- Joined
- Jan 31, 2018
At least with Black Panther the last two black superhero comic adaptations (Spawn, Blade) were all from 10+ years ago. We already very recently had a bunch of media fawning over Wonder Woman.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They'll need somebody charismatic to carry her if she only portrays somebodybored uninterested flatStoic, look how quickly Marvel heroes all became quippy, fun iron-man.
Why isn't this superhero in a padded jumpsuit like every other superhero?Topical. Not to imply Carol is one note and always like this but it's hard picturing Brie like this.
![]()
That was before the current sjw phaseWhy isn't this superhero in a padded jumpsuit like every other superhero?
You should've seen when they showed the trailer on Good Morning America. They tried tying it into the whole "We need more women in STEM" thing which feels a bit 2015-ish internet feminism and doesn't really have anything to do with the movie. Maybe you can tie the STEM thing to her being a former air force pilot or it featuring aliens but it's a serious stretch.It's pretty clear that Marvel wants this film to be a Wonder Woman killer, but I think it really falls short. Wonder Woman has the advantage of being a cultural icon that the public has a basic awareness of, but the general public doesn't even know who Carol Danvers is. This trailer does very little to explain who Carol is aside from being an amnesiac to crashed through the roof of a Blockbuster circa 1996. Compare to the Wonder Woman trailer that shows Diana as an inhabitant of a hidden civilization, who ventures into Patriarch's World after Steve Trevor's plane crashes on her island home. Upon hearing of the outbreak of World War I, she decides to end the bloodshed and cue action scenes. It doesn't give specific details, but the image of Wonder Woman stepping out onto No Man's Land SOLD me on seeing the film. Nothing of the sort happens in the Captain Marvel trailer. Hell, Samuel L. Jackson has more lines than Brie Larson, who has the personality of a toaster. All I could glean from her was that Carol loves to assault senior citizens on the train. It shows snippets of her past, but nothing to tie them together. If the final product is anything like the trailer, it's going to be a clusterfuck.
The worst part of it is that there are diehard MCU fans who will defend this garbage as one of Marvel's finest efforts. When most of the marketing focuses on the fact that the lead protagonist is a woman after the competition accomplished that two years prior, you know that ideology came before character and story. The Entertainment Weekly article claimed that Carol was funny, but flawed. Don't fucking TELL me. SHOW it in the trailer and Marvel couldn't even to that!
To be fair, I don't think Marvel are pushing the female thing particularly hard? I know that magazine had "the future is female" on it, but that's all?New At least with Black Panther the last two black superhero comic adaptations (Spawn, Blade) were all from 10+ years ago. We already very recently had a bunch of media fawning over Wonder Woman.
To be fair, I don't think Marvel are pushing the female thing particularly hard? I know that magazine had "the future is female" on it, but that's all?
Is the "most powerful hero EVAHH!" stuff coming from the MCU itself, or is that just fans/sites using the comics as a source?As I recall that was the case with Blank Panther as well. The media were all kicking up a fuss about it but Marvel didn't really overplay the "It's a BLACK GUY everyone!" At least not in the advertising. Fuck, the villain was essentially a member of BLM dialed up to max crazy.
Absolutely the MCU. Carol is nowhere near the strongest Marvel cape and is actually in the same ballpark as Spider-Man if we're going by her acomplishments. That's still impressive as Spidey is shown to temporarily lift a building or a commercial jet but that's far from being super impressive among their peers.Is the "most powerful hero EVAHH!" stuff coming from the MCU itself, or is that just fans/sites using the comics as a source?
I'd say it'd be a mistake for the MCU to include that in their universe and marketing, as a)no-one really cares if a superhero is the most powerful, we generally like them because they and their powers look cool, and we like their personality. I'm not gonna like Spidey and less 'coz Stark is more powerful, for instance.
I occasionally watch D&C, but not always - what I've seen of Car(o)l Manvers from him makes her sound unbearable.Absolutely the MCU. Carol is nowhere near the strongest Marvel cape and is actually in the same ballpark as Spider-Man if we're going by her acomplishments. That's still impressive as Spidey is shown to temporarily lift a building or a commercial jet but that's far from being super impressive among their peers.
The trick is she has the ability to absorb energy to boost her powers and her limits with it can jump her up to being Thor-strong but it's nowhere near the norm. Not like we have white holes just laying around. Still wouldn't be "the strongest ever".
Even the recent comics have more been overhyping her popularity as "Earth's Most Popular Superhero" than her being the strongest. Her popularity being questionable as her last notable act was punching Stark into a coma for disagreeing with her idea of jailing people for being potential criminals.
She's not lucky enough to be an alien. She's human and grew up in Boston. lol.I occasionally watch D&C, but not always - what I've seen of Car(o)l Manvers from him makes her sound unbearable.
But someone who's potentially as powerful as Thor when she drains power from other things but is generally on the high end of middling is okay I guess, especially as she seems (I think?) to be alien too.