Amber's finances - assumptions galore

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
escándalo said:
View attachment 1671926

So as predicted Amber's stats are depleting hard, I sense she is going to do like in January and post like 3 videos in November. She did this in January after her posting a lot in December its because she runs out of shit to do. Bare in mind October is the most profitable month in adsense optics so she is shooting herself in the foot. These are the lowest her monthly views have been in 2 years. That was expected completely its like DSP and the subs stuff it is artificially inflated by her constantly posting and making the number go up. I honestly do not think she will post for another week but at that point she is 1 week in of a new month rota of money, so at this point its like a circling the drain.

This of course is not considering her demonetisation because she actually has something has happened. I logged in on a different browser with edge no adblock and separate computer ran through 70 vids and got 4 starter ads in those - over the course of 3 years. I am in the UK but I had a US friend check and got similar results. NONE OF THESE VIDEOS HAD MID ROLLS and this was different from when I checked on friday just gone. In most videos she only had 1 banner ad on friday she had about 4.

Amber is lying about her monetisation absolutely and is probably in some denial now. We know something has happened because Chantel has been hammered by this too and I believe why this is why Chantal has been trying to get other sources of revenue too. This is interesting because I think her money earned is going to deplete massively now I think she is going to earn less than 2k now.
Click to expand...
Not only is this useful information, it's uncanny her SB info grade of B matches her flatso cup-size. Sorry..couldn't help mahself ;)

The demonetization situation type deal may only be part of her not filming. She may be trying to film actually "interesting" (for her) content to avoid further mushroom-stamping from YouTube.
 
Lesbian Sleepover said:
The demonetization situation type deal may only be part of her not filming. She may be trying to film actually "interesting" (for her) content to avoid further mushroom-stamping from YouTube.
Click to expand...
I have noticed that many more YTers have now Patreons as their incomes have been reduced from the effects of Covid on advertisements and now the changes in monetization at YouTube. Amber base expenses are at least $2,000 a month consisting of $1,600 for the flat, $200 for car expenses, $200 for mobile and internet. I assume that utilities are included. It could be that her income is getting close to this amount.

She may be looking at increasing her income by either:

1. Creating a Patreon as she may be looking more seriously at it.

2. Vlogging massive amounts of rubbish that she will be posting on a daily basis like the 100 days of vlogging.

3. Selling merchandising like other YTers.

4. Asking Becky to get a job.
 
Is no one following other youtube communities where the creators may be talking openly about what is going on with adsense behind the curtains at the moment?
Or is it somehow against TOS to talk about it?
The other communities I follow have always been on the beaten end of Youtube anyways and prone to unfair demonetization for their expressed views so I do not have any useful info on that.
I have tried looking at whether there are ads on AL's videos too with a non-adblock browser and I see ads. But I cannot spot the difference if there is one because I normally use adblock and for AL I watch the archive.
 
I guess there is one bright spot to 2020 with all this covid bullshit, in that it's knocked the fatties right off their feeding troughs and is forcing them into more honest (or at least harder) ways of earning money instead of just stuffing their chubby chops and posting video after banal video on absolutely nothing happening at all. What remains to be seen is if Hamberlynn can adapt to this new belt-tightening era of survival of the fattest. One way or another it's going to be entertaining (just not for her!)
 
So Karina raised a good point regarding Amber getting a strike and the more that I keep thinking about it the more a strike and the new ad policies / guidelines coming in just seems coincidental.

Amber for a month or so has been putting titles in that are not relevant to the content and Youtube actually gets pissed at it. Her next couple of plays are going to be integral for her survival I think now. She clearly cannot coast.
 
SnarlieNarlie said:
Is no one following other youtube communities where the creators may be talking openly about what is going on with adsense behind the curtains at the moment?
Or is it somehow against TOS to talk about it?
The other communities I follow have always been on the beaten end of Youtube anyways and prone to unfair demonetization for their expressed views so I do not have any useful info on that.
I have tried looking at whether there are ads on AL's videos too with a non-adblock browser and I see ads. But I cannot spot the difference if there is one because I normally use adblock and for AL I watch the archive.
Click to expand...
She has gone from "monetization on" to "limited monetization" on nearly all her videos

You turned on monetization for this video, but because it doesn’t meet all our advertiser-friendly content guidelines, brands may choose to opt out on content. This generally means you may earn less revenue on this content (because fewer ads are likely to appear) compared to content that’s suitable for advertisers.

What the yellow icon means for you.​

  • If the status description says “causing limited or no ads. You can request a review”: That means our automated systems assessed this video. You can request a review, which means a person who specializes in content assessment will look at the video again, and if appropriate, can change the video’s monetization status.
  • If the status description says “currently causing limited or no ads, but video is under review”: That means a policy specialist (a real person, not a machine) is reviewing this video. Our specialists can keep or change the monetization status, and their decision is final.
  • If the status description says “currently causing limited or no ads. Confirmed by manual review”: That means our policy specialists have looked at the video, and believe that it doesn’t meet all of our advertiser-friendly content guidelines. The yellow icon status is locked and cannot be changed.



She used to have at least 6 video ads interrupting each uploaded video. Now it's just a few little banner ads during the videos.
 
Damn thanks D_Tractor I got that as you can see in my above post. She must be fucking reeling right now. Its got to be on almost every video I went back 4 years and got 2 banner ads tops and 10 full screen ads out of about 200 videos. She was lying her ass off about demonetisation and it explains why she has not uploaded because she is manually filing all nearly 2000 videos which would take ages. I looked over 10% and if we are just using numbers only 80 - 100 have front ads.

She should nuke all her content with kids in because she could get struck with that kind of content.
 
escándalo said:
Damn thanks D_Tractor I got that as you can see in my above post. She must be fucking reeling right now. Its got to be on almost every video I went back 4 years and got 2 banner ads tops and 10 full screen ads out of about 200 videos. She was lying her ass off about demonetisation and it explains why she has not uploaded because she is manually filing all nearly 2000 videos which would take ages. I looked over 10% and if we are just using numbers only 80 - 100 have front ads.

She should nuke all her content with kids in because she could get struck with that kind of content.
Click to expand...
Don't give her ideas. I love the idea of Amber being stressed and actually have to do some work to try and get her income back.
 
escándalo said:
Damn thanks D_Tractor I got that as you can see in my above post. She must be fucking reeling right now. Its got to be on almost every video I went back 4 years and got 2 banner ads tops and 10 full screen ads out of about 200 videos. She was lying her ass off about demonetisation and it explains why she has not uploaded because she is manually filing all nearly 2000 videos which would take ages. I looked over 10% and if we are just using numbers only 80 - 100 have front ads.

She should nuke all her content with kids in because she could get struck with that kind of content.
Click to expand...
This is very interesting. No wonder her mental status is going downhill. She probably realizes that she needs to do something. We have to realize that Amber is a survivor and will do anything to maintain her income.
 
Last edited:
People who have GOOD patreons actually have great content (yeah duh we know)

Look at any Gun youtuber, some 3D printer and or my favorite, the vintage video game types.
 
wilderbeans said:
Are they allowing evictions in Kentucky with Covid?
Click to expand...
Yes and no.
On Friday, Gov. Beshear, who has taken repeated steps to keep people from being evicted at the height of the pandemic, updated the state’s executive order on evictions to reflect the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s moratorium on residential evictions through Dec. 31.

Under the CDC order, a tenant who signs and submits a declaration to his or her landlord about the inability to timely pay rent cannot be evicted. However, the declaration is required in order to prevent an eviction. Like the Governor’s prior executive orders on evictions, the CDC order does not relieve anyone of the obligation to pay rent or comply with any other obligation under a tenancy, lease or similar contract. The CDC order allows landlords to charge and collect fees, penalties and interest for failure to timely pay rent, but prohibits evictions for nonpayment or late payment of such fees, penalties or interest.
Click to expand...
If I'm reading this correctly, they cannot evict you if you submit a declaration to your landlord stating that you cannot pay, up through December 31st. So yes, you could be evicted if you just don't pay and don't bother to make the declaration to your landlord, but since that is a very easy hurdle to clear, I think Amber will be fine until the end of the year.

If Amber decides to just claim she can't pay, she will still eventually end up owing the full amount, which I assume she would be sued for at a later date unless she is able to pay it before it gets to that point.
 
SnarlieNarlie said:
Is no one following other youtube communities where the creators may be talking openly about what is going on with adsense behind the curtains at the moment?
Or is it somehow against TOS to talk about it?
The other communities I follow have always been on the beaten end of Youtube anyways and prone to unfair demonetization for their expressed views so I do not have any useful info on that.
I have tried looking at whether there are ads on AL's videos too with a non-adblock browser and I see ads. But I cannot spot the difference if there is one because I normally use adblock and for AL I watch the archive.
Click to expand...

My boyfriend follows gaming channels and I’ve heard a couple of them mention that their income has gone down since March. The thing is, I don’t think anyone he watches does YT or internet stuff as their only source of income, so they’re just trying to keep up with their own channel and maybe have some extra cash. He says that from what he knows, almost all of them have a day job or business outside of YT. They’re not exactly panicking and talking about it as if it’s the end of the world. But he did just tell me nearly everyone he watches has started their Patreon within the last 6 months...

I think we will see the effect of a decrease in monetization for people like Amber and Chantal because they have nothing else, but it won’t be obvious until they blow through their savings. Amber has to be getting close considering she has been spending $2-4k a week on junk, plus that bed.

The ad thing is confusing because I noticed a while ago that if I went back to a video more than once, I didn’t get ads every time. I said in another thread that I think people are noticing now because everyone was going back to her latest upload to read comments. People don’t normally go back to any given video 20-30 times in a week lol but they were last week. YouTube isn’t going to pay out for 10 ads every time someone watches a video, that would be easy to manipulate. I’m sure it has something to do with the IP address of the person watching the videos as well, so people don’t gouge the system and spam views.

I don’t think channels like Amber are specifically being targeted though. I think this has been going on for awhile and like I said, it’s starting to catch up with her now because she’s terrible with money. I wouldn’t be surprised if she doesn’t even know how much she makes, let alone how much she spends.
 
Just thinking here but with her recent disappearance, I believe that she has gotten two guideline strikes because YouTube updated their terms of service. One strike, maybe, because she abuses the YouTube adsense by having 5-7 ads on a 15-20 minute video and the other strike because she has displaced her eating disorder. She doesn't post "mookbongs" anymore but that doesn't change the fact that she still revives money from videos that she's done a year ago.
mookbongs.JPG

I refuse to believe anything that Amber says, as the most of us do. So the "uwuwuwu. No, i did nowt get a guwidewine stwike. No, i’m nowt demonetized. No, it’s nowt abouwwt my cancew. No, i’m nowt going tuwwuw tawk abouwwt iwt thwouwgh sevewaw vwogs. No, i’m nowt going tuwwuw make iwt a “i juwwst don’t wanna tawk abouwwt it” situwation type deaw. No, i haven’t bewn juwwst binging own my couwch. No, becky awnd i haven’t bwoken uwp. Yes, i’m awive (sowwy). Juwwst stowp with the pointwess wuwmows, pwease. It’s uwsewess. Youww negativity iws onwy making me wawnt tuwwuw stay away even wongew. I’ww be bawck soon buwt i’m juwwst nowt suwwe whewn. Awnd i won’t be coming bawck fow the twowws, hatews, cwuwew peopwe, ow weaction channews. I’ww be coming bawck fow my suwppowtews awnd mysewf." is just another pity party for the Annbabies to eat up. The last time she posted a video was Oct/6/2020 and her second most recent community post was posted on Oct/17/2020. It was pointed out in the comments that it's super obvious that she got a guideline strike because she was silent for 7+ days, no posting for 7 days.
Again, this is just what I think could be happening. It also ties in with her finances because, of course, if you get demonetized that means you can't milk your shitty online behavior/eating disorder/addiction for money anymore. No more of that sweet sweet moolah. Take whatever I say with a grain of salt, these are just my thoughts.
tl;dr
money machine broke
 
Fascist Ferret said:
Probably not much tbh.... she is in denial about her fatness, so she wouldnt want to cater to feeder fetishists. She is not shameless like chantal. And then, only one person from the farms would pay up. A countable number of haydurs from other areas like reddit or facebook are both 1) obsessed enough to cough up money like that and 2) in possession of enough money.
Click to expand...
Yeah, the disgusting fatso who constantly shows her breast area and posted photos of blood from her rotten crotch is so ashamed of her situation.

Amber has no reason to go the feeder porn route right now. If it came to it, she would. She would not even have to venture into her southern hemisphere. She could sloppily eat for cash while making her orgasm sounds. You forget that being this fat is rare and that a small number of men get their peepees diamonds to this depravity.
 
idosometimes said:
Yeah, the disgusting fatso who constantly shows her breast area and posted photos of blood from her rotten crotch is so ashamed of her situation.

Amber has no reason to go the feeder porn route right now. If it came to it, she would. She would not even have to venture into her southern hemisphere. She could sloppily eat for cash while making her orgasm sounds. You forget that being this fat is rare and that a small number of men get their peepees diamonds to this depravity.
Click to expand...
She wouldn't make shit off feeder porn. Feeders want cute fat submissive girls, not ugly argumentative sociopathic cunts.
 
Gouto-Douji said:
Just thinking here but with her recent disappearance, I believe that she has gotten two guideline strikes because YouTube updated their terms of service. One strike, maybe, because she abuses the YouTube adsense by having 5-7 ads on a 15-20 minute video and the other strike because she has displaced her eating disorder. She doesn't post "mookbongs" anymore but that doesn't change the fact that she still revives money from videos that she's done a year ago.
View attachment 1673400
I refuse to believe anything that Amber says, as the most of us do. So the "uwuwuwu. No, i did nowt get a guwidewine stwike. No, i’m nowt demonetized. No, it’s nowt abouwwt my cancew. No, i’m nowt going tuwwuw tawk abouwwt iwt thwouwgh sevewaw vwogs. No, i’m nowt going tuwwuw make iwt a “i juwwst don’t wanna tawk abouwwt it” situwation type deaw. No, i haven’t bewn juwwst binging own my couwch. No, becky awnd i haven’t bwoken uwp. Yes, i’m awive (sowwy). Juwwst stowp with the pointwess wuwmows, pwease. It’s uwsewess. Youww negativity iws onwy making me wawnt tuwwuw stay away even wongew. I’ww be bawck soon buwt i’m juwwst nowt suwwe whewn. Awnd i won’t be coming bawck fow the twowws, hatews, cwuwew peopwe, ow weaction channews. I’ww be coming bawck fow my suwppowtews awnd mysewf." is just another pity party for the Annbabies to eat up. The last time she posted a video was Oct/6/2020 and her second most recent community post was posted on Oct/17/2020. It was pointed out in the comments that it's super obvious that she got a guideline strike because she was silent for 7+ days, no posting for 7 days.
Again, this is just what I think could be happening. It also ties in with her finances because, of course, if you get demonetized that means you can't milk your shitty online behavior/eating disorder/addiction for money anymore. No more of that sweet sweet moolah. Take whatever I say with a grain of salt, these are just my thoughts.
tl;dr
money machine broke
Click to expand...
I think fat people running afoul of the eating disorder glorification rule by doing mukbangs is a slippery slope. Not all obese people have binge eating disorders, some just have shit diets and dead metabolisms from lack of activity. I don't think becky is a binge eater, nor destiny or dana. They're just obese slobs. Yes, Amber and Chantal have admitted to having BED, but the definition of what classifies as a binge on camera is going to be hard to nail down. Thin and average people do mukbangs as well (sorry, that sounded like an ALR line), and though I'm not an expert on the mukbangs, it seems characterized by eating (or appearing to eat) massive quantities of food. The can't have one rule for normal sized people eating a ton, and another for obese people. I think it *might* raise a legal argument if they use the rationale that ALL obese people eating on camera are suffering from binge eating disorder. If someone is obese, they didn't get that way from eating reasonable quantities of food in a sitting, but that doesn't make it a binge.

It gets even more complicated if an obese person is a food reviewer (I don't know what that category is technically called), and they go to a state fair and hit up every food booth, including the butter-fried butter booth. That would be, collectively, a massive amount of food, and I would consider that seriously disordered eating, but it's not a binge or disordered eating in the clinical sense.

There's a good case for someone like Nikocado getting striked for glorifying disordered eating in his quest to gain extreme amounts of weight. Meanwhile, amber and chantal are just gross.

Amber is a compulsive spender, but nobody is going to classify her hauls as glorifying a shopping addiction, even though it is, because hauls are a normal category.

I don't know what's causing amber and chantal's monetization issues, but I doubt it's a fat person eating thing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom