Trans Muslimahs - Oppression fetishism rears its ugly headscarf

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Doubtful. Aside from a few young Muslims who clearly suffer from Marxist induced brain damage, Moslems are hella based, and Muslims in the West have actually gotten MORE conservative over time, not less.

It wasn’t that unusual for some of the Moslem “guest workers” who came in the 70ies to occasionally drink alcohol for example, in a way that you’d never see today in a Moslem ghetto.

Moslems in the west today also continually import more based Moslems from the Middle East, and that’s important because the generational shift you see regarding (for example) the alphabet people in the West (younger generations are more likely to be LGBTQZ supporters) doesn’t exist in the Middle East. Young Moslems are more or less just as likely to demand jail time for faggotry as older folks.

And btw: The whole concept of “thoughts aren’t a sin, actions are” is also a Christian concept. Love the sinner, hate the sin and all that.
I hope so man. I’ve seen a lot more good than bad among Muslims in the west. I hope the younger generation that caught the gender ideology brain worm eventually grow out of it and repent
 
I hope so man. I’ve seen a lot more good than bad among Muslims in the west. I hope the younger generation that caught the gender ideology brain worm eventually grow out of it and repent
Just look at the Pew research on attitudes towards gays in the Middle East.

Being pro-gay there basically means: “Yeah, sexual deviants need to be punished. But just jail and not for too-too long! No throwing off buildings!”

And as mentioned previously. They continually import wives and husbands from there. (Though maybe not as often as previously.)
 
I hope so man. I’ve seen a lot more good than bad among Muslims in the west. I hope the younger generation that caught the gender ideology brain worm eventually grow out of it and repent

I think it's pretty clear that what will play out, is that the same rates of detransitioners and those generally repentant for their 'woke ways' will be more-or-less identical among Muslims.

I don't know why people are optimistic about Muslims in general when it comes to combatting any societal downturn. Whether it's record-breaking illiteracy rates, birth defects from inbreeding or some of the highest levels of autism among any ethnic/religious group - there's not a lot about Islam that makes me think it's something to place your hope in.
 
It's weird, because people on the internet keep saying that Islam is somehow completely protected from gender-nonsense and transgenders. Odd.

To anyone paying attention, the abnormally high percentage of Muslim men that fit the "incel" checklist of behaviours and traits has all sorts of disastrous consequences. Extremism and terrorism were one inevitable consequence, falling prey to trans ideology is another.

Muslims in the West sort of remind me of the themes in the Russian science fiction "Solaris". You can't observe something in close proximity without being ultimately changed by it.

This was my long-winded way of saying everyone is equally fucked.
To sperg on it, culture has it's own kind of autism. Western being more rich and more inclined to individualism (a comcept of Latine Christianity btw) fall to gender autism, which also seems te be the extreme kind of individualism. If person X (an individual) identifies as XER, we must repect the choice of that individual, because individuality is uber alles. And if validation and respect requires males in female toiletts or for us to dismantle let's say biology, well...biology must go.

Islam on the other hand is all about restrictions and order, also it is extremly passionary religion due to huge amount of young hobo-like individuals of male sex. It's not a wonder that Islam came out with the idea of Jihad, because the whole system just reminds of army. Their autism manifests in terrorism (a direct action against the enemy if we follow Kropotkin) and toilet rules (ritualisation of each action possible). Islam (most of it, sufi aside) is not about respect for an individual, that's why the scientific and economic progress of Islam world has been quite shitty.
 
It's not a wonder that Islam came out with the idea of Jihad, because the whole system just reminds of army.
Would highly recommend 'In God's Path' by Robert Hoyland. Islam reminds you of an army, because it is a religion of conquest and conquest only

Edit: for the record, I think all the Abrahamic religions are, Islam is just more so than the other two
 

1691327456314.png


A Michigan man who identifies as both transgender and Muslim has filed a legal claim against his ex-boyfriend demanding the return of his amputated testicles which he says are being kept in a jar in the refrigerator.

Brianna Kingsley, 40, filed the claim against William Wojciechowski, 37, in Pontiac’s 50th District Court on Thursday. In a handwritten affidavit, Kingsley wrote: “Defendant retains possession of my surgically extracted testicles, preserved in [a] Mason jar, kept in [the] fridge next to the eggs. Demand immediate return of my human remains specimen and damages of $6,500.”

