Or you're just lazy and honestly don't give a damn about accuracy.
Look, let's clarify something about the "accuracy" of the CWCki. First, none of the primary sources are made up. All of his emails, Facebook posts, phone logs, and art is carefully sourced. The CWCki is full of footnotes. This is a good thing because from day one people have been telling lies about Chris and making parody accounts. If you come on the Farms and say, "I saw Chris take off all his clothes at the Wal-Mart yesterday," it's not getting on the CWCki unless you've got the pics or if your reliablility is established. So in one sense, the CWCki is an extremely accurate (if incomplete) compendium of the raw materials of Chris's life.
At the same time, these primary sources have been interpreted by the authors of the CWCki. This is the right and indeed the duty of all historians, to evaluate and contextualize the data. The big difference between the CWCki and, say, Wikipedia, is that it tries to be funny and satirical. There are places where it exaggerates the significance of certain facts in order to bait and criticize Chris, but this has been the tone of the CWCki since its inception, as it grew out of Encyclopedia Dramatica, another satire site. So the editors of the CWCki aren't "lazy," they're stretching the truth intentionally as a stylistic and editorial choice.
Now if you pay attention, you can read between the lines and easily see where the truth is being stretched. Since the primary sources are all there, you are free to make your own judgment about the "real" Chris. At its core, the CWCki is rigidly accurate, but around the edges, it plays with the truth to deliver a critique that Chris richly deserves.
. Chris joining or starting his own wiccan coven would be even better, as they are full of LBGTQ people trying to get in touch with the goddess.
