MASSIVE Erection Thread 2016 - Lizard has the advantage. Trump is spiraling towards defeat.

  • Thread starter Thread starter JU 199
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
First title
NEtitle.png


second title
title2.png


third title
US 2016 Presidential election  Trump victory leaves rivals distressed and confused    Kiwi Farms.png


Fourth title
trumptitle4.png


Fifth and Sixth title
new title (1).png


Seventh title
Screenshot_2016-06-07-12-33-22.png


eighth title
Apocalypse 2016.png


Ninth title
Screenshot_2016-07-25-23-47-41~2.jpg


tenth title
title10.png


All discussion of the candidates, updates and results should go here

For example- here's a video of Ted Cruz vying for world domination.


Also Hilary Clinton is a crook and nobody should have sex with her.

Discuss

(Note- The title will change as we get nearer the election, previous titles will be archived in the OP)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What can we realistically expect from a trump or Clinton presidency? I see them both getting anything hardly done as congress stone walls them both, especially if the GOP keeps its seats
My magic 8 ball says Trump gets stonewalled by both parties, Clinton gets stonewalled by GOPs and gets cruise control from Dems.
 
My magic 8 ball says Trump gets stonewalled by both parties, Clinton gets stonewalled by GOPs and gets cruise control from Dems.
Clinton always does the opposite. Whenever the GOP stonewalls, they steal their ideas, attack them from the right, then sign the fuck away. Hillary's have no problem whatsoever aside from the nation's collective disgust.

Trump'll likely do the same. He'll attack the GOP legislators from the right on "Law and Order," middle class tax cuts and immigration. Then he'll attack the Democrats from the left on Social Security, Medicare, Medicare, military intervention, and abortion. He'll attack both simultaneously on Israel/Palestine, NATO, free trade, and deteriorating relationships with the likes of Putin. Then he'll cozy up to both on lining pockets and taking the country to the cleaners.

Nicky Scarfo will get his own plot in Arlington cemetery.
 
Clinton always does the opposite. Whenever the GOP stonewalls, they steal their ideas, attack them from the right, then sign the fuck away. Hillary's have no problem whatsoever aside from the nation's collective disgust.

Trump'll likely do the same. He'll attack the GOP legislators from the right on "Law and Order," middle class tax cuts and immigration. Then he'll attack the Democrats from the left on Social Security, Medicare, Medicare, military intervention, and abortion. He'll attack both simultaneously on Israel/Palestine, NATO, free trade, and deteriorating relationships with the likes of Putin. Then he'll cozy up to both on lining pockets and taking the country to the cleaners.

Nicky Scarfo will get his own plot in Arlington cemetery.

Attacking the dems from both flanks is brilliant and no republican would ever try it except Trump. It could work as well since he got more votes in Ohio than Clinton did.
 
Kasich may very well end up being off the ballot in the state of Pennsylvania, it turns out.
BillLawrenceOnline said:
Kasich Pennsylvania Plan Has Flaw — After Gov. John Kasich’s stirring primary win last night (March 15) in his home state of Ohio, he said“Tomorrow I’m going to Philadelphia and then I’m going all over the country!”

Great plan and all as Pennsylvania has a similar demographic to The Buckeye State except there is a problem. Of the signatures on the petitions that Kasich submitted to get on the ballot here, 802 of them are said to be invalid. This is a big problem as 2,000 signature are needed and Kasich submitted but 2,184.

A Rubio supporter is the one making the challenge. Leaving aside that Rubio has suspended his campaign and that the complainant now might wish he could take it back, we suspect that there is a very good chance that the signatures are bad as per state law.

Pennsylvania has what might be the nation’s most obscenely technical ballot access laws.

Most feel that it should be the spirit of the law rather than the letter that applies when it comes to ballot access. Judges in Pennsylvania, however, most definitely disagree.

In 2015, the Democrat candidates for Delaware County Council were kicked off the ballot due to a minor filing error. The precedent was set in May 2014 when the state Supreme Court overturned a lower court and said that retiree Bob Guzzardi could not be on the Republican gubernatorial primary ballot because the papers were not filed in the proper sequence with the proper kommisars.

