Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You keep saying that as if it’s gospel. Clearly the police and prosecutors office disagree. Presumably this question will be decided by the courts when they hear your case.The issue is under Illinois law that the image in question isn't child pornography.
The police and prosecutors in Christian County aren't the brightest bunch. Of course, the question will be answered in the court just as it has already been answered in Ilinois court of appeals.You keep saying that as if it’s gospel. Clearly the police and prosecutors office disagree. Presumably this question will be decided by the courts when they hear your case.
The police and prosecutors in Christian County aren't the brightest bunch. Of course, the question will be answered in the court just as it has already been answered in Ilinois court of appeals.
it's always that way...It's impossible how stupid you are. Fucking hell.
Like I said the Illinois court of Appeal have already ruled on the issue, regarding the issue I stated regarding the image and child porn. The state BTW appealed the appeals court decision to the Illinois Supreme Court which denied their appeal.I am sure they are infinitely more intelligent than you are.
You keep saying that as if it’s gospel. Clearly the police and prosecutors office disagree. Presumably this question will be decided by the courts when they hear your case.
Like I said the Illinois court of Appeal have already ruled on the issue, regarding the issue I stated regarding the image and child porn.
I KNOW BECAUSE THEY TOLD ME IN FUCKING COURT WHAT IT WAS....THEY ARE REQUIRED TO. There has been NO experts called your talking out your fucking ass.Remember, he claims to have never seen the photo but knows every single detail about it. And experts from the FBI and the State of Illinois have determined it is child porn. The judge and District Attorney also believe it's child porn. His own lawyer could have challenged both the search warrant and if the image was actual child porn in his very first hearing but hasn't. And she hasn't in a dozen other hearings also. But yet, we are supposed to believe Toad.
Toad keeps repeating something about a test but what he doesn't tell you is only SOME of those criteria have to be met, not all of them.
And that's why Toad won't show all the discovery because he knows they got a lot of evidence including circumstantial against him. And with his history of lying repeatingly, we of course only have "his word" which has zero merit.
(space reserved for Toad to do another endless cut and paste on things he doesn't understand)
They have made no such decision in your case.
I KNOW BECAUSE THEY TOLD ME IN FUCKING COURT WHAT IT WAS....THEY ARE REQUIRED TO. There has been NO experts called your talking out your fucking ass.
it is true only SOME have to be meet...but they are only basing it on only ONE and the Illinois appeal court has stated ONE is not enough.
You know what, you all have your fun, I'm done.
My point is and this will probably be my finally post. A LOT of people are watching this site, more then you think...so keep playing your little game.
One final note then I'm pretty much done with this place.
Well I'm done with you lot,
Does that mean you'll do the right thing and kill yourself?You know what, you all have your fun, I'm done.
This is the profile picture Toad had up when he threatened his police chief. Next time Toad, put it in your mouth and pull
View attachment 5385717
No it wasn't you fucking LIAR! HERE THE ACTUALLY POST
View attachment 5385741
I was threatening to sue, that's why dismissed.
So how long before they throw him in prison anyways? Surely his trial has to be coming up and it's basically confirmed he had real kiddie porn.He's visiting this forum every 10 to 20 minutes. Just click on his profile and you'll see.
He is addicted to Kiwifarms and despite his many promises to go away, he never will.
We own him..
View attachment 5466735