At first I thought "Wow, this is terrible, an anti-cheat shouldn't brick someone's PC", but then I saw that it bricked the hardware of retards that spent $6000 on hardware specifically made for cheating in online games and I stopped caring, and I don't care about the hypotheticals of "but what if it gets a false positive and bricks the PC of an innocent person!", we don't even know if that can happen, and it won't destroy the PC, it just makes $6000 hardware made for cheating un-usable, so what's the issue exactly? I think it's pretty based, if you read just the headline it sounds bad, once you actually know what happened I don't see why it's controversial.
I just thought of an analogy, imagine you have a guy that has an ASIC crypto miner hardawre plugged to the electric grid illegally, stealing electricity and not paying, the electric company finds out and somehow alters the electricity being used by that ASIC crypto miner, turning it into a brick, and then you have people online saying: "This is horrible! A company should not be able to destroy my electronics!", not the best analogy but you get the idea.