Warren Lynch Shitpost General - TRUE and HONEST (former) John Flynt for Congress campaign worker

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
District 8 most definitely does have the capacity to support a tech boom, and in fact needs one badly. Stephen Lynch is not going to bring back all the factory jobs lost from all the plants that closed down the past few years. But the district is highly educated and underemployed, and tech could come to places like Bridgewater and Brockton in a way that would help the community in a way that more tech in Somerville is not going to. And also make more sense for the company itself.
Yes I talk to working class people of color a fair bit about immigration. Opinions vary. And no, H1B immigrants are not illegal immigrants. Nor do I think H1B is definitely the best system forever. I just agree with Pramila's amendment.
 
H1B immigrants are not illegal immigrants. Nor do I think H1B is definitely the best system forever. I just agree with Pramila's amendment.

Yeah I know H1Bs are not illegal, I was asking about what they thought about illegal immigration. But as with the H1B case though: whose interests are really being served by giving breathing space for people who break the law? Of course I'm in total agreement that illegal immigrants should be treated humanely, but I'm sorry bro, they broke the law and they gots to go.
 
Do you have a similar obsessive file on the times she WAS nice? Because I think that balance scale might have a thumb on it, lol. You should hang out with her IRL, she is pretty nice. I think everybody is meaner on the Internet. I know I myself have called the Malden City Council the most shocking things with a keyboard in front of me :)

But I like the mean things she said to GamerGate trolls and Nazi trolls. If she got y'all confused with them a few times, I made the same mistake myself. I don't know all the details of GamerGate but it sure attracted a lot of woman haters. And the "alt right", ugh, nobody likes those jerks.

@Kroster ninja'd.

Warren, you're claiming that John is not as bad as we say and who knows? Maybe he does put up a good front IRL. That being said, while John may not be Ted Bundy, we have thousands of pages of documented evidence that he is most definitely NOT a nice human being on balance. Can I ask: what do you know about his video game company, Giant SpaceKat? (This may have been asked before so forgive me if you've already answered, but I'd like to pick up the thread again.)
 
Yeah I know H1Bs are not illegal, I was asking about what they thought about illegal immigration. But as with the H1B case though: whose interests are really being served by giving breathing space for people who break the law? Of course I'm in total agreement that illegal immigrants should be treated humanely, but I'm sorry bro, they broke the law and they gots to go.
The interests of the voters of Chelsea, Somerville, Boston and a few others, who decided ICE should F off.
 
I'm not gonna get into the autistic maelstrom known as GamerGate but it is clear to me that you are misinformed about it, which I don't blame you for in the slightest because it was one colossal media misinformation campaign from start to finish and it's hard to fault a casual observer for thinking the way that you did. Let's just say that 48 hours ago you thought that this was an alt-right masturbation club and hopefully you have since adjusted your view, even if only slightly.

To repeat: what can you tell me about Brianna's company, Giant SpaceKat, aside from GamerGate bullshittery? Also, perhaps you could help us out by giving some examples about when Brianna was nice in public? And I don't mean just saying nice things, but actually going out of his way to do something altruistically or because he believed in something.

The interests of the voters of Chelsea, Somerville, Boston and a few others, who decided ICE should F off.

This is sleight of hand, dude. I'm going to assume that you think such voters are progressive. WHY is it progressive to think that ICE should fuck off?
 
On policy issues we 100% agree, as far as I can tell. Maybe she's a bit more anti-gun than me?.

You mentioned earlier you like Brianna because you think she is honest, unlike other politicians, and doesn't just say what you want to hear. With that in mind, doesn't it seem a little odd you two agree 100% on everything? What makes you think Wu, who has a very well documented history of lying about both big and small issues, isn't just saying exactly what you want to hear? Using the Bernie stuff as an example, I think we can both agree Wu is very open and public with her thoughts and typically shares them through Twitter. It's cool that she's told you she was wrong for saying negative things about Bernie and now she's totally a Berniebro and all that jazz, but it isn't something she's ever said publicly. It seems like something she's specifically said to you and only you because you're pretty open about how much you look up to Bernie, so naturally it would appeal to you.

On an unrelated note, genuine thanks for being a good sport about these threads and taking the time to answer questions and engage in discussion. I'm sure you've realized a lot of us disagree with you and think some of your views might be pretty out there, but I'd like to think we've also acknowledged you care about what you're doing and putting way more effort into this than Wu is. The fact you aren't just here to call us nazi's because we disagree with you is refreshing.

But going along that same wavelength, now that you've seen what's going on here, do you have any second thoughts about the level of harassment Brianna claims she previously received/still receives from the internet? I realize we aren't the only ones online to show an interest in Brianna, but we also have what, 3k pages of posts about her spread throughout three threads, and a few dozen more through a subforum. But, I think you can see we're not exactly a malicious group and haven't done anything to harass her, certainly not to the extent of throwing bricks through her window or murdering her dogs or hacking her site or all those other things she's accused us of. Building off of that, now that you've seen we can actually be pretty civil and really just want to ask a bunch of questions, would you consider encouraging Brianna to come here to clear the air and maybe even answer a few policy questions? I'm sure you've noticed by now a lot of us are genuinely interested in her platform, and hell, there's even a couple of us that can actually vote in her district.
 
Warren, what does Brianna do all day? She has no day job, does no volunteer work, and still does 1/100 the amount of any other candidate I see and most of them have full time jobs, volunteer work and families. Why are you doing everything while she does literally nothing? Can you list 7 practical things she's done for her campaign over the past 7 days?
 
Do you have a similar obsessive file on the times she WAS nice? Because I think that balance scale might have a thumb on it, lol. You should hang out with her IRL, she is pretty nice. I think everybody is meaner on the Internet. I know I myself have called the Malden City Council the most shocking things with a keyboard in front of me :)

I have no doubt she's nice to you in person, but consider what she's actually doing to you and perhaps she looks a little bit less nice. We've seen 6 months worth of FEC reports of her campaign and in that time she's paid you $2000. I've had a look at other campaigns FEC reports, and it's generally the case that their staff members are salaried employees earning more than 1000 bucks every month. It's not like Wu can't afford to actually employ you on a decent salary, and considering how much leg work you seem to be doing for the campaign it seems like you ought to be employed and also compensated from petty cash for the mileage you put in driving around to all the places you have to go for Wu's sake, that can't be cheap.

When @Kroster asked you why nobody was endorsing Wu, you immediately blamed yourself for not putting in enough work. Well, you'd know better than us if you truly are slacking off, but ask yourself... are you really getting enough support for this job and are you really the right person to have been assigned it in the first place? You're a complete novice at the job thrown in the deep end and expected to perform miracles. That sounds like a failure of management to me.

Also, do you realise that it's usual for the staff who work on political campaigns to move to the principle's permanent staff if they're elected? Has Brianna ever discussed with you her plans for if she does get elected? I'm guessing not, since that would involve actually knowing what the office actually involves.
 
Do you have a similar obsessive file on the times she WAS nice? Because I think that balance scale might have a thumb on it, lol.
No politician should have reason to fear people looking into records on their personal history and actions. If they do, it's a sign that there's something wrong. Smokescreening the issue with claims that "other politicians are even worse" is tangential to this issue.

With that in mind, how do you respond to accusations like the ones in this article? You have to admit that among the flashy gadgets, sports cars, and Silicon Valley poser shit it's getting hard for her to dodge the "limousine liberal" accusations, and that's assuming our exhaustively sourced records on her extremely wealthy background and lifestyle aren't accurate.

Additionally, is she aware that you're here? Because she's famously skittish about addressing anything to do with us. We're something of a boogeyman in certain circles.
Boo.
 
Honestly, your posts here might be some of the best truthful publicity Brianna has ever received, leagues better than the typical brown-nosing wank piece.
I can see how you might have convinced someone to sign for her if they didn't already know she was a complete charlatan.
 
I'm going to get off the couch and move to the armchair for this one...

I think it's not a matter of Brianna being good at hiding the facts from warren here... What we instead have is a willful suspension of disbelief. Why would anyone willingly ignore the truth? I posit that they would if they felt they had something greater to gain.

It's obvious Warren here really believes in what he's doing, pushing the "progressive cause", whatever that means to him. By ignoring how he's being used, abused, and lied to, he gets to play pretend that he's actually fighting in the trenches for the cause. That somehow, he is accepting a lesser evil (that everything that is Brianna is a lie) in order to play campaign manager. He gets to do all the work of trying to push progressive causes, Brianna backs it up by saying whatever he knows others want to hear, and he gets to mess with the incarnate political machine by throwing these constant zingers at them, just hoping or believing that if one doesn't stick it at least made a dent that another toss from someone else in the future will stick in. The benefit of doing this instead of running for meaningful office himself is that there are no consequences. If he loses, he fought the good fight and it reinforces in his mind that things are broken and needs a grass-roots revolt to overcome.

The trouble is I believe that willful suspension of disbelief is going to have real consequences. Who in progressives is going to want to associate with someone whom is the work dog for the manchild with whom they already have chosen not to associate? It's political suicide. What you think is putting yourself in the trenches and fighting the good fight is going to result in the same fate for many of those eager to go off to WW1 who thought the same: you will end the campaign dead in a trench.

You have to understand the difference, Warren, in how we see someone like Brianna versus someone like you. Brianna is hopeless, she has shown her true colours time and time again. We've been documenting them for a long long time... again, it's all available if you only care to break the illusion. We see in you someone not so broken, someone who is actually willing to do the work for a cause they believe in. We aren't asking you all these questions because we're in bed with Stephen Lynch or some evil alt-right nazis or whatever guise you may have originally painted upon us to keep up this illusion. We are simply trying to break through the rose tinted glasses, as we'd much rather see you involved in a real campaign living up to your potential than to be used and tossed away on the latest vanity-trip of John Walker Flynt.
 
