According to the woke, Chris Hansen was evil for exposing those poor pedos.
A waste of money and time.
You mean financially? No, years ago, there were some leaks that revealed that Sunset Overdrive hadn't made them any money either. That game had a mostly decent critical reception, though.
All women in this game are hand-crafted fugly by the devs. But Jean Gray is ironically somehow the least ugliest (in a "one-eyed king" kinda way).
The prophecy was real.
Welcome back, Dragon Age: Veilguard and Forspoken! It's like you never left us!GoW Laufey preorders begin Sept 29th, what horrible costumes
View attachment 9627755
I knew i had seen that blue armor somewhere before
View attachment 9627758
You can also pay a bit more and get the girlboss edition with bisexual colors costume and the dildo sword
View attachment 9627783
I like it
Oh, I agree, I'm just saying it's still not sustainable, no matter how hard they wish, and how much "magic" they think they wield to print more money. It's not infinite, no matter what tricks they apply. There is an end to it. Every failure that burns hundreds of millions of dollars has to come out of someone's pocket, even if that "someone" is a giant hedge fund with a trillion dollars of assets or whatever, and even if it's just a "blip," blips add up.
Cop's a faggot. This'll get dismissed just for retardation prima facie before it even gets filed. If they're dumb enough to actually prosecute this shit, even a junior paralegal at a basic-bitch law firm in criminal defense could nuke this bullshit from orbit.
The late silent film actress Lillian Gish once said that film is very powerful as it could enrich mankind but she warned that people must be careful of what and how they portray with that media. She was right on the money, hence the above.I've said it a few times but it bears repeating: these subhumans have no room to talk about others being pedophiles simply for wanting attractive women in media when they gave
^this shit rave reviews.
THEY HAD KELLY FUCKING HU AVAILABLE AND THEY BARELY USED HER
The problem is that it does sell. Allegedly Snoyverine has sold 1.9 million copies for an estimated gross revenue of $130M. If we assume this is true, and that the game had a typical revenue split (30% to Sony 70% to the studio) then they would have made $91M. If we give the game the budget of the famously expensive MGSV, about $80M, then it would have been profitable excluding marketing. If you choose not to believe those numbers, the about equally woke and ugly Snoyderman 2, regardless of whether or not it was actually profitable, sold well and was generally well received. The famously unsuccessful woke film The Marvels made a global box office of $206M. While the success of at least two of these was reduced for reasons that are related to "anti-woke" backlash, they all would have been profitable with lower budgets, and there are only 82 video games on the PS2, the best-selling video game console ever, with 1.9M or more sales (and the old Spiderman 2 only sold 1.93M). The fact of the matter is that antiwoke backlash is basically arbitrary and has a questionable affect on sales. Did Concord flop because it was woke? In a way, yes, but more accurately it was simply unappealing. Marathon was almost an equal flop, and I haven't heard anything about it being woke, it's just unappealing. The people funding these games are trying to make money, they just don't know why people like video games, and their understanding of market forces is basically "big budget + looks AAA = money + risk". They might have an opinion on Wolverine's character design, but they don't know why people like video games, and they've been assured that it's a great design made by top talent.
PS2 era didn't have goypass equivalents which is how the shit games are used with projection charts to con the shareholders, so much so they avoid using the word "bought" but rather "played" if you look at asscreed: nigger in japan copes ubisoft kept bringing to the shareholders, your meandering of movie shit also doesn't make any sense either, we are talking about games.
It's a classic case of the left calling anyone they don't like a pedophile to discredit and make them a pariah but will deny deny deny if it's one of their own caught being a pedo.
It isn't even one of their own. They are treating pedos as the worst thing that comes to their mind and a bunch of victims hurt by other AT THE SAME TIME! How do they square that circle?
This has basically been a problem ever since...SF2 ironically enough. It's why the genre sucks so much to play. Doesn't help that the skill entry to one is fucking insane. If I were locked up in a room and forced to finish either ikaruga or SSF2TE to escape. I would go for ikaruga.
Apparently my post was very difficult to understand for some people. In any other context Snoyverine would be a successful and popular video game, and it's pure cope to claim that "woke shit doesn't sell." Snoyverine is about as bad as a AAA video game could possibly be, and it has apparently sold 1.9 million copies, and while that is obviously below expectations, and if the game was better they would have sold more, 1.9 million makes it one of the best selling video games ever, and if its budget was more reasonable it would be a financial success. This is why companies are not abandoning "woke shit," because it does sell, and even with ballooned budgets and ever declining quality, they can still be financial successes. "Woke shit" will eventually go away, but the purely financial incentive does not exist to remove it.
i really don't get you going to one thing then to the other trying to make them work together, vulvarine is being mocked for a myriad of reasons and hitting the woke checkmarks is one of them, there hasn't been any mentions if it made back the 305M development cost.
I was specifically responding to a post made by @regalterry claiming that the companies must not be trying to make money because they keep making woke games. I pointed out that these woke games do make money and sell well, what exactly is there to misunderstand? Wolverine is a financial failure and an embarrassment, but it could have been a successful embarrassment in different circumstances like an NBA 2k game. In business, it's completely normal for one investment to fail and another to succeed, it doesn't mean that the category of investment is bad. I'm simply trying to explain why these companies are in fact trying to make money and are not acting as dumb as they may seem, not trying to explain why the games are bad. Obviously, we all know the reason for that: the people making the games are incompetent, the companies are bloated to the point that coordinating teams is almost impossible, and there is a huge reliance on outside contractors.
