- Joined
- Dec 14, 2022
Suck a dick ATF!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
View attachment 9403684View attachment 9403685View attachment 9403687
Goa announces intent to transfer a suppressor to 2 individuals tonight at 12:01 (one notably being B. Herrera ) without Registering it. Which would make it the first legal transfer of a suppressor without registering with the NFA since 1934.
They still have to follow the GCA, which I believe is just the standard background check?
My guess is the ATF will not appeal (IMO they would have already done so) but will lag issuing guidance causing a massive shit storm. (IE, do suppressors still need NFA engravings/Makers marks?)
This ruling creates so many questions, and I've already ordered 20 solvent traps from ping ping so hopefully everything plays out.
View attachment 9403707
Specifically Alaska, Georgia, Ohio, Washington, Oregon, explicitly requires NFA federal registration to possess NFA items.In theory, tonight at 12:01, any non-felon in the US can join the GoA and have half the NFA no longer apply to you. State laws still do apply and make the situation even more confusing.
Transfers between SOT still require paperwork AFAIK.How exactly does that transfer work since Brandon is a Manufacuring SOT, doesn't that mean he's already exempt from NFA paperwork?
From what I understand a SOT still has to file paperwork for a transfer of even a normal firearm due to being an FFL.Transfers between SOT still require paperwork AFAIK.
Bullpup RPK-74
I think the classic DOJ would have done it, I also think in the long run if they did it, it would be better for us in the long run, as we would probably get a favorable SC ruling...There are rumors of a veritable civil war going on in the DOJ over whether or not to appeal this decision,
They want ambiguity so they can find some technicality and go ahead and prosecute someone for it defying the ruling. They may not be as aggressive as they would be in a non-Trump administration but they're still not going to be happy about having to cede power. My guess is they'll look for the kind of people who immediately go for this and then see if they can find some technicality they violated and prosecute it, trying to create the impression that suppressors are still illegal/covered by NFA/regulated.My guess is the ATF will not appeal (IMO they would have already done so) but will lag issuing guidance causing a massive shit storm. (IE, do suppressors still need NFA engravings/Makers marks?)
With handguns its 100% about shot placement. Jacob Blake took 7 rounds of 9mm at a distance of under 6 feet and lived.A 225gr .45 cal ballistic tip expanding hollow point running at over 1,000fps will work better than 9mm.
This seems to be creating a magic window in time where unregistered suppressors will be legal. That means every illegal silencer in existence will have been purchased or produced in this magic window of time. Good luck proving otherwise.I called a bunch of local gun stores around me and absolutely none of them have any clue or information to provide about the injunction. They either have no clue what’s going to happen, or they want to wait until it takes effect tonight to give out information. This is going to be a complete shitshow
Even if it becomes legal to purchase suppressors without NFA registration under this ruling taking effect, there is no point if none of the FFL’s near you would be willing to do the transfer
Frankly, the very concept of a registered suppressor should be what's illegal.This seems to be creating a magic window in time where unregistered suppressors will be legal. That means every illegal silencer in existence will have been purchased or produced in this magic window of time. Good luck proving otherwise.
GOA's web site is barely hanging on right now![]()
This bill, the Mississippi Suppressor Freedom Act, enacts several key provisions. It defines a "firearm suppressor" as a device designed to muffle the report of a firearm, and states that a suppressor manufactured entirely within Mississippi is not subject to federal regulation under the authority of Congress to regulate interstate commerce. The bill requires such suppressors to be marked "Made in Mississippi" and allows a Mississippi resident to seek a declaratory judgment that the act is consistent with the U.S. Constitution. Importantly, it prohibits state or local governments from enforcing any federal law or regulation that imposes restrictions on suppressors beyond what exists under Mississippi law, and provides a remedy for violations through a mandamus action. The bill also repeals a state law that criminalized the manufacture of suppressors without federal authorization.
The best place to keep watch would probably be the GOA X Feed, because they almost certainly have an intern constantly hitting F5 on a virtual docket or caselog thingy to see if DOJ files an appeal/responseit's 6 PM EST, was there a challenge filed? I'm am retard, so I have no idea where to even check.