Kingsley is also known as Zahrah Bri-Zee Muharib on social media, an Arabic name, and appears to have recently converted to Islam.

In April, Kingsley uploaded a video to his TikTok account titled “The Unboxing of Dee’s Nutz,” which depicts him removing a clear bag with a biohazard label while wearing a lace veil and a pink dress.

The video is captioned, “Transgender woman unboxes her surgically extracted lady balls that was [sic] packaged by the Hospital that performed her gender-affirming bottom surgery.” Smiling and laughing, Kingsley holds up the bag containing his testicles before returning them to the box and performing a curtsy. In the background behind him, a painting of a nude woman with testicles can be seen.

Wojciechowski told The Detroit News that Kingsley had been harassing him for the past eight months since their split. Using “she/her” pronouns to refer to Kingsley, Wojciechowski said “I’ll be telling my lawyer about this because it’s getting ridiculous. I don’t owe her anything. She’s been harassing me ever since we broke up. I had to take out a PPO against her.”

The personal protection order against Kingsley was signed by Oakland County Circuit Court Judge Lisa Gorcyca on December 13, 2022, just two weeks after the couple’s breakup. The order remains in effect for a year after its issuance date, and in the document Wojciechowski claimed Kingsley threatened to harm him and had harassed with him at his workplace.

In a recent Facebook post, Wojciechowski shared The Detroit News article concerning the litigation against him, stating, “Here’s the latest on Brianna Kingsley and the harassment she is putting me through. Please feel free to share and spread the word.”

One individual who responded to the article commented, “I hope you finally get relief from her incessant crap. JFC she uses everyone then turns on them in a fiery rage. You deserve peace.”

After their falling out, Wojciechowski alleges that Kingsley abducted his two dogs and held them for several weeks. In a Facebook post, he writes that Kingsley violated the protective order he’d lodged against him by visiting his home in February, at which time Kingsley “stole them [the dogs] out of my front yard on Valentine’s Day.”

“I’m still moving forward with the charges against Brianna Kingsley. She violated the PPO I have on her by taking my dogs,” Wojciechowski stated the following month after having recovered the animals.

“She needs to be held accountable for her actions no matter what. The dogs are OK, but they do show more fear and aggression since they were taken. Especially Butch. He keeps pulling his head up and away when I try to pet under his chin. Which tells me that his whining and barking triggered Brianna and she punished him for it,” Wojciechowski said.

According to his Facebook profile, Kingsley organized a “queer night” event in 2019 where he performed at a strip club in Ypsilanti. The event, titled “First Fully Nude Transsexual Stripper,” was held in October that year and co-hosted by a local burlesque dancer.

In a post made to his Facebook last month, Kingsley boasts of undergoing a mammogram as a “rite of passage” at Regional Medical Imaging Center in Royal Oak. Kingsley describes how a female nurse “deftly maneuvered my right 50DD breast into the imaging clamp” before the “robot squeezed my masses, these glorious udders of breast tissue.” He brags about enjoying the experience and “fly-fishing for validation” from the nurse after she “finished imaging both my breasts.”

“Some of us are gifted by spirit, specifically us transgender people, with rare talents and abilities, perceptions and discernments, visions and dreams, that more than 95% of folk do NOT have so they mock us, exile us, and kill us with their apathy,” Kingsley wrote in April.

“Transgender people are more than just the butt of the jokes you make, the ones you let slide unopposed; we are an increasingly endangered species broaching the brink of extinction, hunted for sport in front of your very eyes,” he added.

Other social media posts by Kingsley indicate that an altercation had occurred between him and members of LGBT Detroit. In one post that was shared by Kingsley on his TikTok account, a man who appears to be affiliated with the group accuses Kingsley of vandalizing property belonging to the organization. In a video created by Kingsley for TikTok, he claims to have prevented the trans activist group from receiving a $30,000 grant offered by the Human Rights Campaign.

Kingsley was previously arrested in 2019 for threatening a trans-identifying male roommate with a knife at their residence on Christmas day. Local outlet Royal Oak Tribune refers to Kingsley as a “woman” who brandished a 6-inch blade during the dispute.

