I genuinely don't know if you understand what that fucking means. Wiped clean means NO FUCKING STORY PRIOR TO CRISIS STILL EXISTED IN CONTINUITY!
Oh, now I get it, you're literally autistic. So sorry, let's get back to the topic. Crisis on Infinite Earths wiped
most of the pre-Crisis DCU clean. Just like the New 52. Which is what my original point was, which you are still dodging with the rest of your screeching nonsense, which I'll get to.
I explained the purpose and intention of that.
Yes. To make Superman the sole kryptonian. Which is among the many things I listed as DC TRYING TO WIPE OUT OLDER SHIT. Which you repeatedly seemed to not understand, which makes talking to you like trying to speak to a brick wall.
So your just a fucking moron?
Coming from you, Mr. I Can't Do Reading Comprehension, that's hilarious.
New Krypton appeared and got blowed up. The end. It was a fucking disaster and the fact you describe washed up James Robinson and hack Greg Rucka's meaningless story that changed nothing and was going nowhere as some of the best speaks volumes?
It appeared, had great ideas and yes, good stories BEFORE DC shat the bed at the very end. Yes. I stated that in that very comment but your REEE-blinders are preventing you from seeing that apparently.
Have you read John Byrne? Dan Jurgens? God Damn Joe Kelly?
You had a whole world of Superman writers to pick from and those were your picks? Jesus. And yes, I have read them. John Byrne is an especially hilarious example because DC spent most of the subsequent decades walking back many of his changes.
How? When Denny O'Neil who was in charge of the Bat titles at the time has stated he didn't consider the CIOCE as a complete reboot changing things and he was editing the damn book!
Who gives a fuck what Denny O'Neil said when I'm analyzing what actually happened? COIE changed a shitload of things just like the New 52. A point of mine which you repeatedly seem to be dodging.
And there we have it. Your agenda. You liked some of the Nu52.
What fucking agenda, autist? This is exactly what I'm saying, you read "New 52 wasn't the sole mass-change reboot DC ever did, Crisis on Infinite Earths was another example" and you saw "New 52 was actually good, nerds" and went REEEEEE.
But whatever. You failed to make your point. You stated, 'b-but there da same' then dropped in the REEE to insult me because you don't have substance.
I made only one, sole, basic point which is so uncontroversial even a child would get it but you repeatedly misunderstand it whether through inability or just a plain refusal because in your brain that is somehow tantamount to admitting "New 52 GREAT".
I actually think some good work came out of the Nu52. Bully/Superman was shit. But Azzerallo and Chiang did a great turn on Wonder Woman. Lemire and Sorrentino did a good Green Arrow run.
Uh, good for you? Not really relevant to the point I was making but whatever. The only reason I brought up Superman and Barda vs. Morrison is because you tried to argue the absolutely inane point that post-COIE was nothing but successes while New 52 was nothing but failures and that somehow means that COIE wasn't also a massive reboot like New 52.
But was erasing everything necessary? The destruction of the Nu52 was disproportionate to the okay runs; most of which could have been done without irrevocably shattering the oldest imprint in comics. And it did that. It nuked Detective and Action. It caused irreparable damage to the brand and told you those comics you collected? They were worthless.
New 52 didn't erase absolutely everything just like COIE left some shit intact. The fact that you are trying to argue that DC relabeling Detective and Action with #1 as if that actually fucking changed any of the stories that happened (in Detective's case as with Batman overall, it changed zero) as some grand erasure is very telling. New 52 didn't render everything you collected worthless anymore than COIE erasing a shitton of pre-Crisis stories meant that everything you collected was now worthless.
CIOCE didn't erase things, it destroyed what happened in every other earth but the prime one, tweaking here and replacing characters that were broken.
"Yes COIE destroyed the entire multiverse, rebooted a bunch of characters and massively changed others but it was nothing like the New 52!"
I'd find this adorable if it weren't so sad.
Like half? really? That's...kindof ridiculous. Flash even more so. What exactly did they erase from the Flash except for the multiverse aspect? Do you even know?
You mean aside from Jay Garrick getting wiped from existence and Barry Allen's history being retconned?
You just make baseless claims, insult me, then fail to respond. Why are you reaching so fucking hard with this? Oh, you liked the Nu52....
Bruh, you sperged out first. I repeatedly told you what point I was trying to make but you are like a blind bull who imagined red. I don't give a shit about the New 52 or Crisis on Infinite Earths, both of those are in the past, so you can quit trying to play "gotcha" with me which is just making you look like a tard.
There you go. So desperate to drag post CIOCE DC down, elevate Nu52 up. You fucking attack John Byrne Superman.
I told you several paragraphs above what point I was trying to make there, which you missed yet again.
Morrison wrote a year and a half of bully Superman in jeans hanging a man off of a balcony and wanting the Justice League to be more socially conscious. His shit interpretation was rejected after five years.
He wrote 19 issues of what is widely considered some of the best Superman stories of the modern era. The fact that you have such a knee-jerk reaction to Morrison
lightly referencing Superman's Golden Age past (you'd probably have an aneurysm reading actual Golden Age Superman stories judging by your reaction to this) is telling.
John Byrne wrote classic stories such as Action 600, explaining why WW and Superman don't work as a couple
Jesus Christ, for someone that simps for Byrne so hard you sure do pick some of his most mediocre stories as "classics". I'm also starting to get an idea of WHY you hate New 52 so much that you can't even admit to the most basic points about it, which honestly makes you look even more like a sperg.
Superman 2, which redefined Lex Luther as a villain
Yes, it turned him into a generic business bad man. Which DC ended up walking back by beginning to reincorporate Lex's mad scientist characterization after less than a decade. And don't give me that shit that "Byrne invented Lexcorp", he did not. Still a fun story though.
and Superman 18, which is a beautiful meditation on why Superman is more than a mean alien with powers beating up on normal people.
It's a story about Superman witnessing what would happen if kryptonians had migrated to Earth to escape Krypton's destruction, which Byrne answers with "they become Nazis and enslave humans" because Byrne had an obsession with making Krypton to be the worst fucking hellhole in the universe. It's not a meditation on anything except Byrne unintentionally writing what is an amusing anti-immigrant screed that would fit perfect in today's modern climate.
You know what actually is a "beautiful meditation on why Superman is MORE than a mean alien with powers beating up on normal people"? FUCKING ACTION COMICS BY MORRISON.
You've more or less exposed yourself.
Yes, you have. As a complete sperg. Congratulations.