I’m questioning Warren’s passion for progressive causes vs his hate boner for Stephen Lynch who is totally not related to him in any way.

Brianna Wu is not a progressive candidate, she is not the savior of Democrats in MA-8. She’s Michelle Bachman of Massachusetts.
 
You should hang out with her IRL, she is pretty nice.
So how often do you meet the Wus in person? And do you get to ride the Porsche?

Anyway, since you seem to be interested in political questions, here's one. Do you know where the Wus' money comes from? The most cutthroat, bleeding edge of "Startup Bro" big-pharma capitalism. How can someone be a reliable advocate for progressive values in healthcare when their paycheck literally depends on the opposite? How is this any different from staffing Treasury with Goldman Sachs alumni? We've seen how well that works out.
If you ever get to set foot in that Porsche, ask yourself if your boss would make a vote that would mean having to give it up.
 
Do you have a similar obsessive file on the times she WAS nice?

Actually, we document everything first, judge second. Literally every tweet and public detail we can scavenge. The thing is.... she's not nice. She's completely self-serving in every regard possible, and lies/appropriates every tragedy she reads about. It's literally a formula now:

  1. Bad thing happens
  2. Wu mentions it (for exposure) but makes it all about her. "This person killed themselves, vote for me!"
  3. Wu invents a several-year long escapade "working" for that cause (be it a suicide hotline worker, an investigative journalist, "As a software engineer....." etc. It doesn't matter because it's all demonstrably false, but there are two sides: People who already know about her and avoid her (or document for others not to be fooled), or those who don't want to see the truth but want to ride her coattails or otherwise be associated with her stamp of approval
  4. Forget about it until it becomes relevant again, and then appropriate suffering more.
So if she ever was nice, if she ever did anything to serve anybody or anything outside herself, it would be documented here. It's not like we exclude anything here to fit a narrative, which I'm sure you must believe to keep up the illusion. It's just the fact is John is a really really bad person and will throw anyone on the barbed wire so she can cross the fence over their bloodied corpse.
 
I keep coming back to what you and the other staffers are being paid. According to the FEC filing, you only received $1000 for your work all quarter (the othe full-time staff you speak of received $0). I see no reimbursement to you for travel expenses to these events which I'll assume are coming out of your own pocket. No meals provided when you're gathering signatures for hours on end. That's well under minimum wage.

Now I understand making sacrifices when things are tight for everyone. But Brianna just bought a Porsche for close to $100k. She just flew out to California to hang out at an Apple promotional event. There certainly appears to be money available to ensure you and the other staffers at least make minimum wage for your efforts.

I guess I don't understand the support for her. She doesn't seem passionate about the causes (causes she recently flipped to when it became politically convenient). She doesn't seem to be interested in working hard for those causes (it's you and Frank at the events and gathering signatures). So I guess my other question is, why aren't you the one running? I'd much rather vote for you since you at least seem to be the real deal when it comes to your beliefs. You seem to be the one willing to stand in the rain gathering signatures. And I bet your staff would be paid fairly before you went out and bought a Porsche.

She doesn't view you as a progressive fighter, she views you as a mark.
 
According to the FEC filing, you only received $1000 for your work all quarter (the othe full-time staff you speak of received $0).
I just want to correct this, Imran Cooper also received $1000 on the Q1 2018 filing. So there are at least 2 paid members, but they make $1000 per quarter.
By comparison, Bernie Sanders endorses a $15/hour minimum wage, which for a full-time 40-hour-a-week job comes out to $2400 per month.
 
I keep coming back to what you and the other staffers are being paid. According to the FEC filing, you only received $1000 for your work all quarter (the othe full-time staff you speak of received $0). I see no reimbursement to you for travel expenses to these events which I'll assume are coming out of your own pocket. No meals provided when you're gathering signatures for hours on end. That's well under minimum wage.

Now I understand making sacrifices when things are tight for everyone. But Brianna just bought a Porsche for close to $100k. She just flew out to California to hang out at an Apple promotional event. There certainly appears to be money available to ensure you and the other staffers at least make minimum wage for your efforts.

I guess I don't understand the support for her. She doesn't seem passionate about the causes (causes she recently flipped to when it became politically convenient). She doesn't seem to be interested in working hard for those causes (it's you and Frank at the events and gathering signatures). So I guess my other question is, why aren't you the one running? I'd much rather vote for you since you at least seem to be the real deal when it comes to your beliefs. You seem to be the one willing to stand in the rain gathering signatures. And I bet your staff would be paid fairly before you went out and bought a Porsche.

She doesn't view you as a progressive fighter, she views you as a mark.
This is also relevant.
For someone who appears to be all about that Berniecrat equality, that's a pretty fucking deep class divide in your relationship with the Wus.
They have the money to pay you, and you on some level know that. People who are scraping for every campaign dollar possible don't buy luxuary cars.

They say the best way to know what a politician would look like in power is to ask the people who already work for them. She claims she'll fight for the poor. How are your bills looking on so little pay?
 
Back
Top Bottom