Debate Death Penalty

[Happy Fish]

You're acting like you're giving a sermon on the Mount

That is the part I am referring to. If you can't parse me returning fire at shit talk from anger that isn't something I'm worried about.

 

[John.Doe]

retty sure the furry lost the argument when he started wishing death on a someone having a philosophical debate with him on the internet.

I just stated the obvious - that the world would be better off without you, if for no other reason than your advocacy that subhuman filth be rewarded for murdering citizens with a lifetime of taxpayer funded living. I never wished that you would die, or called for your death. Why are you so defensive - are you perhaps subconsciously aware this is the truth and redirecting your self disgust outward?

Try not to let your anger get the better of you, I wouldn't want you to break into someone's home and stab them 43 times.

 

[Happy Fish]

I just stated the obvious - that the world would be better off without you, if for no other reason than your advocacy that subhuman filth be rewarded for murdering citizens with a lifetime of taxpayer funded living. I never wished that you would die, or called for your death. Why are you so defensive - are you perhaps subconsciously aware this is the truth and redirecting your self disgust outward?

Try not to let your anger get the better of you, I wouldn't want you to break into someone's home and stab them 43 times.

Yeah you said the world would be better off without me in Minecraft. It isn't like you ACTUALLY want something to happen to me while you are so mad at the internet that taxpayer money goes to necessary government institutions as opposed to the much larger wastes like foriegn interests.

Furries are always so dramatic. Try not to break into someone's house and fuck their dog 43 times.

Edit: Alright, I've had enough for now and am leaving this thread. If you want to have a blood orgy over this guy's corpse with self-righteous vigor be my guest. Hopefully at least someone here appreciates humanism toward the undeserving. Later fags.

 

[John.Doe]

as opposed to the much larger wastes like foriegn interests.

You need to lurk more, if you think I am in favor of spending tax money on foreign interests. Are you real, or just some kind of advanced chat bot? You're certainly reacting like a true NPC with these dated references and truly bizarre non-sequitur responses.

Don't you have some fellow filth to laud, so you can pretend you're a moral person worthy of a high-trust society?

 

[The best and greatest]

Edit: Alright, I've had enough for now and am leaving this thread. If you want to have a blood orgy over this guy's corpse with self-righteous vigor be my guest. Hopefully at least someone here appreciates humanism toward the undeserving. Later fags.

I know its hard for you to understand what I'm about to say because you lack empathy in the sense that you are incapable of conceptualizing a perspective outside of your own, but not everyone subscribes to a dualistic moral framework. Killing is in fact neither good nor bad, it simply is.

 

[Frederica Bernkastel]

I figured Happy Fish is just trolling, but to add, Willams wasn't a model inmate either. It was documented Willams fought people in prison, and being in prison doesn't stop you from being a threat either. Its well documented some of the most dangerous criminal enterprises operate out of prison and killing people in and from prison happens all the time.
Seeing how Willams even had the tenacity to attack prison guards... I don't see why keeping him alive along enough to possibly kill another productive member of society would be worth it.

I disagree with Happy Fish profusely, but I don't think it was necessary to insult or dog pile him. He was at least a devil's advocate.

I know its hard for you to understand what I'm about to say because you lack empathy in the sense that you are incapable of conceptualizing a perspective outside of your own, but not everyone subscribes to a dualistic moral framework. Killing is in fact neither good nor bad, it simply is.

Radical empathy and radical tolerance will be the death of society. Its better to have empathy for people who actually deserve it, like the people suffering from Hurricane Helena right now, then to tolerate a man who was a lost cause over 20 years ago.

 

[The best and greatest]

He was at least a devil's advocate.

He was a pretty shit one tbh. All he did was galvanize the thread against him, which isn't generally a good sign of being an effective devil's advocate. The reason he failed relates to the post you responded to with this:

Radical empathy and radical tolerance will be the death of society. Its better to have empathy for people who actually deserve it, like the people suffering from Hurricane Helena right now, then to tolerate a man who was a lost cause over 20 years ago.

When I say he lacks empathy I don't mean that in the way leftists misuse the word. I mean he quite literally showcases an inability to conceive of perspectives other than his own, which circles back to my point about him having an ego problem.

People who cant put themselves in other people's shoes will never be good devil's advocates because their dogmatic non-compromising attitude paired with presumptuous holier-than-thou hubris makes finding common ground impossible. Tbh I could forgive all of it if his reasoning was at least beyond the level of an afterschool debate club.

I would suggest he read some Nietzsche and come back to the conversation when he evolves.

 

[TexasRanger]

I figured Happy Fish is just trolling, but to add, Willams wasn't a model inmate either. It was documented Willams fought people in prison, and being in prison doesn't stop you from being a threat either. Its well documented some of the most dangerous criminal enterprises operate out of prison and killing people in and from prison happens all the time.
Seeing how Willams even had the tenacity to attack prison guards... I don't see why keeping him alive along enough to possibly kill another productive member of society would be worth it.

I disagree with Happy Fish profusely, but I don't think it was necessary to insult or dog pile him. He was at least a devil's advocate.



Radical empathy and radical tolerance will be the death of society. Its better to have empathy for people who actually deserve it, like the people suffering from Hurricane Helena right now, then to tolerate a man who was a lost cause over 20 years ago.

Ever been to Norway? I have, as well as to Finland and Denmark.

Pretty much alive these societies, with little to none no go areas. How come?

 

[TexasRanger]

He was a pretty shit one tbh. All he did was galvanize the thread against him, which isn't generally a good sign of being an effective devil's advocate. The reason he failed relates to the post you responded to with this:

When I say he lacks empathy I don't mean that in the way leftists misuse the word. I mean he quite literally showcases an inability to conceive of perspectives other than his own, which circles back to my point about him having an ego problem.

People who cant put themselves in other people's shoes will never be good devil's advocates because their dogmatic non-compromising attitude paired with presumptuous holier-than-thou hubris makes finding common ground impossible. Tbh I could forgive all of it if his reasoning was at least beyond the level of an afterschool debate club.

I would suggest he read some Nietzsche and come back to the conversation when he evolves.

Nietzsche was against capital punishment. He saw it as a part of the "morality of slaves" and had disdain for a state ruling through fear and violence.

I would suggest you read some Nietzsche yourself before you suggest that to others.

 

[The best and greatest]

Nietzsche was against capital punishment. He saw it as a part of the "morality of slaves" and had disdain for a state ruling through fear and violence.

I would suggest you read some Nietzsche yourself before you suggest that to others.

Couple things:
1. Whether or not Nietzsche was himself for or against capital punishment is beside my point entirely
2. Combine your posts. You've been here for almost three years now you should know how this goes.

 

[cybertoaster]

a discussion about crime statistics which I now think back on and cringe

Yeah because "redpilling" is cringe, as cringe as the fat kid at school arguing endlessly about how Nintendo is better than Sega/Sony was. You don't redpill leftie normies, you out-lefty them. If someone mentions Kamala I call her Copmala and remind everybody how she jailed a bunch of black guys over minor shit because she had to fill a quota for political favors, how she didn't even say she was black and identified as an indian for most of her life because of internalized racism, or list all the awful corporations that back her. When I say that they got nothing on me, they can't say I'm pro BLUMPF because magas couldn't care less about those things Copmala did and will instead say dumb cringe shit they read on boomerbook about her sacrificing on the altar of moloch or some other nonsense. If they bring up Bernie I say all the shady shit he did so they can't accuse me of being a berniebro or a butthurt commie.

The secret is to make normies realize they're getting duped hard, not convince them to vote for El Trumpo.

 

[Vibe_Guy]

Fellas, ladies. Your arguments are all well and good. However, the death penalty debate was already resolved:

Verdict: It's balls to the wall AWESOME