God, what I wouldn't give for a
Denko-esque 2ch thread on Sweet.
I think most people who went to college had more fun than Sweet because they probably weren't surrounded by people who felt nothing for them but resentment and disgust.
Artist here, and somebody with some (very minor) spacial awareness difficulties. Jonathan Sweet's art seems to indicate he has poor spatial awareness skills, at least as far as I'm concerned. On top of very obviously having never had any formal art training, Sweet's art suffers from
horror vacui. He may be able to line up facial features on a face so that it looks recognizable, but his sense of composition is poor. He is unable to make comic panels that allow the eye to travel through them with ease; every fucking page is like a "Where's Waldo" page, except in Where's Waldo, the entire thing being chaotic is done on purpose. I think Sweet has taken a lot from the pages of comic artists like Basil Wolverton and R. Crumb, without any understanding of what made their styles work. The 90's also had a bumper crop of comics (usually edgy independent titles, natch) that had very busy, chaotic panels, and I would bet that Sweets read a few.
There is no flow in Sweets' work. There is no sense of unity. The man barely has a consistent style aside from "hideously ugly." He certainly doesn't have any command of color theory. His art never evolved beyond what a middle schooler might doodle while taking notes. How in the hell he expects anybody to buy his garbage is beyond me.
I mean, I really feel like this thread needs more ripping into why his art sucks so bad. There's a lot of analysis on why his writing sucks.
Remind me to do that later.