The access laws should obviously be changed but this is a serious ethical pickle. It is very wrong to leave Kasich off the ballot, unless it should be that the offense is egregious such as the signatures being forged. It is worse, however, to grant him an exception from laws that had hitherto been strictly enforced.

The Pennsylvania primary is April 26 and Kasich’s lawyers are fighting hard right now to get him on the ballot.
http://billlawrenceonline.com/kasich-pennsylvania-plan-flaw/
 
A large part of Bernie's lack of popularity among black voters is his failure to win over the traditional political gatekeepers of the African-American community - ministers, black local government leaders, owners of small businesses that cater to mostly black communities, etc etc. These are the people who don't just inform black communities about politics, they actively encourage them and even assist them to go out and vote.

Black people are, sadly, more likely to be low information voters. This doesn't mean they're stupid or unaware of their interests. It just means that it's often hard for them to access information about politics because many of them lack steady internet access and/or the leisure time to do lots of the kind of amateur political research that people here do. It's another aspect of poverty, essentially - information poverty.

The Clintons have done a lot of work, starting in the late 80s, in building up relationships with these black gatekeepers. And it's work that is still paying off. It wasn't enough when facing a black candidate, but it seems to be working against other white candidates.
 
I'm also puzzled by Sanders lack of appeal to black folks. The dude marched with MLKjr and got arrested protesting in Selma. He was hardly a major figure in civil rights, just a young foot soldier, but he was still actually in it.

Meanwhile Billary presided over the biggest expansion in the police state to date and turned huge profits sending black people to prison in record numbers.
 
Ted Cruz has won the endorsement of Lindsey Graham.

Here are some things Graham has previously said about his fellow US Senator and former competitor for the Republican presidential nomination.

“If you killed Ted Cruz on the floor of the Senate, and the trial was in the Senate, nobody would convict you.”

"If you're a Republican and your choice is Donald Trump and Ted Cruz in a general election, it's the difference between poisoned or shot -- you're still dead."
 
Well that'll sway things. Compared to Graham, the elusive Jeb Bush endorsement is political viagra.

I'd say that while Graham's endorsement won't help Cruz on its own, it could be an indication that the establishment is starting to coalesce around Cruz as an "anything but Trump" choice. If this is followed by Cruz winning more endorsement from establishment figures it might give him some boost. He's still in a rough position though and currently needs 80% of the remaining delegates in order to clinch the nomination. His best option is to win just enough to prevent Trump from clinching the nomination and then try to his chance at a contested convention. It's more likely of course that Trump will win.
 
I'd say that while Graham's endorsement won't help Cruz on its own, it could be an indication that the establishment is starting to coalesce around Cruz as an "anything but Trump" choice.

That makes sense. Seriously, though, nobody in the world gives a shit what Lindsey Graham thinks about anything on its own merits, though.
 
Looking at the bigger picture here, this campaign has become a bit fatiguing. Either Cruz or Trump will be the republican candidate, and they're both radical in different ways. That is unless the GOP chooses an establishment candidate, which would be insane and undemocratic.

On the other side of the coin, Sanders is also a radical, but it doesn't look like he's going to win the nomination, which will be a large loss of morale for the democratic side. And people mistrust Hilary as much as Trump.

A two-party system seems so futile in this kind of situation. I'm not looking for a pipe dream at this point, just a sane centrist that would keep up status quo and not cause riots *sigh*
 
I'd say that while Graham's endorsement won't help Cruz on its own, it could be an indication that the establishment is starting to coalesce around Cruz as an "anything but Trump" choice

That's true, but only because it's become clear that Cruz is literally the only person with a chance of beating Trump - and as you say, it's an incredibly slim chance. And even then I think the establishment may not coalesce - there are probably some people among the GOP's grandees who would prefer Trump to Cruz, or see them as bad as one another.

But I think it's too late anyway - as you say, Cruz would need to absolutely kill it from here on in. There was a window where a stop-Trump ticket could have worked, but it's closed now.
 
On the other side of the coin, Sanders is also a radical, but it doesn't look like he's going to win the nomination, which will be a large loss of morale for the democratic side. And people mistrust Hilary as much as Trump.
If people mistrusted Trump as much as Hillary, his campaign would've died in September.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom