What Happens When the Madness Ends? - Today’s corporate revolutionary enthusiasts had better prepare for the inevitable turn.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Victor Davis Hansen has one of the best takes on our current civil crisis. His writings are all that give me hope right now. He's talking about what could be the future if shit keeps getting stupid.

He's a Stanford professor who believes in straight talk. Not sure how he's not been cancelled yet, if more people listened to him I think he'd be out the door.


-----------------------------

What Happens When the Madness Ends?

When something cannot go on, it certainly will not go on. But what are the symptoms of what cannot go on and when?

There are two historic red lines and our revolution is getting close to both.

When Normal People Grow Weary

One is when “average” people, both white and nonwhite, who identify neither with Left nor Right, woke nor unwoke, become frightened or appalled by the violence and the anarchy—and thus finally move to dismantle the guillotine as the razor increasingly starts haircutting friends, idols, and compatriots.

Their verdict can be known either by demonstrating themselves, boycotting, voting, or massive civil disobedience. At some point, tonight’s hero on YouTube torching Wendy’s or kicking a downed policeman on CNN, becomes tomorrow’s commonplace, unnoticed felon—with a new warrant issued out on his head, and about whose fate and lengthy CV no one other than his parents much cares.

Governors and mayors can demand masks and all sorts of social distancing measures. But once they declared that only those not demonstrating—the non-looting and nonviolent—were subject to their rules, while millions both peacefully protesting and violently looting were exempt, then their words meant nothing. It will be impossible for them ever to be seen as credible again. Virus or no virus, crowded freeways, and busy malls will soon be referenda on the bond of governors like Gavin Newsom and Gretchen Whitmer.

In a few weeks, we are promised that multimillionaire NFL players and coaches in unison will not deign to stand up for the National Anthem. Promises, promises.

TV play-by-play announcers will praise them—or else likely lose their jobs. But millions of Americans simply will decouple from the NFL. Their silent disappearance will make the prior Kaepernick drop-off in attendance and viewership seem like child’s play. The same will be true perhaps of the more canny NBA, if they foolishly emulate the NFL. Millions will surmise that billionaire basketball players can far better make their billions in China and should—an NBA deity whose dictatorship players and coaches fear and worship while criticizing their own democracy.

Recently, there was murder in the CHAZ/CHOP-shop summer of love, and more random violence. Soon average Seattle citizens will want their city’s core back if only to reclaim their full 911 response. When the police begin not showing up for assaults, thefts, and break-ins, and criminals do what criminals do without consequences, the proverbial victims and vulnerable will have had enough and either move away or organize.

Today’s opportunist virtue-signaler will be tomorrow’s gullible fool. Tonight’s brave looter and edgy arsonist will be tomorrow’s matter-of-fact felon.

Governor Cuomo and Mayor de Blasio vie for televised braggadocio. But when the cameras leave, and they will soon, both will be left with billions of dollars in damage, lost commerce, bankrupt budgets, and urban flight. And their whiny appeals to American deplorables for financial assistance, their attempts at shaming clingers for a bailout, will likely be the stuff of comedy. What will California’s multimillionaire Governor Gavin Newsom do when his silly press conferences end, but his 13.3 percent income tax rate and 47-cent gas tax still don’t come close to closing his $50 billion annual deficit? Give more adolescent lectures about how the virus and lockdown are “reimagining a progressive era as it pertains to capitalism”?

When Important People Find Themselves Out of Luck

Second, when important people start to suffer the concrete consequences of their own abstract ideology, then the revolution sputters—in the manner that #MeToo Tara Reid got nowhere in accusing Joe Biden of a brutal sexual assault. Suddenly, handsy and heavily breathing Joe who once swore “women must be believed” appealed to statutes of limitations, presumptions of innocence, and the right to cross-examination as if he were Robespierre suddenly deploring the promiscuous use of the guillotine.

When hysteria fades, so too the current Antifa/BLM movement will go dormant to go enjoy the millions that they garnered from terrified virtue-signaling corporatists. When pistol-packing, AR-15 toting Raz Simone declares himself exempt from his own past homophobia and repulsive N-word vocabulary, and struts armed to the teeth at the head of his posse while blocking the police from aiding those shot and dying, then there is no society left. And those who want society back at some point will act, whether silently or visibly. Either Raz will be arrested—or bought off by a social justice Seattle billionaire and retired to a gifted lakeside home. Either way, he will go soon.

For all the conservatives who virtue signaled that Confederate statues had to come down now, the logical trajectory of their acquiesce was the toppling of Ulysses S. Grant, Columbus, and Father Junipero Serra, and the defacements of Lincoln, Jefferson, and Washington. And it won’t do to deplore the mob’s insanity when it turns on abolitionists, Cervantes, and black Civil War veterans. After all, from the time of the dismemberment of Cinna the Roman poet, that’s precisely what mobs do when appeased: turn on the innocent without apology.

Declaring that Confederate statutes must fall, but only through pro forma deliberation is fine and good. But prejudging that such democratic deliberations will reach the proper end results, sends the signal to the mob of “Well, why wait for a slowcoach vote that will only confirm our violence?” If a sober and judicious observer declares that all Confederate generals are the same and all their stone and bronze images are illegitimately on public display, and all their removals must result from and be confirmed by majority votes, then why have majority votes unless one believes in the legitimacy of the old Soviet Duma or Saddam’s Iraqi parliament?

Both liberals and conservatives have red lines, for without them there is no civilization in which liberals and conservatives can disagree without tribal and ritual violence. When would-be looters and defacers turned toward liberal Beverly Hills, they were met by politically incorrect tear gas. And behold, not a single former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff or retired military grandee was to be found to tweet out that America ended on that very day when those in the uniform tear-gassed civilians.

Nocturnally decapitating Robert E. Lee’s head in an obscure city park is one thing, marching in daylight on Stone Mountain with dynamite to erase the locus classicus of Confederate commemoration is quite another. Were that to happen, even Fort Bragg, California is not safe and the Wilson School at Princeton would be next in line for the guillotine.

Academics are now bombarded in their campus emails with lists of BLM demands and administrative acquiescence to them. But when the smoke clears and the flames subside, Hadley, Connor, and Palmer will have to give up their legacy spots at Stanford and Yale to meet demands for mandated increases in the size of the African-American student body. Will the edgy radical professor in his elbow patched tweed still virtue-signal from the lounge, when his kid’s 800 English SAT and straight-A prep school grades no longer are considered required admission data, and his salary in no way will match the donor heft of rival Silicon Valley tech parents?

When the frenzy subsides, what will universities themselves say after charging jacked up tuition and room and board costs for indebted students to take their classes on zoom from their parents’ basements? Will they cite “overhead” or praise the new “digital learning,” or institute “givebacks” of student payments, or claim new diversity coordinators and administrators to combat white privilege necessitate budgetary constraints?

What about the Chick-fil-A CEO—worried about corporate losses from vandalized stores and past bad PR from gay boycotts—who urged that whites wash the feet of black people? What will he do when it is again against the law to loot and deface, and when few of any racial lineage would enjoy such groveling hands on their feet?

The Thermador Reaction Is Coming

If a revolution is based on the untruth that blacks are daily violently terrorized by whites, what happens when data reveal facts contrary to that narrative? What happens when people come to understand that in those relatively rare interracial crimes, blacks are far more likely than whites to commit interracial violence? Or when people discover that more than 7,000 blacks are murdered per year by other blacks? When the hysteria fades, such data reasserts the truth that there is not currently a white racial war against blacks.

Now is the hour of the virtue tweeting has-been celebrity, who wishes to avoid the fate of Jimmies Fallon and Kimmel. Did the latter two, now on forced sabbaticals, think they are any more important to American entertainment than the beheaded Danton and Hébert were to the revolution of Robespierre and Saint-Just? In a cultural revolution, radicalism is a fluid and relative state, and no exemption from the violence that one advocates for others.

Just as reformers wanted King Louis XVI to give up some power but not to lose his head, so too peaceful protestors sought to institutionalize accountability for rogue cops. But also, just as a constitutional parliament was forgotten by the time of the Reign of Terror, so too the legitimate protests over George Floyd’s horrific death are now light-years distant from torching Santa Monica and defacing the World War II monument.

Instead, this is the unhinged age of the sexagenarian general mysteriously awakening from his politically incorrect slumber to publicly announce that he threw his suddenly despised framed picture of Robert E. Lee against his wall—as a good business hedge, or to rediscover mysteriously in his seventh decade that his lifelong association with Fort Bragg could be a liability in the suddenly petrified world of corporate clientage.

The Reign of Terror will end and the Thermidor reaction is on the horizon. Today’s opportunist virtue-signaler will be tomorrow’s gullible fool. Tonight’s brave looter and edgy arsonist will be tomorrow’s matter-of-fact felon. This morning’s memo-writing social justice executive and administrator will be seen as tomorrow’s rank abettor of McCarthyite persecutions. And the coveted and esteemed racial arsonist of the moment soon will become the ostracized segregationist.

Americans believe there is one thing more regrettable than a falsifier—and that is an opportunistic and careerist falsifier.
 
People did "rise against the left-wing lunacy", it was called the Russian Civil War. It lasted 5 years and killed 10+ million people. The left was not guaranteed to win that conflict at any point in time.

Keep in mind that the Whites outnumbered the Reds in most places, but the Reds won mainly because the Whites were too disorganized and prone to in-fighting.

Ironically, the American Woke Left of the 2010's and 2020's has a similar problem as the Russian White Army of the 1910's and 1920's.

The White Movement was a "big tent" comprised of Tsarists, conservatives, Orthodox Christians, classical liberals, Cossacks, and basically anyone who wasn't a communist, Muslim, or anarchist.

The communists were in the Red Movement, the anarchists were in the Black Army, which had allied with the Reds (and were liquidated when they outlived their usefulness) and the Muslims were part of the Basmachi militias who were generally anti-Bolshevik.

The Basmachi were considered on the same level of enmity as the Whites in the eyes of Lenin and the Bolsheviks, and the Black Army was small and at most, useful idiots for the Bolsheviks.

The Whites were a genuine threat but were also riddled with infighting because there were so many competing and ultimately incompatible ideologies and identities.

Because the Whites were too disorganized and wracked with internal conflicts, the Reds were able to destroy them in the Russian Civil War


The Woke Left is more or less the left-wing version of the White Movement in this analogy, at least in the sense that they've branded themselves as a big tent movement and their ranks are full of various competing groups who don't have much unification beyond "Fuck You, Dad!" and "Republicans Bad" and are already imploding as the different groups start vying for favor and control.

The Woke Left seems to be large in ranks and has all this institutional backing, but so did the White Army in the Russian Civil War.

The Allied Powers all sent forces to help the Whites and several major corporations backed the Whites since the Bolsheviks actually taking control of resource-rich Russia would be very bad for business (inb4 "muh Jews invented AstroTurf" sperging) and the Reds still won despite all this support and large numbers the Whites had.


Before people start branding me as an eternal optimist, I'm not saying this will happen here. All I am doing is pointing out a historical example and a few parallels between now and then.

Nobody knows what's going to happen come November and afterwards. Maybe Trump really is wanting to clamp down hard on all this, but needed to win a second term and gain favor with the GOP before he could do so.

The "nuclear option" executive orders he's recently set up seem to point in this direction, and his rhetoric at the Tulsa Rally more or less confirmed my theory that he's not trying to win black votes per se, but instead win moderate white votes and get enough black voters to stay home and not vote for Biden.

Then again, he could lose 2020 since the DNC are pulling out all the stops and employing every dirty trick in the book and it's not even July.
 
I was thinking the same thing in Washington with Fort Lewis. I'd love them to come see how effectively they'd get handled by an infantry company. They show up at night, whole base cuts electricity so its lights out and you'll just see through your nods a bunch of IR beams light these niggers up and they'd have no clue whats happening as they get magdumped on.
It's fun to think about but the ranks of .mil wouldn't allow much violence. They're already terrified at the higher levels about being 'white supremacists' because they recruit from generational families and really pull from the south. Add in the fact that cool shit and masculine dudes are nazi's by default, they'll end up telling everyone to stand down and fix bayonets while standing in a straight line in front of the armory, hoping the crowd doesn't come any closer until the police get there.

It would be an interesting thing to see the gear get reappropriated by fools, it's always fun watching retards try to drive tanks. It's not complex, but it's not intuitive if you've only ever ridden buses and bicycles.
 
It's fun to think about but the ranks of .mil wouldn't allow much violence. They're already terrified at the higher levels about being 'white supremacists' because they recruit from generational families and really pull from the south. Add in the fact that cool shit and masculine dudes are nazi's by default, they'll end up telling everyone to stand down and fix bayonets while standing in a straight line in front of the armory, hoping the crowd doesn't come any closer until the police get there.

