"most common plot"? It's one of the most common jokes. He is always trying to grope Ranma or the other girls. He's even worse in the mangas.
Again, people always act like Happosai dominates when he really doesn't. I've read all the manga and he's only in like one-fifth of it... even then, most of his appearances are tertiary. It's more common for his past misdeeds to be responsible for something happening now (like the arc where the guy wants a name change and thanks to tribal religion only Happosai can do it) than for him to be groping girls.
Read the post. In the Slayers novel when Lina is captured by the henchmen in the first series they debate who is going to rape her. The joke is the fishman is going to rape her but she isn't able to lay eggs so he can't fertilize them. The TV series turns the rape joke into being kissed and censors the original novel like I said. I read the novels, I watched the series. I know more than you do.
No you don't.
They don't "debate who is going to rape her" they're trying to get her to tell them where the statue is, she refuses, so they threaten her with rape by fish dude to scare her. She still doesn't care so they order him to do it... then the joke of "oh, right, fish reproduce by inseminating eggs" plays out.
This is honestly a joke I think is made funnier by the Tokyopop translation, where they change "rape" to "kiss" like in the anime, but Noonsa still wants her to produce eggs. Then it adds a line by Zelgadis saying "I think something was lost in translation."
Also I find it funny that you're trying to dismiss me as a "weeb that makes anime look bad" when I posted like three long posts talking about how I stopped liking anime.
I meant more like "trannies are weak-willed, porn-addicted manchildren, so if they can turn on something they really like and formed their identity around for not aligning with their values, I should be able do the same thing."
The problem is, they can do it because they're literal ideological robots, probably don't even have souls. Of course when your every thought and feeling is delivered on a punch card, you'll be able to easily turn on anything.
It's ultimately a good thing that your heart has things you just can't reject. That's what makes you human.
Deny it all you like, but see if you can rebut this without resorting to false equivalence, no true scotsman, or ad hominem.
Why bother? I think Biglurker already handled this one.
Also in general, it seems like it's always the worst kind of anime that gets super popular and defines what future anime will do in Japan. Dragon Ball turned shonen manga from poorly-written but inoffensive comics (i.e. Kinnikuman, Saint Seiya) into borderline ecchi and introduced all the cringe tropes (forever fights, fourth-wall-breaking characters that completely invalidate weebs' argument of "muh MCU quips", and just really bad writing) that define shonen.
Honestly dude... Kinnikuman probably helped pave the way for Dragon Ball, and from what I read Kinnikuman is even more gross.
I do agree that Shonen crap has a tendency to become way too visible. I recall when Shonen Jump started publishing in the US, I read it for awhile but eventually was overtaken by a feeling of "all these manga feel exactly the same."
Also agree that fandoms tend to highlight the worst. This is why I have trouble trusting online opinions (even here) because most people will be fine with slop--I'm sure there's people who unironically enjoy Rings of Power (meaning the Amazon show.. I never hear people go to bat for the unrelated Sega Genesis game). Heck I'm old enough to remember when reviewers all said Earthbound was
bad.
A big problem with most opinions is too many are the result of either conformity, contrarianism, or some bizarre emotional hangup.
I wouldn't be surprised if Ranma paved the way for tranime/futanari since I've seen lots of trannies credit their "egg cracking" to Ranma and similar genderbender anime.
See, this is why I said Ranma is tough to recommend now.
Nobody in the 1990s watched Ranma and saw it as trans advocacy. Most saw it as just a show with a funny premise. We actually had a topic about Ranma around the time the Netflix reboot was announced and even then we saw examples split down the middle where some woketoids derided Ranma as offensive for reinforcing classical values while others were trying to recast it as being actually totally a proto-trans show.
My own thought is that seeing Ranma as a tranny show is like thinking Popeye is pro-steroid abuse because he gets stronger after eating green stuff he claims is spinach.
80s is full of dark fantasy animation. From Wizards to Lord of the rings, there is a huge gambit of 80's dark fantasy animated movies.
And ALL of them are worth watching. The sadness kicks in once you watch all the animated 70s-80s movies and then need something new. I mean I don't mind watching Watership Down or The Last Unicorn again, but I've seen them so often I can quote them from memory.
And then for some people there's the weird biases. I could tell most people that Bravestarr: the Legend is a really good movie but most will think its a toy tie-in (it actually isn't--the show's concept was helmed by one of Filmation's writers) and then give it a pass.
Maybe revisionist history is starting to make its way into the anime sphere by hood weebs but no Anime was not mainstream.
I was fucking
there, dude. It was.
Anime has been mainstream since Disney actually
Anime means cartoon, therefore Mickey Mouse is anime
I've always had issues with this argument. It's in essence true but its true in the same way "Tetris is a role-playing game because you're playing the role of the person who guides the blocks" is true.
I said this elsewhere: I hate when I'm looking at lists of "lesser known cartoons of the eighties/nineties" and then they end up mostly listing anime, because they're just not equivalent experiences, the same way that a Fantasy novel and a Science Fiction novel are not equivalent.