Washington Post begins sweeping layoffs - Sports coverage and the paper's podcast are among those hit the hardest as the storied newspaper struggles with declining revenue.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
NBC News - Archive
The Washington Post announced sweeping layoffs Wednesday, with cuts expected to greatly reduce some coverage areas at the storied 150-year-old newspaper.

The wide-ranging job losses primarily affected the sports, books and podcast units, according to a source familiar with the situation. Foreign desks were also heavily impacted, along with cuts to business and national teams. “The Washington Post is taking a number of difficult but decisive actions today for our future, in what amounts to a significant restructuring across the company," a Post spokesperson told NBC News.

The Post, which has won dozens of Pulitzer prizes — most famously for its Watergate coverage that led to Richard Nixon’s resignation in 1974 — has been owned since 2013 by Amazon founder Jeff Bezos.
Though many American newspapers have struggled financially in recent years, Bezos is the fourth-richest person in the world, with a net worth of about $260 billion, according to Bloomberg’s Billionaire Index. That hasn't spared the paper from layoffs. The latest round of layoffs follows a 4% staff cut roughly a year ago, though those cuts did not affect the newsroom.
In response to the announcement, the Washington Post Guild, which represents hundreds of newsroom employees, said the staff has been reduced by 400 people over the last three years. "These layoffs are not inevitable. A newsroom cannot be hollowed out without consequences of its credibility, its reach and its future," the union said.

The announcement follows recent scrutiny over newsroom budget decisions, including the paper’s shifting plans around Winter Olympics coverage.

As first reported by The New York Times, the paper initially told more than a dozen journalists it would no longer send them to cover the Winter Olympics in Italy, less than three weeks before the Games were set to begin. After public criticism, including from prominent sports journalists, the paper reversed course again and now expects to send four reporters, NBC News confirmed.
In a statement, former Post editor Marty Baron said Wednesday’s announcement “ranks among the darkest days in the history of one of the world’s greatest news organizations.”
And ahead of the layoffs, members from the Post’s local desk wrote in an open letter dated Jan. 27 to Bezos that they had been warned their section would be “decimated” and left “unrecognizable,” urging leadership to preserve the paper’s local coverage.
Similarly, the guild had also warned in the days leading up to Wednesday’s announcement that the cuts could “potentially leave our newsroom even smaller than the one [Bezos] purchased — and losing twice as much money.
Several journalists confirmed in posts on X that they were among those laid off. They include: Caroline O’Donovan, who covers Amazon at the Post; Nicole Asbury, an education reporter covering Maryland; and Emmanuel Felton, a race and ethnicity reporter, who wrote, "this wasn’t a financial decision, it was an ideological one."
The media industry has entered a broader period of reckoning, with both legacy players — from broadcast giants to newspapers — and digital outlets grappling with rising costs and debt-ridden balance sheets as audiences shift how they consume news.
Declining advertising revenue and intensifying competition have pushed companies to accelerate cost-cutting moves and restructure plans across the industry.
As a result, recent years have been marked by repeated rounds of layoffs and consolidation as media companies attempt to realign their businesses with a rapidly evolving landscape.
Most recently, Netflix has moved to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery as consolidation pressures intensify, while rival Paramount Global continues to pursue its own bid after merging with Skydance Media last year. CBS, under the new leadership of Bari Weiss, is also seeking to reinvent itself and has reportedly been considering additional layoffs. Weiss, the founder of the heterodox opinion publication The Free Press, joined CBS News as editor-in-chief last year.
But signs of strain across the industry have been building for years. Disney underwent a major restructuring in 2023, cutting roughly 7,000 jobs and reorganizing the business ahead of a planned CEO transition later this year.
Legacy newspapers have also been hit hard. The Los Angeles Times has carried out multiple rounds of layoffs in recent years, most recently enacting another 6% reduction to its newsroom in mid-2025.
The shift to digital-first platforms has not insulated news organizations from cuts, either. BuzzFeed shuttered its news division in 2023, while Vice Media filed for bankruptcy the same year. Business Insider also recently cut more than 20% of its workforce as it scaled back in some areas, while simultaneously accelerating its adoption of artificial intelligence — another area of investment permanently reshaping the industry.
And last year, as its corporate parent, Comcast, prepared to spin off its cable channels as Versant, NBC News Group laid off about 150 employees, representing about 2% of its workforce.
 
fired.jpg

bezos.jpg
 
That and the fact that Nixon actively resisted the counter cultural subversion of the 1960s and the hippies that got beaten at protests in the 60s under him grew up and got institutional power and rewrote history to make him a cartoon villain.
View attachment 8518669
They hated Nixon because he was right.

I’m here to dab on journalist tears. You have to be retarded to try to have a career in journalism in current year +10.
 