It would be an interesting thing to see the gear get reappropriated by fools, it's always fun watching retards try to drive tanks. It's not complex, but it's not intuitive if you've only ever ridden buses and bicycles.
Depends if they have the same general or not. They don't shoot rubber bullets, only blanks with adapters or live rounds. There only like 3 guards at the gate am has 1st SF, 2nd Ranger Bat on top of battalions rapid deployable and who all seen combat, they've got a bunch of shit to protect and they don't fuck around when it comes to it. Ded srs dude, if you think that the general would be respected if he let the chimps burn down building on his bas, you'd be dead wrong. I am lik 95% sure if they rioted on FT Lewis, they'd be handled with prejudice.
 
Grow the fuck up and stop spewing this leadbrained Whig history bullshit. It stopped being "cool" to be a hippy by the mid 70s.

It's completely irrelevant whether being "hippy" is cool or not. If you look at the world before sexual revolution and after it, there is no game which one is better for all people. That revolution really changed our culture for the better, while the one happening now is just a regression back to moral busybodies taking control once again. I know that it's fun to LARP how everything was better "in the past", but truth be told, if you would live back then you would most likely hate it just like the people who lived back then hated it.
 
The great difference is also that back in the '68, people rebelled against objectively stupid shit. Western society as a whole had become fed up with the conservative moralism that was objectively a relic of the past and which held the society in a death-grip. Thus we had the hippies and the sexual revolution, which ultimately was a very good thing, as it birthed many of the good things we nowadays take for granted like sexual liberalism and in general liberal view of life. Back then it was objectively good thing to rebel, as it really pushed our cultural evolution forward and made the world ultimately better place.
Fuck off Hippie

Keep in mind that the Whites outnumbered the Reds in most places, but the Reds won mainly because the Whites were too disorganized and prone to in-fighting.

Ironically, the American Woke Left of the 2010's and 2020's has a similar problem as the Russian White Army of the 1910's and 1920's.

The White Movement was a "big tent" comprised of Tsarists, conservatives, Orthodox Christians, classical liberals, Cossacks, and basically anyone who wasn't a communist, Muslim, or anarchist.

The communists were in the Red Movement, the anarchists were in the Black Army, which had allied with the Reds (and were liquidated when they outlived their usefulness) and the Muslims were part of the Basmachi militias who were generally anti-Bolshevik.

The Basmachi were considered on the same level of enmity as the Whites in the eyes of Lenin and the Bolsheviks, and the Black Army was small and at most, useful idiots for the Bolsheviks.

The Whites were a genuine threat but were also riddled with infighting because there were so many competing and ultimately incompatible ideologies and identities.

Because the Whites were too disorganized and wracked with internal conflicts, the Reds were able to destroy them in the Russian Civil War


The Woke Left is more or less the left-wing version of the White Movement in this analogy, at least in the sense that they've branded themselves as a big tent movement and their ranks are full of various competing groups who don't have much unification beyond "Fuck You, Dad!" and "Republicans Bad" and are already imploding as the different groups start vying for favor and control.

The Woke Left seems to be large in ranks and has all this institutional backing, but so did the White Army in the Russian Civil War.

The Allied Powers all sent forces to help the Whites and several major corporations backed the Whites since the Bolsheviks actually taking control of resource-rich Russia would be very bad for business (inb4 "muh Jews invented AstroTurf" sperging) and the Reds still won despite all this support and large numbers the Whites had.


Before people start branding me as an eternal optimist, I'm not saying this will happen here. All I am doing is pointing out a historical example and a few parallels between now and then.

Nobody knows what's going to happen come November and afterwards. Maybe Trump really is wanting to clamp down hard on all this, but needed to win a second term and gain favor with the GOP before he could do so.

The "nuclear option" executive orders he's recently set up seem to point in this direction, and his rhetoric at the Tulsa Rally more or less confirmed my theory that he's not trying to win black votes per se, but instead win moderate white votes and get enough black voters to stay home and not vote for Biden.

Then again, he could lose 2020 since the DNC are pulling out all the stops and employing every dirty trick in the book and it's not even July.
I have to play devils advocate here: Isn't the American right wing also a disunited big tent group like the whites?

Consider how you have classical liberals, far right groups, neoconservatives, libertarians, neoconfederates, and traditionalists all claiming themselves to be right wing in the US; I've seen them absolutely rip into each other dismissing other factions as small, irrelevant, or targets who they will just treat like their enemies. I really don't think the right wing is unified in the US at all and when I point this out the sentiment I usually hear is that they can just push out/marginalize/purge the groups they disagree with. Hell, I don't think the definition of right is even defined, and instead is a title all these factions compete for.
 
Last edited:
That revolution really changed our culture for the better

It caused single motherhood rates to explode, especially in the African-American community, which is a major contributor to its disproportionate violent crime and crime victimization rates. Overall, it all but destroyed the nuclear family structure, which created a lot of insecure children without solid male role models, either picking shaky ones they weren't related to or leaving males to be emasculated or raised by the streets that could provide what they saw as more stable community. Divorce is more commonplace and easier to do, meaning that there's less incentive to really think out getting married, less incentive to keep a family together, and more incentive to screw over the other party in divorce proceedings.

Destabilizing the family could only destabilize society.

It also led us to devalue and commodify sex, taught us to treat the other as a sentient sex toy in a sexual encounter, and taught us to treat sex as a rite of passage and to feel angry and/or lacking about not getting it, which is a major driver in the "incel" movement. It led to the explosion of the pornography industry, which led to free internet pornography, which led to disturbing amounts of children being exposed to pornography at the age of 11 because the industry has no incentive to fight to keep kids from viewing their material.
 
Last edited:
It caused single motherhood rates to explode, especially in the African-American community, which is a major contributor to its disproportionate violent crime and crime victimization rates. Overall, it all but destroyed the nuclear family structure, which created a lot of insecure children without solid male role models, either picking shaky ones they weren't related to or leaving them to be emasculated or raised by the streets that could provide what they saw as more stable community.

It led us to devalue and commodify sex, taught us to treat the other as a sentient sex toy in a sexual encounter, and taught us to treat sex as a rite of passage and to feel angry and/or lacking about not getting it, which is a major driver in the "incel" movement.


And you would rather live in a society where having pre-marital sex destroys your societal standing just like the woke crowd nowadays destroys those who oppose their orthodoxy? Sex is the most natural thing we can engage in, and it's just inhumane and to put it frankly, fucking stupid to repress it on societal scale as was done in the past. Trying to force such urges to manifest only in some approved way only breeds perversions(as evidenced by catholic church) and a culture where everyone is cheating on their partners constantly. Do you really love to live in a world built on lies that much?
 
And you would rather live in a society where having pre-marital sex destroys your societal standing just like the woke crowd nowadays destroys those who oppose their orthodoxy?

Premarital sex, at best, produced parents that didn't even become proper members of society at that point, but generally created single mothers-- either possibility justified the stark stigma against it, talk less of all its other deleterious effects. We'll always have stigmas against some things, so it only makes sense to have stigmas against that which actually causes or unnecessarily risks harm.

Sex is the most natural thing we can engage in, and it's just inhumane and to put it frankly, fucking stupid to repress it on societal scale as was done in the past.

And creating millions of fatherless homes, making our children more susceptible to corruptive influences, isn't "fucking stupid"? Entrenching entire communities in crime and poverty because you can't keep it in your damn pants isn't "fucking stupid"?

Our society is going to hell because you want to bust nuts in people.
 
Last edited:
Our society is going to hell because you want to bust nuts in people.

You really think that our society is going to hell because people are having sex out of wedlock? Way to go there, I personally think that our society is going to hell because SJW's and their ilk are bringing back moral outrage in modern packaging. And also because people like you are LARP-tripping too hard on "bringing back the good ol'days".

People have free will to choose or not to choose to use contraception when engaging in sexual activities. It's not my fault if they choose to not do so. Repressing their urges through society-wide application of moral codes that are inherently antithetical to human existence is not an option, however. In the past it was much more commonplace to cheat on your spouse. I ask again, do you really want to live in a world built on lies? People will want to fuck because it's built in to our very being, and they will not cease to do so no matter how hard you try to command them to "keep it in their pants". Where is the value in trying to uphold illusions to otherwise?
 
You really think that our society is going to hell because people are having sex out of wedlock?

Yes. That's certainly part of it, but that's just a contributor to the single motherhood issue as that's what many such cases result from.

Way to go there, I personally think that our society is going to hell because SJW's and their ilk are bringing back moral outrage in modern packaging. And also because people like you are LARP-tripping too hard on "bringing back the good ol'days".

Progress is great if you have a good reason to progress in a particular direction beyond "why not". Emulating the past is also good if you're not just idolizing the past. You're incapable of understanding what got us here because the extent of your thinking is pre-rehearsed talking points and the internet, so you just agonize about the "SJWs" and fail to respond to any of the points I've made about the blight of single motherhood and the destruction of the traditional family structure-- that kind of thinking is also what leaves people thinking that black people are just inferior people instead of people that were manipulated on a community level by people that succeeded in understanding what you don't even care to confront.

Single motherhood is bad, its incidence exploded in the wake of the sexual revolution, it's destroyed the nuclear family structure in this country, and it's created millions of insecure children-- many of whom are the SJWs that torment you so, others who are just outright criminals, still others who are just weak of mind. It has sustained an industry that thrives off the exploitation and abuse of women and the exploitation of the sexual urges of man and woman alike. It has encouraged men and women that hollow sexual connections on the level of playing video games is desirable, nay, a necessary part of life, instead of something that's a part of the complex of the family unit, to be shared with one person you've chosen to commit to for life.

People have free will to choose or not to choose to use contraception when engaging in sexual activities. It's not my fault if they choose to not do so.

But it becomes a burden to them and to society when they fail to and they conceive in a suboptimal social environment.

Repressing their urges through society-wide application of moral codes that are inherently antithetical to human existence is not an option, however.

What the hell are you talking about? There hasn't been a time in the history of civilization where we haven't done that.
 
Last edited:
But millions of Americans simply will decouple from the NFL. Their silent disappearance will make the prior Kaepernick drop-off in attendance and viewership seem like child’s play.
Bullshit, they are starved for anything. Ratings are going to be through the roof.
 
Even now.

I am having trouble deciding whether the guy you're arguing with doesn't see the contradiction in what he's saying or he is trying to ineffectually troll.

I mean... what is firing people for insufficient support of BLM if not a "[repression of people's] urges through society-wide application of moral codes that are inherently antithetical to human existence," exactly?
 
He talking about proposition 209. Its on the ballot and we will see in November how this state votes.

Doesn't matter how they vote, that shit's illegal at the Federal level and will be smashed to bits by the courts, you cannot have a "Skin color X zone" only.... at least not that blatantly, affirmative action was a sneaky way to get the same result with a veneer of legality, but the RIGHT SIDE OF HISTORY fucks that think that they now can just blatantly put "No whites need apply" on the forms.... Unless I'm missing something extremely obvious, "Separate but Equal" is still inherently unequal until and unless the USSC reverses that.

It's a delusional and doomed power-trip at worst, an empty virtue signal at best
 
I am having trouble deciding whether the guy you're arguing with doesn't see the contradiction in what he's saying or he is trying to ineffectually troll.

I mean... what is firing people for insufficient support of BLM if not a "[repression of people's] urges through society-wide application of moral codes that are inherently antithetical to human existence," exactly?

I was referring to sexual morals, which was the whole point of my conversation with Zero Day Defence. But then again, this is like participating in paraolympics anyway at this point.
 
I think the question is more "what do we do now" than an argument over whether the past was better. In the past, we also had situations where women were blamed for being raped, and they and the resulting baby (when abortion was unavailable) lived in terrible conditions. Sex crimes in the Catholic church are a good example of the festering rot that occurs when unpalatable things are swept under the rug. Not that degeneracy solves anything, but a draconian clamping down would not be helpful either, and I think we all know it is not possible to press rewind and start over.

If any headway is to be made, it'll have to start at the level of education. The school system is a disaster, and neither (most) parents nor schools and colleges are actually teaching kids to think critically, debate civilly, or analyze data and arguments presented to them. It's all "social justice" and "muh feelz." Personal responsibility has to be in there as well. Stop glorifying obesity and victimhood, and stop handing out useless degrees in "gender studies."

I also have no idea how we're going to get political candidates that aren't either in some company's pocket and care nothing for those they supposedly serve, or else radical globalist leftists who push identity politics as a tool of dividing and conquering the populace. It's a choice of rotten apples at the polls.
 
Yes. You may have heard that California revoked their Civil Rights act in order to have "black only spaces" from which people of other ethnic groups are excluded. That is some unamerican rank fucking bullshit right there and it must not be tolerated.

I support black-only private spaces. I also support white-only, men's only, Christian-only, and so forth. Forcing people to integrate has been a disaster.
 
Back
Top Bottom