When will you stop being a coomer?

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Aether Witch

Aether Witch

Gay King, Master Gaylord of the Universe
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Dec 17, 2023
When will you stop contributing to the demand of prostitution and sex trafficking? When will you stop cooming your life away? When will you start treating yourself with the respect you deserve?
 
Sort by date Sort by votes
This website turned into a feminist shithole, of course "women" screech when one discusses the harmful effects of porn.
Personally, i think OP is an schizophrenic retard but he is mostly right about this, while it is true that if you watch porn you should stop because it is harmful for you on the long term, if you ruin your life because of it you were doomed to failure from the start.
 
Upvote 1 Downvote
I bought a bench press about ten years ago. Anytime I got the urge to coom, I did some sets until I tired myself out. Traded one habit for another.

That's really how it goes. For any addiction, your brain and body say, "its time, get to it." It's all a matter of rewiring those circuits. It'll take some time, but it'll happen eventually. All it takes is discipline.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Aether Witch said:
I've heard horror stories of coomers who get porn induced erectile dysfunction and even then, they keep masturbating with a flacid penis because they can't stop. So my recommendation to any coomers reading this is to stop as soon as possible.
Click to expand...
Damn that is horrific, surely they start to get callused dicks, it must get to the point of blood and pain, and yet they must still coom.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Aether Witch said:
Research shows that porn consumption, even moderate porn consumption leads to viewing other humans more as objects. This happens even with drawn porn, written porn, etc. it doesn't matter. You're using the idea of a person to get yourself off, but it's merely the physicality of that person, not them as a whole that you're using. And that's effectively what we do when we consume porn, use others. It's not like an intimate sexual relationship where you actually connect more to the person, it's entirely one-sided. Even with fictional porn, you're viewing people as objects, not as human beings. This is also backed up by research, the part of the brain that activates when you watch porn is the part that deals with objects not with people.
Click to expand...

your brain knows the difference between a person and an inanimate object, yes. but I don't buy that exposing yourself to a medium where you engage with inanimate representations of people leads to increasing inability to interface with real people as real people. if that were true, the link between video games and violence would be true, and, given the amount of violent games I play, I probably would have degenerated into a deranged murderer years ago. hell, every nonphysical medium would be a psychological peril, such as movies, TV, comics, books, perhaps even theater, anything that doesn't involve real-time interaction with a real person. in fact, the opposite is true - these forms of entertainment have the potential to inform us about the experiences of other people and expand our knowledge of the human condition, and experiencing relatable stories can actually increase your capacity for sympathy. so if watching movies doesn't destroy your ability to differentiate between real people and movie characters, why should porn have the same effect?

I'm sure there is research saying this or that, but I personally don't find that persuasive; the well has been too thoroughly poisoned when it comes (heh) to research being fudged to support somebody's ideological crusade. while research exists that says that enabling groomed children by giving them puberty blockers and gender therapy results in universally better outcomes in both the short- and long-term, the "research says" argument is, IMO, completely dead. I'm not gonna say it disproves your point or anything, obviously, I just personally don't find it convincing.

Aether Witch said:
Here's the problem: we have no idea if this is real or not. They could be a couple recording themselves and uploading it to the internet, or it could be trafficking. There's no way of knowing.
Click to expand...

I'll concede this point, but,

Aether Witch said:
And even if it were a couple willingly doing so, why are they doing such a thing? Would you personally do it? There's no way a person who's well emotionally and psychologically would cross those boundaries. Every interview I've seen with people who are in the porn industry reveals a fucked up childhood, most of the time sexual abuse is involved. So even that (onlyfans, people doing porn independently) would be taking advantage of very damaged people. (and fueling the demand for more)
Click to expand...

