Disaster 03/22 Attack at Parliament - Driving down the road in a truck of peace

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Last edited:
Why should calling them a "Muslim" gang take precedence over them being an "Asian" gang when both facts are objectively true about all of them? Being a Muslim doesn't tell me which nationality your from anymore than being an Asian does.
Uh, yes it does. In 2017 a Muslim killing a non-Muslim is very likely to be over a religious conflict. An Asian killing a non-Asian is very unlikely to be a race based attack. Don't be intentionally ignorant.
 
Uh, yes it does. In 2017 a Muslim killing a non-Muslim is very likely to be over a religious conflict. An Asian killing a non-Asian is very unlikely to be a race based attack. Don't be intentionally ignorant.

It's not intentional ignorance. Obviously any terrorist attack by anyone named "Masood" is likely to have been Islamic in nature. The rest of the post, to which that ancillary point is attached, is that the BBC's terminology is not reactive. Rather than this being pressure from some Muslim lobby (a conspiracy) its rooted in the archaic terminology imposed by the government in-which the Middle-East is part of Asia (archaic only from the perception by the public mind-you, the Middle-East is still very much part of Asia).
 
Last edited:
It's not intentional ignorance. Obviously any terrorist attack by anyone named "Masood" is likely to have been inspired by Islam. The rest of the post, to which that ancillary point is attached, is that the BBC's terminology is not reactive. Rather than this being pressure from some Muslim lobby (a conspiracy) its rooted in the archaic terminology imposed by the government in-which the Middle-East is part of Asia (archaic only from the perception by the public mind-you, the Middle-East is still very much part of Asia).

You have a very odd and specific fixation on terminology.
 
Rezzing the thread because the woman who jumped into the Thames during the attack has died.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...fell-thames-westminster-attack-dies-hospital/

It's actually really fucking sad - she was on a short trip with her boyfriend and he was planning to propose to her.
Happiness is an insult to Allah. Slaughter the infadels so that they can know the love and peace of the brothel full of children that a good Muslim receives in the afterlife, a heaven filled with endless child raping! Allah is purity, peace and love! And if you don't believe me, I'll fucking kill you.
 
Rezzing the thread because the woman who jumped into the Thames during the attack has died.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...fell-thames-westminster-attack-dies-hospital/

It's actually really fucking sad - she was on a short trip with her boyfriend and he was planning to propose to her.
Aww, man, that's so sad. You obviously realize that it's bad when so-and-so many people die in an attack but little stories like that really make it hit closer to home. Every holiday, every birthday, every family event - one person is going to be missing just because some fucking cunt decided to go on a rampage that day....
 
Let's not overlook who the real victim is here!

NhrbOtt.png
When we had black slaves in the states, that was genuine racism and greed. In this scenario, he had the opportunity to integrate (not to mention being born there) and even received open arms. Surprise surprise, Islam gives him the impression that he's still living in a "sinful society" and that all those nice Westerners still "hate" him. So what does he do? Why play the game called 'Jihad' of course! He would kill people even if they beg him not to do away them. The story only concludes with a twist that he was just a "victim of racism" and that we need to "offer our most to them". The story repeats.
 
Back
Top Bottom