- Joined
- Sep 8, 2021
I think at this point the volcano is hungry for human sacrifice.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Doubtful then that volcano might accepts lousy people Michael Moore, Al Sharpton, Barbra Streisand or Senn Penn as human sacrifice, they would give them some digestive disorders, lol.I think at this point the volcano is hungry for human sacrifice.
Lava is hotter than fire. More instant evaporation when chucking old nappies in to 3000 degree molten rock.What's the difference from just burning the trash? Nothing.
On to, I think. I doubt they'd sink.Lava is hotter than fire. More instant evaporation when chucking old nappies in to 3000 degree molten rock.
Yeah, but you still get the same result - toxic gas. Soot. Smoke.Lava is hotter than fire. More instant evaporation when chucking old nappies in to 3000 degree molten rock.
You find me a trucker who will drive to La Palma.Yeah, but you still get the same result - toxic gas. Soot. Smoke.
I mean, not being harsh but it's cheaper just to the the trash and throw some gasoline on it then trucking it all the way to a volcano. It is just as filthy.
Doubtful then that volcano might accepts lousy people Michael Moore, Al Sharpton, Barbra Streisand or Senn Penn as human sacrifice, they would give them some digestive disorders, lol.
Basically, you want a holocoaster for trash. I can see the appeal.Anyone can just burn trash but to yeet garbage into an active volcano? THAT would be an epic experience.
If the volcano is still hungry after we toss a few celebrities into it we can just try tossing more in until the eruption ends or until we're all dead.It's not a sacrifice if you're offering people you want gone.
Trust me, Justin Bibbles and Miley Cyrus are both on my short list, but a sacrifice involves giving up something you DON'T want to lose.
The heat incinerates stuff quicker. It's different than it burning.Yeah, but you still get the same result - toxic gas. Soot. Smoke.
I mean, not being harsh but it's cheaper just to the the trash and throw some gasoline on it then trucking it all the way to a volcano. It is just as filthy.
Let's toss some celebrities who are wide load like Rob Reiner and Lena Dunham and let's wait and see how the volcano will react.If the volcano is still hungry after we toss a few celebrities into it we can just try tossing more in until the eruption ends or until we're all dead.
You just want the promised megatsunami.Let's toss some celebrities who are wide load like Rob Reiner and Lena Dunham and let's wait and see how the volcano will react.
Either way a volcano being used to dump trash will just vaporize and be even more toxic that just regular burning. Vaporizing plastics etc. in high heat is far worse for the environment than a hole in the ground - or even regular burning.The heat incinerates stuff quicker. It's different than it burning.
If you burn stuff in a pile, you have ash left over. Throw it all in a volcano and it tidies up after itself. all the crap, plastic, left-overs get swept away in a river of lava and turned in to rock, or at least become part of it. Much better than chucking it in a big hole and throwing mud on top.
I think so.Is that a vent opening way down the hill?
Holy shit, that is gloriousIt's been going apeshit tonight.
View attachment 2632807