LawTube - Lawyers sperging at each other on YouTube

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
DumDum Did Nothing Wrong said:
Damn DUI Guy must have pulled some kind of bullshit. But for fuck's sake just say what it was and a lot of it will die out. This being vague shit serves no one.
Click to expand...
More like they're blowing smoke. If it was so egregious, they would say what it was and their viewers would likely agree with their decision to excommunicate him from their fag church. Since they don't, it's likely petty high school mean girl bullshit.
 
quickthrowaway said:
More like they're blowing smoke. If it was so egregious, they would say what it was and their viewers would likely agree with their decision to excommunicate him from their fag church. Since they don't, it's likely petty high school mean girl bullshit.
Click to expand...
Unless it has something to do with him taking a photo in courtroom during proceedings of Heard's Council's laptop. I still feel like that was far more egregious than the pog face.
 
CatgirlTyranid said:
Unless it has something to do with him taking a photo in courtroom during proceedings of Heard's Council's laptop. I still feel like that was far more egregious than the pog face.
Click to expand...
He didn't do that though. He mentioned on Twitter that he saw Heard's lawyers with their laptops in full view of the gallery and that there was an invoice for $25,000 which he personally saw.
 
Frankly, Runkle went so hard on saying not to talk about it that it almost seemed like he actually wanted people to dig into it and keep pressuring.
 
quickthrowaway said:
He didn't do that though. He mentioned on Twitter that he saw Heard's lawyers with their laptops in full view of the gallery and that there was an invoice for $25,000 which he personally saw.
Click to expand...
The stupidity of all this starting over a pog face has me so confused I'm making up facts to explain it away apparently.
 
So some viewership stats this morning:
LegalBytes 27k with Kurt, Hoeg, Nate and 3 other people
DUIGuy at 9.5k solo
Goodlawgic at 3.1k solo
TUG with 19k solo
Rekieta 52k with Branca and Vices

DUIguy has done a good job securing a viewing base. LegalBytes tactic of quantity over quality doesn't seem to be working when they have no trial going. Emily Baker hasn't started streaming yet but she has 9.1k waiting at 30 mins til.
 
I'm not a Robot said:
The (reupload) tag suggests it did not have any commentary. She's a flaggot either way. It's obvious the DMCA takedown is about protecting her brand, rather than any lost revenue as there isn't going to be any on a deleted video.

This looks like the kind of controversy a small channel can build an audience off of.

View attachment 3334930
Click to expand...
Indeed it does. Looks like you've gained 1k people since this post (including me).
 
Potatoherder said:
So some viewership stats this morning:
LegalBytes 27k with Kurt, Hoeg, Nate and 3 other people
DUIGuy at 9.5k solo
Goodlawgic at 3.1k solo
TUG with 19k solo
Rekieta 52k with Branca and Vices

DUIguy has done a good job securing a viewing base. LegalBytes tactic of quantity over quality doesn't seem to be working when they have no trial going. Emily Baker hasn't started streaming yet but she has 9.1k waiting at 30 mins til.
Click to expand...
Emily Baker solo with 110K blowing everyone else out of the water.

Edit: RIP Uncivil
 

Attachments

  • 1654027013661.png
    1654027013661.png
    218.2 KB · Views: 87
Last edited:
prolapsed_cranium said:
Law-tism also works
Click to expand...
Not bad good sir. I am partial to Law-tists.

Potatoherder said:
So some viewership stats this morning:
LegalBytes 27k with Kurt, Hoeg, Nate and 3 other people
DUIGuy at 9.5k solo
Goodlawgic at 3.1k solo
TUG with 19k solo
Rekieta 52k with Branca and Vices

DUIguy has done a good job securing a viewing base. LegalBytes tactic of quantity over quality doesn't seem to be working when they have no trial going. Emily Baker hasn't started streaming yet but she has 9.1k waiting at 30 mins til.
Click to expand...
Hoeg, Kurt and Nate. Yuck. What a horrible panel.

Rackets panel has been super cozy with Branca and company. Legal Mindset was on earlier too.
 
Potatoherder said:
It's less she has the right to do it and the fact she is doing it right now. It's not like she couldn't do this in a month when it cools off. Every time the flames look to be dying down she pours gas on them.


He was 'dating' this woman at some point:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=lEtx23ps9j0
There was a livestream in which she and him were on and she went full on protection mode when someone called Kurt gay. A breakup happened and he began to go full on proto-incel. He purged almost a million views in march so it may no longer exist.
View attachment 3335949
Click to expand...
I was wondering what was going up with that loki person on his streams and why she's no longer doing streams with Kurt anymore. That sounds like a sensible theory. I recall he once called her "babe" on those streams, which was odd because you wouldn't do that if said person is a guest, one time or reoccurring. Maybe that explains why Kurt looks pissed off in all the future streams.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom