- Joined
- Dec 17, 2023
When will you stop contributing to the demand of prostitution and sex trafficking? When will you stop cooming your life away? When will you start treating yourself with the respect you deserve?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Those goalposts sure moved fast. Why is this argument is only ever applicable to porn? Do you check with the wagie at McDonald's to make sure he has other options before you accept a burger from him? How about the Mexican guy that rotated your tires? What about the African kid that mined the lithium for your phone? If you need enthusiastic consent from every single person you accept services from in your life, you're going to run out of things you can do really, really fast.So you've never checked, then. Even when there is no trafficking involved, which we can never really know, who do you think are the people that end up doing porn? Healthy, mentally and emotionally stable people? People who are well off? Or people who do it because they think they have no other option? Most people who are in porn were sexually abused as children, and that's why their boundaries have been corroded to the point that they feel comfortable commodifying themselves.
What made you stop?I used to be a coomer. I merely want to encourge/help other coomers who are trapped in the addiction
I don't ever go to McDonald's, ew. But this comparison isn't even remotely fair. The wagie at McDonald's isn't doing something that's inherently dehumanizing and degrading. He's not committing career suicide. If he wants to work somewhere else afte McDonald's, he's capable of doing so, he doesn't have to worry about destroying his reputation. I think it's pretty obvious that doing porn and having a wagie job are worlds apart.Do you check with the wagie at McDonald's to make sure he has other options before you accept a burger from him?
Again, nothing inherently dehumanizing or degrading in changing someone's tires. Perfectly honest work that needs to be done. The African kid that mined the lithium, that's the first example that actually makes sense. That kid is being forced to be a slave (like many of the people who are trafficked for porn), and so it is an ethical problem to buy phones. I have no way of denying this. But this is a whataboutism.How about the Mexican guy that rotated your tires? What about the African kid that mined the lithium for your phone?
The point was that all work is demeaning and not really optional. And if you think most wagie jobs aren't incredibly degrading, you need to give your head a shake. Most of the people that work the jobs I listed basically have to do it or else they go hungry and get evicted. If a coal miner gets cancer or blows out his back, everyone's just dandy with that. A woman willingly opens her legs in an air-conditioned environment for 2 hours, you clutch your pearls and curse the heavens. I've spent the last ten-odd years being screeched at that sex work is real work. If that's true, it sounds like the complaints you've levied(besides sex-trafficking) boil down to "someone's job sucks and they don't want to do it". To which I say get in line. If anything, wouldn't their life be made worse by not having that last desperate means of paying their bills?I don't ever go to McDonald's, ew. But this comparison isn't even remotely fair. The wagie at McDonald's isn't doing something that's inherently dehumanizing and degrading. He's not committing career suicide. If he wants to work somewhere else afte McDonald's, he's capable of doing so, he doesn't have to worry about destroying his reputation. I think it's pretty obvious that doing porn and having a wagie job are worlds apart.
Again, nothing inherently dehumanizing or degrading in changing someone's tires. Perfectly honest work that needs to be done. The African kid that mined the lithium, that's the first example that actually makes sense. That kid is being forced to be a slave (like many of the people who are trafficked for porn), and so it is an ethical problem to buy phones. I have no way of denying this. But this is a whataboutism.
I'm all for stopping child (and adult) slavery, and that's why I've owned the same phone for the last 10 years, that being said, that's a whole different problem and trying to be ethical in one area doesn't mean that you have to suddenly be perfect everywhere else. The better it gets, the better it gets.
You meant a breakdown in collective society incentivizing people to prioritize their impulses and give up on their connections with others, right?
No. Porn can't be helpful or liberating. That's like saying that slavery can be helpful or liberating. It's already been established that porn harms the brain, there's no way around this. Not only that, but it's inherently damaging because it requires constant escalation.
DM me.I'm single.
All faggots are single, that's why your main sexual outlet is casual anonymous sex with dozens of new partners a year, every year, resulting in massive STD distribution in the faggot population about 1.5x higher than the general population. This is despite anal sex having less potential to spread numerous common STDs because the anal mucosa are less susceptible to successful infection by those STDsI'm single.
I spent years and years trying to stop and I never could, even though I knew it was wrong on all levels. I knew I was harming myself, I knew I was harming other people, and I knew it was just a coping mechanism.What made you stop?
[snip]
this is a retarded comparison on the face of it. jerking off is not an evil comparable to literal chattel slavery, you fuckin sperg. you're also talking about two different things here: porn use, and porn abuse. most things in life can be healthy if used in moderation, and destructive if used in excess. alcohol is an excellent social lubricant in moderation, but causes well-documented social and physical problems if used in excess. codeine cough syrup is an excellent medication if you need it, but a pretty dangerous drug if you use it recreationally (i.e. lean). porn is no different. porn use can be as simple as a man keeping his natural sexual desires under control, which is cool and good. the "constant escalation" part only comes into it if you're using porn to chase the dopamine rush for its own sake, in which case it is porn abuse, and like any other kind of abuse, it erodes you psychologically because you're putting the pleasure before your own health. nominal porn use does not hurt the brain, chronic porn use does.
No, there are just things that are wrong, period. This isn't even about the addictive nature of porn, it's about the ethical implications for others. It doesn't matter if you watch porn once a month or every single day, you're still driving up the demand for porn and trafficking with every search and every view.friend, it really does sound like you're projecting. I get the sense that you've turned your own personal demon into something much larger and more generally applicable than it actually is. if this is working for you in your own life, please continue judiciously. but I do believe we have a fundamental disagreement on the nature of pornography and its interaction with the human psyche. my opinion reflects my own experience with porn use, as I believe your opinion reflects yours, and they seem to be radically different in character.
No, there are just things that are wrong, period. This isn't even about the addictive nature of porn, it's about the ethical implications for others. It doesn't matter if you watch porn once a month or every single day, you're still driving up the demand for porn and trafficking with every search and every view.
Just because you do something that's wrong just a few times doesn't mean it's suddenly okay. It's not very complicated, really.
Research shows that porn consumption, even moderate porn consumption leads to viewing other humans more as objects. This happens even with drawn porn, written porn, etc. it doesn't matter. You're using the idea of a person to get yourself off, but it's merely the physicality of that person, not them as a whole that you're using. And that's effectively what we do when we consume porn, use others. It's not like an intimate sexual relationship where you actually connect more to the person, it's entirely one-sided. Even with fictional porn, you're viewing people as objects, not as human beings. This is also backed up by research, the part of the brain that activates when you watch porn is the part that deals with objects not with people.what about drawn or computer-generated porn, or homemade porn i.e. a couple posting recordings of their normal sex-having? I don't have hard statistics but I believe this represents a very significant (and growing) if not the majority share of porn being consumed on the internet these days.
Here's the problem: we have no idea if this is real or not. They could be a couple recording themselves and uploading it to the internet, or it could be trafficking. There's no way of knowing. And even if it were a couple willingly doing so, why are they doing such a thing? Would you personally do it? There's no way a person who's well emotionally and psychologically would cross those boundaries. Every interview I've seen with people who are in the porn industry reveals a fucked up childhood, most of the time sexual abuse is involved. So even that (onlyfans, people doing porn independently) would be taking advantage of very damaged people. (and fueling the demand for more)a couple posting recordings of their normal sex-having?