voyeurism is not an uncommon fetish, and a rather mild one if you ask me (at least outside of its most deranged forms); plenty of people find it exciting to be watched, especially as a form of validation (people online want to watch you fuck because you're hot). I suppose you could make an argument that letting the social corruption of internet content consumption intrude in your personal relationships constitutes a peril of some kind; however, I don't see any kind of evidence that it's universally destructive, or at least, destructive independent of whatever damage might be caused by their underlying psychology. at the very worst, it's just more weird sex shit people get up to in their grubby little lives. and besides, even if their behavior stems from some kind of sex abuse, I don't think it follows that the demand for amateur porn somehow deepends their psychological damage. in the case of child sex abuse, the damage has already been done, their experiences with and views on sex are changed forever. if they're into some weird sex shit, then they're just going to be into some weird sex shit and if that weird sex shit takes the form of posting pictures and videos of themselves online, then that's what they're gonna do. plenty of that shit existed (in a much more niche and perverted form, too) on the early internet before internet porn became a mainstream demand.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0 Downvote
I'm Retarded? said:
I don't buy that exposing yourself to a medium where you engage with inanimate representations of people leads to increasing inability to interface with real people as real people. if that were true, the link between video games and violence would be true, and, given the amount of violent games I play, I probably would have degenerated into a deranged murderer years ago.
Click to expand...
I've known people with porn addictions who had that exact issue though. I couldn't describe it better myself than that, "increasing inability to interface with real people as real people". What you say also makes sense however. I think the core issue is that porn isn't really comparable with games, it triggers a much more intense dopamine reward cycle in the brain than playing games does. Not just that but it's mainly about focus on content vs on presentation. You enjoy playing violent games presumably because the gameplay is fun and by extension it makes committing these virtual acts of violence fun. With porn, there's nothing fun about the mechanics of opening tabs and browsing porn sites, the reward comes from the visual and other stimulation caused by the content. Hence the more profound effects on a frequent viewer stemming from the nature of the content.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
WTBOnlineFather said:
I've known people with porn addictions who had that exact issue though. I couldn't describe it better myself than that, "increasing inability to interface with real people as real people". What you say also makes sense however. I think the core issue is that porn isn't really comparable with games, it triggers a much more intense dopamine reward cycle in the brain than playing games does. Not just that but it's mainly about focus on content vs on presentation. You enjoy playing violent games presumably because the gameplay is fun and by extension it makes committing these virtual acts of violence fun. With porn, there's nothing fun about the mechanics of opening tabs and browsing porn sites, the reward comes from the visual and other stimulation caused by the content. Hence the more profound effects on a frequent viewer stemming from the nature of the content.
Click to expand...

it seems to me you've got the cause-and-effect chain backwards. rather than the existence of porn deranging these otherwise normal individuals, it sounds like they have some kind of underlying psychological issue that resulted in them developing extremely destructive behaviors centered around porn. I suppose it's possible that games and porn represent different types of stimulation and the comparison may fail as a result. but "the visual and other stimulation caused by the content" is the whole body of the experience of engaging with any entertainment medium. in that respect, porn is fundamentally identical to gaming or movies etc., and where the experience of gaming is defined by its mechanics, audiovisual presentation, and so on, porn is defined by a similar spread of elements such as the appearance of the participant(s), the acts being performed, various aesthetic elements, the context, that sort of thing. this is why everyone has different tastes and, even in the case of addiction, the resulting psychological degeneration takes different people down different roads.

perhaps a better point to be made here is that some people are vastly more vulnerable to addictive behaviors than others, which is why you don't want somebody selling drugs on every street corner, even something as relatively harmless as weed. but internet porn is a ubiquitous presence that is incredibly accessible and easy to find. however, I think rather than blaming porn itself, it would be a better approach to promote the understanding of the psychological peril the internet represents generally. porn isn't the only trap waiting for people with weak impulse control, and if these people understood themselves and their world a bit better, and cultivated better self-discipline, porn would not represent such a potential danger for them, among other things.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
I'm Retarded? said:
it seems to me you've got the cause-and-effect chain backwards. rather than the existence of porn deranging these otherwise normal individuals, it sounds like they have some kind of underlying psychological issue that resulted in them developing extremely destructive behaviors centered around porn.
Click to expand...
It isn't a chain, it's a feedback loop. Certainly these people had various neuroses and predispositions to escape to vices like porn as cope, at the same time porn is inherently addictive and it's frequent consumption of increasingly depraved porn that can begin to warp your view of sex and relationships especially if you're also lonely, single and sexually inexperienced.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Will it shoot cum if I strap my dic-logo.png in my sprinkle system?
6-easy-steps-to-get-the-perfect-sprinkler-pump.jpg
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
I am not a coomer since i never cum

I merely jerk off the whole year while buliding up a insane load, then after a few mouths of letting my balls grow to a monstruous size, i like to point the big guy to my neighbour clothing line and let the river of sperm cover it all, so the motherfucker is always complaing to his wife that someone is swapping all his black suits into white ones, and that the folks at his office even started to call him "leisure suit larry"

heh, the dude has no ideia i am his nemesis :smug:
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom