Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I have enjoyed Brutal Legend starring Jack Black.jpg
 
Lookie-lou said:
many such cases, but at either rate I missed the train on this one. For years I thought this entire controversy about JK being an 'ebil terv' was just because she refused to apologise or even acknowledge their 'grievances'., Yellow press era we live in makes all headlines hyperbole to my ears.

But no, the truth was better, woman had drawn a line in the sand and was punching at all groomers whom took the challenge. Still not a fan, but have to respect 2nd wavers for holding resolute.
Click to expand...
It's gotten to a point where they will not allow her to move on, just as much as she refuses to step aside and let the mafia run wild. That image I posted? That's the fantasy, they want another reason to oppose Rowling because clearly the well is running dry on current material. That's also why they call her Hitler or a holocaust denier every month.
 
Der weiße Teufel said:
There was a guy who said that she cannot be trusted around children and one "actor" who called her a nazi or at least "aligned with their views". There were a lot of "it's JKR's fault!!!" tweets regarding Ghey's murder, but as far as I can tell she never did anything against them.
Click to expand...
Found it, it was the "JKR is a holocaust denier". She didnt like that lol.
holyhandgrenade said:
L|A of the picture in the post above mine

For some reason the troons have decided to use r/facepalm for their histrionics twice today second time featuring our boy Alex with his twitter handle curiously redacted. Both posts have a ton of totally organic engagement, and a lot of normies calling them out.
View attachment 5911797
L|A

p.s. thumbnail your images ffs
Click to expand...
More here. Good times.
 
“Why didn’t she show a single werewolf living a normal life or having good self esteem?”

Yes, “Alan the Werewolf does his laundry and proudly contemplates his volunteer work and the difference he’s made in the local community on a grass-roots level“ would have been a thrilling chapter. It’s truly a mystery why there aren’t any blockbuster novels by woke authors.
 
The werewolves in the books weren't happy and lived miserably due to the fact that they would become savage monsters once a month, who would happily kill and devour their own loved ones without a second thought.
I guess you can make the AIDS claim, only they took it the wrong way: having AIDS is a dreadful disease ('curse'), which causes painful degeneration of the body and eventually death, sparing no one and leaving your loved ones behind. It's not something you should see in a positive light, but the kinds of people who refuse to see it as a negative are the ones who willingly spread it and do mothing to prevent it, thus the feeling of being 'attacked' by JK over the Fenrir Graymane character.
 
Mao Hao Hao said:
The werewolves in the books weren't happy and lived miserably due to the fact that they would become savage monsters once a month, who would happily kill and devour their own loved ones without a second thought.
I guess you can make the AIDS claim, only they took it the wrong way: having AIDS is a dreadful disease ('curse'), which causes painful degeneration of the body and eventually death, sparing no one and leaving your loved ones behind. It's not something you should see in a positive light, but the kinds of people who refuse to see it as a negative are the ones who willingly spread it and do mothing to prevent it, thus the feeling of being 'attacked' by JK over the Fenrir Graymane character.
Click to expand...
I'm retarded, because I just made the connection between Fenrir and those psychos who intentionally go out and infect people with HIV. Probably because when I read the books, I wasn't aware of that phenomenon, and by the time I was aware, I hadn't read the books in awhile.
 
Silence of the Troons said:
Rowling hates race-mixing and Jews:
View attachment 6443478
Click to expand...
I know this is exactly how troons (and other extremist belief-holders) operate, but it's still a little surprising and disturbing to see how readily people believe and accept allegations that XYZ person must believe (insert horrible thing here) because "people like them" believe "that sort of thing".

JKR has never been anything but supportive of gay rights - in fact, she's more supportive than troons and trans activists, since they think homosexuality isn't real at all and that heterosexual people can "identify" as gay/lesbian - but because the troons don't like her, she's obviously a massive homophobe who believes AIDS is "the gay disease" (despite her heroic werewolf character/AIDS sufferer analogue being straight) and also a huge racist who thinks "race-mixing" is wrong (despite her books having many interracial couples). Sure, she's never said these things... but she totally, definitely believes them... because she feels to them like the kind of person who would believe these things! That totally makes sense.

Also, dear JKR haters: The books clearly demonstrate that people using the term "mudblood" are wrong and bigots. It's literally a term used by villainous characters to indicate their villainy. The heroes not only don't use that term except when referring to other people using it, they openly disdain and are disgusted by people who use that term. It's crystal clear that JKR wrote the book with the intended message that being a racist douchebag who calls people things like "mudblood" is bad and wrong. But then, reading comprehension has never been your specialty.

Relatedly, it still boggles my mind how poor reading comprehension is these days, especially amongst the gender special set. We're talking here about books that are aimed at an audience of grade schoolers - they're very direct in their morality, but these people just can't understand what they're trying to tell us. "Oh, obviously JKR supports the Nazis because the bad guys in her books are basically Nazi analogues!" ...okay but they're the bad guys, and the entire book series spends a ton of time and how and why their beliefs are wrong, and the moral message of the books is that having those beliefs is bad and wrong... how did you come out of it thinking she portrayed the Nazis as right/sympathetic/good? I don't think these idiots even read the books but if they did, wow.

Mao Hao Hao said:
The werewolves in the books weren't happy and lived miserably due to the fact that they would become savage monsters once a month, who would happily kill and devour their own loved ones without a second thought.
I guess you can make the AIDS claim, only they took it the wrong way: having AIDS is a dreadful disease ('curse'), which causes painful degeneration of the body and eventually death, sparing no one and leaving your loved ones behind. It's not something you should see in a positive light, but the kinds of people who refuse to see it as a negative are the ones who willingly spread it and do mothing to prevent it, thus the feeling of being 'attacked' by JK over the Fenrir Graymane character.
Click to expand...
The entire point of the inclusion of a heroic werewolf character in the story was largely that you should accept people and respect them and their humanity no matter what, even if they have an unfortunate and sometimes dangerous health condition. And that's a really good message, especially since at the time the books were being written and published, people with HIV/AIDS were still treated like lepers at best, monsters at worst. It's a kid-friendly way of communicating that just because someone has a communicable disease, that doesn't mean you should shun, harass or abuse them, and that they are human just like everybody else. And that's true, and good!

I don't honestly think the Fenrir Graymane character was meant to depict HIV/AIDS users as intentionally spreading the disease, or all being pedophiles, or whatever the troons like to claim. I think he was meant to represent the fact that many, if not most HIV/AIDS sufferers contracted the disease largely through no fault of their own. He's a character meant to represent a random act of violence that had horrible consequences for the heroic character Remus Lupin. He represents the fact that Remus didn't do anything wrong at all and still ended up with fantasy HIV, just like many real people don't do anything wrong and end up with actual HIV.

Troons have such absolutely piss-poor reading comprehension but they still want to read more into this shit than is actually textually there. It's bizarre.
 
Sourceress said:
Troons have such absolutely piss-poor reading comprehension but they still want to read more into this shit than is actually textually there. It's bizarre.
Click to expand...
I think you're assuming ignorance on their part. JKR is a Bad Person, so everything in her history has to be retconned to prove that she is--and always was--a Bad Person. They want to believe these lies are true because the lie reinforces their own beliefs, which they hang onto like an addiction.
 
I believe Der weiße Teufel referred to this:

JK Rowling wins apology from trans activist who called her a Nazi in Twitter thread
A trans activist has been forced to apologise to Harry Potter author JK Rowling after likening her to a Nazi.

Self described "Actor, Drag Queen, Jazz Hands Enthusiast" JJ Welles took to Twitter to admit he went too far in comparing the beloved children's author to 'the far right'.
Click to expand...

And this:

J.K. Rowling threatens legal action against Coquitlam transgender activist over tweets

Nicola Spurling, a Coquitlam-based entrepreneur, LGBTQ2+ advocate and former Green Party candidate, on Tuesday tweeted a link to an article from the Guardian about Rowling’s new children’s book.

In the now-deleted tweet, Spurling added the caption, “Definitely something to keep a close eye on. In recent years, Rowling has made it clear that she can no longer be trusted around children.”
Click to expand...

Spurling had to delete his tweet but continues to claim that Rowling intimidated him for "calling out her transphobia".

He is clearly a specialist in safety as a male who plays soccer and hockey in female teams (front centre in the photo).

hockey nicola spurling.jpg
 
RonRiot said:
“Why didn’t she show a single werewolf living a normal life or having good self esteem?”

Yes, “Alan the Werewolf does his laundry and proudly contemplates his volunteer work and the difference he’s made in the local community on a grass-roots level“ would have been a thrilling chapter. It’s truly a mystery why there aren’t any blockbuster novels by woke authors.
Click to expand...

If she had written it that way, they would have accused her of using her white cis privilege to trivialize AIDS, and she would therefore be worse than Hitler.
 
Battlefield2142EU said:
View attachment 6449829
Anti-JK Rowling articles getting dumber or AI getting better at writing them?
Click to expand...

So those two characters are anti-trans caricatures?

Is it because most self-respecting women IRL don't act the way they do, more specifically Umbridge's unhealthy and hypocritical obsession with sugary sweet/cute stuff?

Or is it because Umbridge specifically is, canonically, ugly enough to be performed by some creepy old man in drag?
 
Battlefield2142EU said:
View attachment 6449829
Anti-JK Rowling articles getting dumber or AI getting better at writing them?
Click to expand...
I can imagine why those characters MAY not be featured in the series and that's that the series won't get that far.

Rita Skeeter to my recollection first shows up in the fourth book and Umbridge shows up in the fifth though she is a much more important character than Rita.

Who reads these articles? Even the headline is just speculation with it's use of MAY.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom