- Joined
- Oct 28, 2017
Correction: They banned Super Seducer 1 & 2 itself, not the developer. Which is unsurprising; that game got banned practically everywhere and was a lightning rod for controversy.They've banned the developer of Super Seducer from publishing on their platform. Considering the state of the e-shop their policy is to just have no oversight when it comes to having upkeep. More or less it's not an ideological stance but the moment something brings them bad press they'll get rid of the offending games quickly.
No that is not Sony's policy. It isn't even Steam's official policy. Sony has gone after any and every game with sexual content that has originated out of Japan. The girl's age, real or apparent, has never been stated, officially or unofficially to factor into the decision making at all for Sony. Steam's policy has changed and shifted multiple times, to the point that, now, Steam pretty much allows completely uncensored games on its platform, while rejecting others. The problem with Steam is how vague and ever shifting their guidelines are, and how this has left their storefront a right mess and a half. In any case, Steam is nowhere near as draconian as Sony, and many games released censored on Sony platforms get released uncensored on Steam. And no, VNs are not treated with suspicion because they are regarded as "shovelware". If Steam or Sony gave a shit about shovelware, they wouldn't let half the shit on their storefronts sell there, especially Steam, which is chockfull of Unity asset flip garbage.Sony's policy is more or less related to underage girls or girls that appear underage, it's the same as Steam's. They're both on par with each other on what they target. Steam got rid of Evenicle 2 because of what was featured in there, and Evenicle is something that had actual gameplay. VNs in general are treated with suspicion across the board due to them being heavily regarded as shovelware.
Last edited: