- Joined
- Aug 30, 2015
What do you mean. TV Tropes has a page on Transgender kids and Drag queen kids?
I mean Some Anvils Need to be Dropped pages
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What do you mean. TV Tropes has a page on Transgender kids and Drag queen kids?
Oh I am aware about those. It's usully the same stupid bullshit you hear from CNN.I mean Some Anvils Need to be Dropped pages
The Cracked page is bad about this. It’s nothing but Social Justice bullshit asserting that it’s fine that the supposed comedy site is doing nothing but idiotic politics because what they’re saying is so important.I mean Some Anvils Need to be Dropped pages
You can't be a comedy site and still try to be serious with politics especially sjw politicsThe Cracked page is bad about this. It’s nothing but Social Justice bullshit asserting that it’s fine that the supposed comedy site is doing nothing but idiotic politics because what they’re saying is so important.
The Cracked page is bad about this. It’s nothing but Social Justice bullshit asserting that it’s fine that the supposed comedy site is doing nothing but idiotic politics because what they’re saying is so important.
The site that consently tries to push My Little Pony on every page, including fanfic. Also tries so hard to be political serious at the same time.Tropers are so gullible I'm surprised troper deaths aren't more of a common occurence.
Oh i have.You should see the works that have a whole page dedicated to them
It's amazing how Vladi went from being the Biggest Chad Ever to being hated when he started opposing Western Liberalism. Guy's a bastard, sure, but Russia's government has always been built on authoritarian bastards who can keep the nobles from killing each other.The most important lesson ever taught to me by Cracked was its sudden and flagrant flip flop from shilling Vladimir Putin to calling him the devil.
Russia's history has always been like that. Also the guy is one of the tameist compare to some of the Russian leaders in the past. So he may be a bastard, but he isn't the worst bastard in Russia history.It's amazing how Vladi went from being the Biggest Chad Ever to being hated when he started opposing Western Liberalism. Guy's a bastard, sure, but Russia's government has always been built on authoritarian bastards who can keep the nobles from killing each other.
About the only major Tsar I can think of that was potentially fairer than Putin was Alexander II, and he still ended up being murdered by communists for still not doing enough in their eyes. As said, large and diverse countries like Russia need strongmen to unify the tribes and nobles to keep the system running in any major way.Russia's history has always been like that. Also the guy is one of the tamest compared to some of the Russian leaders in the past. So he may be a bastard, but he isn't the worst bastard in Russian history.
Most of the west seems to forget how Russia history is. So the fact they think they could put a none authoriarn in power and it will go smoothly. Shows that most people really don't pay attention to history. They tried doing that in the 90s and just didn't work out for them. So that's way Putin got in the first place.About the only major Tsar I can think of that was potentially fairer than Putin was Alexander II, and he still ended up being murdered by communists for still not doing enough in their eyes. As said, large and diverse countries like Russia need strongmen to unify the tribes and nobles to keep the system running in any major way.
About the only major Tsar I can think of that was potentially fairer than Putin was Alexander II, and he still ended up being murdered by communists for still not doing enough in their eyes. As said, large and diverse countries like Russia need strongmen to unify the tribes and nobles to keep the system running in any major way.
The faction that killed Alexander had their stated goal to be socialist, and virtually all anarchist movements were based on imposing communist rule after overthrowing the government. The two were virtually indistinguishable before Lenin showed the true face of a communist society.What communists? He was murdered by anarchists.
The faction that killed Alexander had their stated goal to be socialist, and virtually all anarchist movements were based on imposing communist rule after overthrowing the government. The two were virtually indistinguishable before Lenin showed the true face of a communist society.
They advocated for the consolidation of serf lands into agricultural communes, mirroring the policy the Bolsheviks ended up putting in place with Collectivization. That's communism no matter how you slice it, even though they were originally in the camp with Bakunin. I guess this is a tangent though.That being my point. Socialism does not necessarily equal communism, especially in the 19th century. They were anarchists, but they were not communists. Those came later.
That being my point. Socialism does not necessarily equal communism, especially in the 19th century. They were anarchists, but they were not communists. Those came later.
We're talking about the bombing of Alexander II, not the execution of the Romanov family.Isn't the prevailing view that Lenin personally ordered the killings?
We're talking about the bombing of Alexander II, not the execution of the Romanov family.