I'm surprised the sports writers aren't considered profitable since sports sells ads, generally, but maybe the Wash Post just doesn't have enough straight male readers. Or they had a bunch of writers covering the WNBA and women's running or some shit.
Chances are they are intentionally cutting those jobs to subsidize lower-paying, propagandistic ones. If the WaPo had only two writers left, one a schizophrenic commie who writes half an article every 6 months about Drumpf bad and another one coming in to the office every day to write about sports and food and the latest trends, they would fire the latter just to free up resources to artificially prop up the former.
 
That and the fact that Nixon actively resisted the counter cultural subversion of the 1960s and the hippies that got beaten at protests in the 60s under him grew up and got institutional power and rewrote history to make him a cartoon villain.
View attachment 8518669
He was the finest commie hunter the US government had, unlike the cartoonish buffoon McCarthy. He went after real reds like Alger Hiss, not movie stars.
 
Who reads long book reviews in 2026 in a traditional newspaper? You can get short reviews online from Goodreads.
I would read long book reviews, I would even pay for long book reviews. However:
  • the culture is fractured, and a random review is unlikely to cover anything interesting
  • newspapers want subscriptions from cultists, who'd cancel if a newspaper is ever honest
  • limited space means newspapers have to be picky
    • they'd rather platform popular globohomos than bash based books
      • journos are hated, bashing a based book would be free advertising
  • people don't really read books, therefore book reviews are useless even as ads (to increase popularity and sales), their purpose is to virtue-signal: look, we like the new antiracist baby book that you already know you're supposed to like

There's a scenario where the military is sent in to a fictional country and these American reporters are embedded with enemy forces and these forces are about to ambush and kill American soldiers. They ask these two reporters, Dan Rather and Peter Jennings, if they would alert the American troops. Jennings said he would, then Rather said he wouldn't because getting the story was more important than alerting their countrymen.
There is a gay "intellectual" argument for "getting the story": alerting the troops would prevent them, and other journos, from ever "getting stories", and will likely kill them, and "stories" may be useful intel that'd save more lives in the long term. Where it fails is the completely libshit fantasy of the scenario: no country fighting Americans is going to believe in the American religion of democracy and allow American journos (American spies) to accompany their military.

List of journalists killed and missing in Vietnam: obviously none of them were embedded with the VC, one had to be on something stronger than weed to even suggest it.
 
There were Washington Post staffers, current and now former, making cases that Bezos could've kept the paper in business for centuries at a $100 million/year burn rate before he ran out of money. Ignoring the financial illiteracy, the not understanding that net worth doesn't represent a bunch of money hoarded in a vault or something, the sheer arrogance of demanding someone subsidize your oh-so important agitprop that clearly, going by the financials, the general populace does not read and/or is not willing to pay for is really fascinating to witness.

If he really wanted to play hardball, Bezos should just force these overpaid journalists, convinced their job is advocacy, to fund the paper entirely off a 4 day donation telethon where they are made to grovel in a livestream about how valuable the latest reporting on which hobby/industry/zip code is subject to "unbearable" whiteness, the latest bowel movement Trump took and how it's outrageous and the END OF DEMOCRACY, or running interference for the latest terrorist 86'd by the US military is.

With a simple donation of $100, you can fund Jelani Sekou Mbara's important work peering into the struggles of the Black community under Trump's regime for three whole hours
 
There is a gay "intellectual" argument for "getting the story": alerting the troops would prevent them, and other journos, from ever "getting stories", and will likely kill them, and "stories" may be useful intel that'd save more lives in the long term. Where it fails is the completely libshit fantasy of the scenario: no country fighting Americans is going to believe in the American religion of democracy and allow American journos (American spies) to accompany their military.
No, but they will let Hollywood actresses make propaganda photos for them.
1770300733870.png
 
Bezos could've kept the paper in business for centuries at a $100 million/year burn rate
I really wonder sometimes if they ever did any form of internal analysis on the worth of the individual position and the journalist filling it to the news paper.
If they did, I wish someone would publish it. Because the hard economic facts usually kill all the bullshittery.

I bet you they did a real good analysis and concluded that all the people being fired were not just dead weight holding the company back, they actively harmed the company overall by burning money they did not have, or could have used elsewhere.
 
I really wonder sometimes if they ever did any form of internal analysis on the worth of the individual position and the journalist filling it to the news paper.
If they did, I wish someone would publish it. Because the hard economic facts usually kill all the bullshittery.

I bet you they did a real good analysis and concluded that all the people being fired were not just dead weight holding the company back, they actively harmed the company overall by burning money they did not have, or could have used elsewhere.
There was a chick who got laid off whose beat was something like black inequality in publishing.
Not like, her beat was arts & culture and this was where she specialized, whining about the unbearable whiteness of a field that hasn't given an award to a white man in 20 years, to the point that even normal people are starting to say it's getting a tad discriminatory, but black inequality, in that field, was her entire beat.
 
"Democracy dies in darkness. We can't afford to pay our electric bill anymore."

"Support independent journalism. Most of our writers are now completely independent".

We have 2 of 3 paid writers remaining, Already have an account? Please Login.
 
Back
Top Bottom