Washington Post begins sweeping layoffs - Sports coverage and the paper's podcast are among those hit the hardest as the storied newspaper struggles with declining revenue.

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
NBC News - Archive
The Washington Post announced sweeping layoffs Wednesday, with cuts expected to greatly reduce some coverage areas at the storied 150-year-old newspaper.

The wide-ranging job losses primarily affected the sports, books and podcast units, according to a source familiar with the situation. Foreign desks were also heavily impacted, along with cuts to business and national teams. “The Washington Post is taking a number of difficult but decisive actions today for our future, in what amounts to a significant restructuring across the company," a Post spokesperson told NBC News.

The Post, which has won dozens of Pulitzer prizes — most famously for its Watergate coverage that led to Richard Nixon’s resignation in 1974 — has been owned since 2013 by Amazon founder Jeff Bezos.
Though many American newspapers have struggled financially in recent years, Bezos is the fourth-richest person in the world, with a net worth of about $260 billion, according to Bloomberg’s Billionaire Index. That hasn't spared the paper from layoffs. The latest round of layoffs follows a 4% staff cut roughly a year ago, though those cuts did not affect the newsroom.
In response to the announcement, the Washington Post Guild, which represents hundreds of newsroom employees, said the staff has been reduced by 400 people over the last three years. "These layoffs are not inevitable. A newsroom cannot be hollowed out without consequences of its credibility, its reach and its future," the union said.

The announcement follows recent scrutiny over newsroom budget decisions, including the paper’s shifting plans around Winter Olympics coverage.

As first reported by The New York Times, the paper initially told more than a dozen journalists it would no longer send them to cover the Winter Olympics in Italy, less than three weeks before the Games were set to begin. After public criticism, including from prominent sports journalists, the paper reversed course again and now expects to send four reporters, NBC News confirmed.
In a statement, former Post editor Marty Baron said Wednesday’s announcement “ranks among the darkest days in the history of one of the world’s greatest news organizations.”
And ahead of the layoffs, members from the Post’s local desk wrote in an open letter dated Jan. 27 to Bezos that they had been warned their section would be “decimated” and left “unrecognizable,” urging leadership to preserve the paper’s local coverage.
Similarly, the guild had also warned in the days leading up to Wednesday’s announcement that the cuts could “potentially leave our newsroom even smaller than the one [Bezos] purchased — and losing twice as much money.
Several journalists confirmed in posts on X that they were among those laid off. They include: Caroline O’Donovan, who covers Amazon at the Post; Nicole Asbury, an education reporter covering Maryland; and Emmanuel Felton, a race and ethnicity reporter, who wrote, "this wasn’t a financial decision, it was an ideological one."
The media industry has entered a broader period of reckoning, with both legacy players — from broadcast giants to newspapers — and digital outlets grappling with rising costs and debt-ridden balance sheets as audiences shift how they consume news.
Declining advertising revenue and intensifying competition have pushed companies to accelerate cost-cutting moves and restructure plans across the industry.
As a result, recent years have been marked by repeated rounds of layoffs and consolidation as media companies attempt to realign their businesses with a rapidly evolving landscape.
Most recently, Netflix has moved to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery as consolidation pressures intensify, while rival Paramount Global continues to pursue its own bid after merging with Skydance Media last year. CBS, under the new leadership of Bari Weiss, is also seeking to reinvent itself and has reportedly been considering additional layoffs. Weiss, the founder of the heterodox opinion publication The Free Press, joined CBS News as editor-in-chief last year.
But signs of strain across the industry have been building for years. Disney underwent a major restructuring in 2023, cutting roughly 7,000 jobs and reorganizing the business ahead of a planned CEO transition later this year.
Legacy newspapers have also been hit hard. The Los Angeles Times has carried out multiple rounds of layoffs in recent years, most recently enacting another 6% reduction to its newsroom in mid-2025.
The shift to digital-first platforms has not insulated news organizations from cuts, either. BuzzFeed shuttered its news division in 2023, while Vice Media filed for bankruptcy the same year. Business Insider also recently cut more than 20% of its workforce as it scaled back in some areas, while simultaneously accelerating its adoption of artificial intelligence — another area of investment permanently reshaping the industry.
And last year, as its corporate parent, Comcast, prepared to spin off its cable channels as Versant, NBC News Group laid off about 150 employees, representing about 2% of its workforce.
 
"These layoffs are not inevitable. A newsroom cannot be hollowed out without consequences of its credibility, its reach and its future,"
So even after years of seeing the writing on the wall, these urinalists are still lying to either themselves or us.

When you see the kvetchery on social media, please remind them that they chose this when they decided to attack and undermine normal people, while airing propaganda as news.
 
Suffa journos. Remember, rope is cheap at Home Depot.
The wide-ranging job losses primarily affected the sports, books and podcast units
I'm surprised the sports writers aren't considered profitable since sports sells ads, generally, but maybe the Wash Post just doesn't have enough straight male readers. Or they had a bunch of writers covering the WNBA and women's running or some shit.

Who reads long book reviews in 2026 in a traditional newspaper? You can get short reviews online from Goodreads.
 
Go be a reporter in Africa, you sped.
Mr. Felton looks like the nerdy character from a '90s nigger sitcom.

Screenshot_20260204_181841.jpg
 
The newsroom at WaPo destroyed the paper's reputation by going all-in on woke and then bit the hand that fed them with all their anti-Bezos posting on their personal social media.

What did they think was going to happen? Even a man with more money than God isn't going to subsidize something of no value that insults him.
 
Last edited:
The Post, which has won dozens of Pulitzer prizes — most famously for its Watergate coverage that led to Richard Nixon’s resignation in 1974 — has been owned since 2013 by Amazon founder Jeff Bezos.
That's great, they did something over 50 years ago. They're not doing anything useful now and are another paper in all but name.
 
So even after years of seeing the writing on the wall, these urinalists are still lying to either themselves or us.

When you see the kvetchery on social media, please remind them that they chose this when they decided to attack and undermine normal people, while airing propaganda as news.

There's also the assumption made by them that the only journalists worth listening to are the big name ones. Youtubers and random joes on X have done far more traditional journalism than people who work for WP.
 
Lmao the his keep coming for the Washington Post and the LA times (LA times laid off 114 people in early 2025 iirc)
 
What's even the point of these journofags, at this point? Even when they aren't lying to advance globohomo, they are worthless at their jobs. That Nick Shirley blew open billions in fraud in Minnesota with nothing but a couple of cameras, at age 23, but I am supposed to think yellow journal rags like the Washington Post are worth a single thing? I hope every journalist except James O'Keefe ends up homeless and in the streets.
 
Why the fuck does any newspaper need 800 fucking workers? It's not like ANY are doing some investigative shit, you'd have better luck finding real controversies on youtube.

Have 1 guy on every big sport, 20 on national news, 20 for global news, 20 for gossip and media, and 10 niche subjects. As well as 10 editors and 3 guys to run the site. That's less than 100 employees and more than enough for any constant diverse media stream. If someone doesn't write at least two articles a day he needs to be fired.

It's like fucking every legacy body is over bloated while giving shit content.
 
That Nick Shirley blew open billions in fraud in Minnesota with nothing but a couple of cameras, at age 23
It was very telling that multiple big subreddits could only counter him by...bringing up past stupidity, rather than the report itself. Literally attacking Shirley, the person, and not what was actually in the report. For example:
 
Back
Top Bottom