🐱 Twitter Declares The Phrase ‘Learn to Code’ is Abusive Behavior

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
CatParty
https://boundingintocomics.com/2019...vior-after-numerous-journalists-get-laid-off/

Last week, the internet was rocked with the announcements that popular online news outlets Buzzfeed and The Huffington Post would be laying off members of their respective teams. While some believe the layoffs come as the parent companies realize that their traditional models of building a massive audience and attracting digital advertisers are no longer acceptably profitable, others point to a rejection of clickbait headlines and patently false stories by the public as the key reason for falling revenue streams.

Recently, both outlets have come under fire for publishing ‘fake news’: On January 17th, Buzzfeed ran a damning story regarding former Trump attorney Michael Cohen lying to congress about a Trump-tower project in Moscow, only for Special counsel Robert Mueller’s regularly silent office to issue a statement categorically denying the accuracy of the Buzzfeed report. Following the now infamous events of the January 18th anti-abortion event March for Life, The Huffington Postran numerous articles attacking the Covington Catholic High School students for being racist, disrespectful, and bigots, and even in the face of exonerating video evidence, doubled down on their condemnation by continuing to denigrate the students based on their own false narratives.

Following the announcements of these layoffs, a multitude of journalists who had been laid off took to Twitter to announce their unemployment and promote their services. Users across the internet quickly began to respond to these announcements with the phrase ‘Learn to Code.’ This phrase is in reference to the derision and condescension from journalists who advised that coal miners facing the extinction of their livelihood should just accept it and ‘learn to code’ if they truly wanted to remain relevant in the economic landscape.

upload_2019-1-30_8-0-47.png

upload_2019-1-30_8-1-2.png

As more and more journalists were met with ‘learn to code’ in response to their lamentations, some began to grow aggrieved with the phrase:


upload_2019-1-30_8-1-27.png

upload_2019-1-30_8-1-45.png

Some even became convinced that the growing frequency of the use of the phrase was a 4chantrolling campaign, despite provided screenshots only showing that 4chan was celebrating the announcements:
upload_2019-1-30_8-2-10.png

Mere days after journalists took issue with the three word phrase, The Wrap media editor Jon Levine revealed that use of the phrase was soon to be classified as ‘abusive behavior’,
upload_2019-1-30_8-2-34.png

Another user replied to Levine with proof that one of their tweets containing the phrase had violated Twitter rules:
upload_2019-1-30_8-2-57.png

However, within hours Twitter had responded to this development with a spokesperson clarifying the specifics of the policy change to The Daily Beast reporter Max Tani:
upload_2019-1-30_8-3-22.png

Levine also issued an update to his original tweet:
upload_2019-1-30_8-3-44.png

Despite this clarification, many users feel that Twitter’s policy shift is hypocritical at best. Users cite the fact that tweets urging people to ‘fire on any of these red hat b****** when you see them’, comparing the Jewish people to termites, or directing the very same phrase of ‘Learn to Code’ at blue collar workers had no action taken against the tweets or the accounts posting them, while Twitter instantly sought to protect the litany of unemployed journalists against a three word piece of advice by taking direct action.
 
The journalists probably were taking payola from overpriced coding bootcamps for those articles anyway.
 
It just didn't get ejected in the first eliminations, and it was still substantially human driven. That said, AIs writing hundreds of worthless clickbait articles with one author/programmer guiding them may already be happening.
But isn't that what automation does - you substitute human labour for machine labour? The latter has higher up-front costs, but it will pay off with savings from not paying wages. That's what happen since the dawn of the industrial revolution (see point 3), and even before that.
 
Last edited:
on VK you just get censored according to what putins cronies want, as opposed to twitter where it is jack and his cronies
actually doesn't sound too bad tbh

A nice thing about VK is they dont give a fuck about copyrights unless its a russian movie/music. If you know where to look its a piracy paradise.

It just didn't get ejected in the first eliminations, and it was still substantially human driven. That said, AIs writing hundreds of worthless clickbait articles with one author/programmer guiding them may already be happening.

I've come across a bunch of articles that seem to be AI written. Either that or ESL pajeet really doesnt give a fuck.
 
A lot of sports journalism is written by AI, so I don't see why low-quality clickbait couldn't also be automated away eventually.

It's spreading to other things, especially generic news with a local hook, even if there's 1000 cities/towns/places it hook into to it will auto-generate 1000 stories that lead with whatever is closest to the reader.

It also happens with real estate. Sometime last spring a bot "writing" those articles seemed to break in an interesting way and over the course of a day it created a hundred different articles about a local house being sold, enough that it got a thing/section on google news with the "show all coverage" button. With all that extensive coverage and it being referred to as "the house" I thought it could be a legendary murder house or something but nope, just bot rampage.
 
Why does Twitter love sucking the cocks of these bloggers calling themselves journalists?
 
Why does Twitter love sucking the cocks of these bloggers calling themselves journalists?
Because the more "important" people use twitter, the more valuable the platform becomes to investors. However, since importance is subjective, twitter does its best to make unimportant people seem important by protecting them.
 
Because the more "important" people use twitter, the more valuable the platform becomes to investors. However, since importance is subjective, twitter does its best to make unimportant people seem important by protecting them.
Considering Jack doesn't give a shit about his investors by putting his political agenda as a top priority, it's just that he wants an echo chamber.
 
Literally all I would need to do is give an accurate accounting of events from both sides and I'd automatically be within the top 10% of journalists. Would love to watch one of these super speshul mongoloids try and learn to use Python or C++. It'd be like watching a chimp try to grasp algebra.
reminder people have had shitfits over computing words like "parent" "child" "slave" "dongle"
 
“Learn to code” is the modern-day “let them eat cake”.
A prickish thing to say, but by no means abuse.
 
I'm offended by mayonnaise it triggers me. Let's try to banned it on Twitter, nobody can say mayonnaise anymore.
Miracle Whip is literally my Vietnam gaiz! The sad thing is, guaranteed someone has blogged about how ketchup or mayonnaise or something triggers them because it reminds them of their dad, or their rape, or that time they were told to learn to code.
 
Learn to meme?
DyMWCEeU0AA60gF.png

archive
“We got our cock rests at Twitter to ban the phrase but we totally aren’t butthurt, the people posting it are just using it to camouflage LiTeRaL DeAtH ThReAtS.”
Is journalism filled with people who discovered the internet last week?
 
Back
Top Bottom