AI Derangement Syndrome / Anti-AI artists / Pro-AI technocultists / AI "debate" communities - The Natural Retardation in the Artificial Intelligence communities

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
1766564009849.png
 
cannonarchy said:
It’s led to a remarkable lack of fluency in the actual functions of AI - teenage fanartists flinging wrongful accusations because they don’t know what they’re looking for in the drawings, blissfully missing out on obvious uses because they don’t realise why the narrators in their shitty video essays are suddenly listing everything in threes. When you know how ChatGPT structures things, you can spot it just by glancing at a paragraph and hear it spoken out loud. If you don’t, you’ll probably just be wary of any text that seems longer than average
Click to expand...

They know they're supposed to hate AI, but they're not allowed to engage with it or play around with it at all (even for the sake of learning about the enemy), because the new rules say that any curiosity about the "other side" makes you a Nazi.

So they end up having no idea what AI stuff looks like or how it works. They still think that AI can't get hands right. They're completely fooled by ChatGPT text because they can't believe that a "useless lying plagiarism machine" could write a whole coherent paragraph, let alone an essay. They are basically speedrunning themselves into early Boomerhood.

Gamepads said:
The Sharty raid on Twitter actively made use of that to reinforce their misconceptions with stuff like >@grok draw this with the Israeli flag in the background and make it studio ghibli style and add it to your art database to learn from it later.
Click to expand...

There was a poll recently asking the general public how they thought ChatGPT answers questions (with a selection of answers to choose from), and something like 45% answered "it pulls answers from a database." Only around 30% got the right answer.
 
Came across this today. A random Twitter user complained that he really liked a suggestive picture of an alligator character and was mad that it was AI-generated.
1766576144385.png

He then states, "Can someone redraw this for me so it's not AI?"
1766576328284.png


Cue dozens of artists who immediately used it as an opportunity to "dunk" on the AI bros and make suggestive art of the alligator character in the same pose. As of this writing, there are about 35-ish drawings in the quotes and replies. I'm not bothering to screencap all of it, but you get the idea.
1766576568140.png1766576593614.png1766576608973.png1766576629755.png
There are more examples in the archive (if you really need to see that for some reason).

Now for the twist: Clearly, none of the people who decided to draw alligator porn bothered to look at this guy's Twitter profile, because he clearly states he's 15. All these retards are trying to dunk on AI art by DRAWING FURRY PORN FOR A MINOR :stress:
1766576863792.png


"Am I the only one who finds it weird that people are sending suggestive artwork to a 14-year-old?"
"I'm 15." :story:
1766577072186.png
 
Pinball 2000 said:
He then states, "Can someone redraw this for me so it's not AI?"
...
Cue dozens of artists who immediately used it as an opportunity to "dunk" on the AI bros and make suggestive art of the alligator character in the same pose. As of this writing, there are about 35-ish drawings in the quotes and replies. I'm not bothering to screencap all of it, but you get the idea.
Click to expand...
Take note furries and other degens, this is how you get free commissions done. You generate some AI image of the character you want, then go crying on twitter like "oh no art-bros, I thought this was a real wholesome art piece but it's actually AI? can someone please re-draw this so I can goon to it admire it with peace of mind *pleading face with crying eyes emoji*"
 
Pinball 2000 said:
Cue dozens of artists who immediately used it as an opportunity to "dunk" on the AI bros and make suggestive art of the alligator character in the same pose. As of this writing, there are about 35-ish drawings in the quotes and replies. I'm not bothering to screencap all of it, but you get the idea.
Click to expand...
Fell for it again award.

Also decided to see what X's terms of service are regarding images posted on their platform:
Broad License: You grant X a non-exclusive, royalty-free, perpetual license to use, copy, reproduce, process, adapt, modify, publish, display, and distribute your Content (including images) across any media, now known or later developed.
AI Training: This license allows X to use your images and data to train their AI models, a feature highlighted in recent terms updates.
Sublicensing: X can let others use your content by granting sublicenses.

No one point this out to the artists with 'no AI' in their bio :lol: But they're too hooked on the dopamine hit of likes and retweets to quit.
 