“In the kitchen, Kingsley grabbed a knife with a 6-inch blade and told the victim to leave the house,” a police officer told the press. “When the victim didn’t immediately comply, the suspect held the knife above her head in a threatening manner.”

Kingsley was held in the Oakland County Jail under his male name and in the men’s section, separated from other inmates. He was charged with felony assault, which is punishable by up to four years in prison and a $2,000 fine. He pleaded guilty to misdemeanor assault in October 2020 and was sentenced to two months in jail.
 
Interestingly, there is another side to the coin when it comes to this. I rarely ever log in but I had to when I saw this thread. Basically, there are aidens I've seen who still wear the headrag stuff, believe it or not. I wish to God I had screenshots but I saw them years and years ago on tumblr. There is retarded art of wheelchair trans men in ninja gear out there, with accompanying text affirmations saying stuff like "gender is subjective, you can still cover your hair as a man if this is how you wish to honor Allah" and talking about how they're doing it in a totes masc way. Definitely up there as some of the funniest shit I've seen and hard to believe was real when I first saw it. They can't escape their female upbringings and minds and were essentially all hug boxing each other to make the mean feeling of cognitive dissonance go away. Even as these women were injecting T, binding, calling themselves male pronouns, they couldn't bear to take off the headscarf. Amazing. I do feel sorry for them though, it makes sense that if your parents beat you as a kid for not covering up every inch of your body that you'd want to be the sex that isn't expected to do that. Its just mental that they can't see that thats why they wanted to be men, and that the compulsion in them to wear the headscarf is *that* strong. I guess if you never left the house without it from a young age, it would feel like nudity to take it off.
 
Nah man, that’s bullshit. Sorry. Muslim countries, especially in the gulf where mere possession of alcohol is illegal, take that shit seriously.

Most of the alcohol and drugs smuggled there, is for the expatriate communities and foreign workers.
Having spent a year in Abu Dhabi, I can say this is not the case there at least. Sure, it's illegal for Muslims there to enter a liquor store, but most have loopholes around this (curbside, basically) and every time I went to the one near me, there was always at least one Emirati outside honking his horn waiting for the clerk to come outside
 
Jannisaries.
Or Trannisaries.
Jannisaries weren't eunuchs, since eunuchs make for shitty soldiers. They were supposed to be celibate and have no family ties, but many in the later era of the Ottoman Empire (when they were the power behind the throne) openly had wives and children, dynasties of their own, and a few even still had ties with their original Christian families (one even used his influence and position of power behind the throne to get his brother elected and enthroned as Patriarch of Constantinople)
 
The whole concept of “thoughts aren’t a sin, actions are” is also a Christian concept. .
It is not. The NT makes it very clear that there's no difference between sinful thoughts and sinful actions. Matthew 5:28, etc.
The concept of "Hate the sin but love the sinner" is found nowhere in Scripture. It was invented by American evangelicals so they wouldn't have to have difficult conversations with people doing wicked things, rather than correctly ejecting them from the congregation.
 
(Speaking from an Eastern Orthodox perspective)
It is not. The NT makes it very clear that there's no difference between sinful thoughts and sinful actions. Matthew 5:28, etc.
While sinful thoughts are still sinful (as sin, properly understood, is a spiritual disease), there's definitely a difference in terms of severity of action and of thought. The point of Matthew 5:28 is that even if not acted on, such thoughts are of the same underlying spiritual issues and desires.
The concept of "Hate the sin but love the sinner" is found nowhere in Scripture. It was invented by American evangelicals so they wouldn't have to have difficult conversations with people doing wicked things, rather than correctly ejecting them from the congregation.
It's not direct from scripture, but the principles behind it are, and it goes back WAY before Protestantism, let alone American Evangelicalism. St Augustine was the first to say it that we know of ("Cum dilectione hominum et odio vitiorum"), and the idea is expressed in some other patristic writings as well. Serious sins still warrant excommunication (if severe) or expulsion from the congregation (if REALLY severe) if the person is unrepentant, but the door should always be open for reconciliation (if they choose to repent) and their repentance is something to pray for.

But yes, far too many people just use the phrase as an excuse to avoid difficult conversations, even if that's not what it was supposed to be. Same goes for "Judge not, that ye be not judged" (which is also typically used completely out of its proper context).
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom