Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I can imagine why those characters MAY not be featured in the series and that's that the series won't get that far.

Rita Skeeter to my recollection first shows up in the fourth book and Umbridge shows up in the fifth though she is a much more important character than Rita.

Who reads these articles? Even the headline is just speculation with it's use of MAY.

Rita Skeeter is surprisingly important as a character, though.

She's a "journalist" who is obsessed with writing fake news, and doubles down even as Harry can see her notes and repeatedly corrects her on it.
 
Rita Skeeter is surprisingly important as a character, though.

She's a "journalist" who is obsessed with writing fake news, and doubles down even as Harry can see her notes and repeatedly corrects her on it.
Yeah she appears quite a bit but my point was she is easily written out with another journoscum character or some other guy can fulfill her role too.
At the end of the day she is just another character who bullies Harry and there's already loads of those.
 
View attachment 6449829
Anti-JK Rowling articles getting dumber or AI getting better at writing them?
Trannies saw two awful, ugly, mannish (in case of Skeeter) women, who keep lying and abuse kids, while being catered to and enabled by the media/government, and said "omg, she's literally me, fr fr".

AI can't replace journalists quickly enough, tbh. We won't see any difference anyway.
 
AI can't replace journalists quickly enough, tbh. We won't see any difference anyway.
Hey now, Sometimes AI has hallucinations where it basically just makes up a bullshit wholesale, sometimes it'll even fake sources! Thats nothing like a journ---
...
........
Nevermind. Good point. 👍
 
“Why didn’t she show a single werewolf living a normal life or having good self esteem?”

Yes, “Alan the Werewolf does his laundry and proudly contemplates his volunteer work and the difference he’s made in the local community on a grass-roots level“ would have been a thrilling chapter. It’s truly a mystery why there aren’t any blockbuster novels by woke authors.
Lupin does lead a fairly normal life. He drinks a potion and locks himself in his office one night a month, but the weirdness in his life mostly comes from being involved in a wizard civil war, not the fact that he’s a werewolf. The only other thing that I can think of (other than specific anti-werewolf bias) is not wanting to have a children with Tonks because it might inherit lycanthropy. But that works perfectly with the AIDS metaphor because HIV can be spread in vitro (mother-to-child, not father-to-child, but the point still stands). Treatment can significantly reduce the chances of spreading it to the child, but not enough to make it safe by any means.
 
Have these two been seen as tranny caricatures for a while before this article? This is the first time I've heard of such a bizarre comparison.
Rowling didn't even know what a tranny was when she wrote the books.
 
Have these two been seen as tranny caricatures for a while before this article? This is the first time I've heard of such a bizarre comparison.
When I read the books Umbridge was described as toadlike and Skeeter buglike (as her Animagus form demonstrates). If troons are seeing themselves in those descriptions they should ask themselves why they think like that.
 
Umbridge is going nowhere; the Harry Potter themed ride at Epic Universe (the new Universal Orlando park) features her and Imelda Staunton even came back to play her.

The “Rita Skeeter is a parody of a trans woman” is yet another social-media-fueled bad attempt at a queer reading, like the goblins being Jews or that Jo is racist because she has characters named Kingsley Shacklebolt, Cho Chang, and Seamus Finnegan. There is no evidence at all to make any of these assertions, but these people are so busy huffing their own farts that they don’t care. Unfortunately, this garbage has spread so far and wide that I’m not sure if it’s even worth it to try to correct the record, but the good part is that the vast, vast majority of normie Harry Potter fans (which is like, everyone) do not give a shit and have the same response as all of us do.
 
Umbridge is the lady they like to say got raped by centaurs.
1727217783953.png

And here's the nosey reporter.
1727217853330.png
 
When I read the books Umbridge was described as toadlike and Skeeter buglike (as her Animagus form demonstrates). If troons are seeing themselves in those descriptions they should ask themselves why they think like that.
Skeeter also had "mannish hands". So did a major villain from The Silkworm.
 
I just discovered the r/EnoughJKRowling subreddit and found this thread where the user insists that Rowling secretly hates gay men, because out of two named werewolves (lycanthropy in this case being an analogy for AIDS) in the series only one character is good and she didn't propose a solution to the discrimination against werewolves.
https://old.reddit.com/r/EnoughJKRowling/comments/1fm4mcl/lets_talk_about_the_werewolves/
https://archive.md/6ZC1d
View attachment 6443476
View attachment 6443477
Rowling hates race-mixing and Jews:
View attachment 6443478
View attachment 6443485
They (Rowling and Parker and the other literal Nazis) consider AIDS an African plague, from black rapists who raped white women after having sex with monkeys and that's how white women and then straight men got it. Mudblood has many different meanings. White blood muddled with black blood, it goes back to the not considering those different to her human or of worth.
What book did these people read? Did The Turner Diaries and Mein Kampf accidentally get put into the Children's Fantasy section?
 
I did a search for "Mike Hawksmissing" and I got two "4plebs" and one 4chan hit. No articles, no nothing.
Am I the one missing something? "Mike Hawksmissing" wrote an article peddling fake outrage on behalf of troons aka guys with cocks missing. It's a funny joke/trolling of the website that has posted it. Or not? Is it not that?
 
View attachment 6449829
Anti-JK Rowling articles getting dumber or AI getting better at writing them?

What?! The letter people's pertinacity for imagining that everything is an allegory for themselves keeps getting more and more retarded. I can't even guess at what the hell they see in Umbridge.. She just seems like your typical sociopathic upper middle aged British bitch woman archetype turned up to 11.

Actually, now that i think of it.. They are both huge WTFs! I'm trying to imagine what they could be using for an excuse. Nothing other than the fact that they aren't nice people. Could that really be it?

This is nonsensical... is every time some deranged mental patient imagine something about a character mean we have to change or erase it?

Most importantly though.. I'm not sure how you can do the OotP without Umbridge.. She is, not just her role but her character and personality, a HUGE and core aspect of that year/part of the story! I mean i already wasn't very excited about this, it doesn't need retelling, especially not in the current year.. But if they really are willing to do this, over the fantasies of some troon haters, likely just looking for ways to attack the media and author.. This shit is going to be a disaster. I expect the creators won't be able to resist the pressures from elites, media and business to insert troons and TRA talking points into it already. (turning female characters into male troons etc) I mean the racial retcons they are likely to make are going to be bad enough. Plus i'm half expecting Harry to be turned into "Harriet" or something retarded like that. No doubt a strong female character will spent most of the series solving the problems and saving the day either way..

Why is this being remade again? The movies, despite being what they are after CoS, are definitive.
 
Back
Top Bottom