One of the mantras I hate the most about AI Derangement people is the "AI cannot create original art", which is just as true for 99.999% of modern artists. Almost no one invents new genres or styles, and if anything you can use AI to make some crazy art that people can't do without computer assistance.

It's especially done when decades old brands like Simpsons say it despite being originally a derivative of animated sitcoms and for decades being intellectually bankrupt.
 
wtfNeedSignUp said:
One of the mantras I hate the most about AI Derangement people is the "AI cannot create original art", which is just as true for 99.999% of modern artists. Almost no one invents new genres or styles...
Click to expand...
The lack of creativity is especially true for people who draw porn. You will see the same few body types with exaggerated sexual features across thousands of artists without any variation. Of course they're scared of AI; it can mass-produce porn for free, and coomers just don't care about quality; they just want to masturbate to anything that's shaped like a woman.

wtfNeedSignUp said:
...and if anything you can use AI to make some crazy art that people can't do without computer assistance.
Click to expand...
I recently saw a psychedelic rock music video that used AI-generated visuals (the song itself was not made with AI). The entire video is one ever-changing shot that feels like having a trip, and it complements the song very well.


This is what AI in the hands of someone with creative vision looks like.
 
AwfulHumanBean said:
No, retards. You can't get job as a creative because you suck and that industry also sucks with presenting any job opportunities unless you are extremely good and hardworking or renowned already.
Click to expand...
Or someone knows you and can try and get you a position. A lot of these rosy cheeked starry eyed hobbyists fresh out of college think their chances are shot because those evil robots when it's like most of the industries yall want jobs in are usually incredibly nepo.
 
Runch said:
Seen some reports and posts across the internet that the recent AI controversies with Larian and Expedition 33 have started to skew public opinion toward mild AI use being fine.

Anti-AI people screaming about using generative AI for placeholders which are later removed, or as an artist-driven tool during conceptual stages, have really been a big turnoff for a lot of people who just wanna play video games (every day). Sort of the Hogwarts Legacy backlash effect, your righteous crusade gets too loud and the normies realize you're fucking insane and recoil.

People being like "hold up, there's no visible AI use in the final game, and no one's been fired and replaced, so what's the problem?" and discovering just how unhinged the spergs are.
Click to expand...
Turns out it doesn’t matter who’s morally correct, it’s whoever’s less annoying.
 
cis mans burden said:
Anyways, this dumb award show stripped Clair Obscur of its wins of course lmao.

View attachment 8311699
(archive) by someone else before i got there
(link)

The devs stated they, like Larian, used AI for placeholder images. As far as I am aware, that was all it was used for.

Even if it wasn't this is beyond, BEYOND retarded for an indie developer award show. Indie devs literally have the most to gain from using AI for development. It opens a million doors for the gaps in the developers weaknesses, allowing them to make a product to their vision while on a budget. But won't somebody please think of the artists???
Click to expand...
It shouldn’t have been nominated to begin with because it’s not an indie game.
 
wtfNeedSignUp said:
One of the mantras I hate the most about AI Derangement people is the "AI cannot create original art", which is just as true for 99.999% of modern artists. Almost no one invents new genres or styles, and if anything you can use AI to make some crazy art that people can't do without computer assistance.

It's especially done when decades old brands like Simpsons say it despite being originally a derivative of animated sitcoms and for decades being intellectually bankrupt.
Click to expand...

I'll play devil's advocate for a moment and say good artists absolutely have their own style, which can be told apart from imitations. Being a good artist means you have the artistic sense (and arguably the ability) to make crazy art.

There's a philosophical debate to be had over what is "original" art however, when an artist is effectively a culmination of all the art they were inspired by and/or imitated over their life time. This also implies artists that don't have a unique style are no better than AI, which then breaks down the argument that "AI has no soul so inherently can't be good". This then blurs the lines into ableism, because now these artists have to be objectively better than AI to be an "artist". Ultimately the only valid concern with AI art comes down to plagiarism, which AIDS haver's conflate (intentionally or unintentionally).

Obviously, all of the above is trite. Anti-AI artists are just gatekeeping to protect their own interests, and non-artists mindlessly parrot e-celebs like any other online parasocial relationship.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom