course, the out-of-universe reason is the same reason why Donald and Scrooge are both 'uncles' and never have kids, or why Pop-Eye and Olive are 'babysitting', or why Jackie is the 'uncle' of Jade in Jackie Chan Adventures and so on—Western cartoons emphasize distant familial relations for some reason. But here it introduces a massive plot hole which is NEVER BROUGHT UP ONCE in the entire show! One which the show, not only draws attention to by putting it in the opening theme, but HINGES on since otherwise Stanley is irrelevant!