- Joined
- Apr 19, 2019
Well like I said, I had one since launch. That was also a very long generation of consoles before the new ones were on the horizon, so say it was 6-7 of ass and the last 3-4 years it finally got it's act into gear. The generation was arguably about two console lifespans so your view on the PS3 could be different depending on when you jumped in.For someone defending current Sony exclusives, this sounds weird. The gameplay was pretty on par with what was standard for that era of gaming as I am sure we could say about current Sony moviegames.
As for Resistance and Killzone, I'll give you that their sequels didn't reach the same level but they were still successful enough to warrant 2 sequels each. If we're talking about successes then you have to take them as they come because we are talking on a general sense on how the PS3 did compared to other PS.
GOW Ascension was poorly received and did like shit, sure. But it was also released right around the time that people were sick and done with PS3 and ready for PS4. That doesn't make the fact that GOW3 did extremely well irrelevant.
What I am trying to say if that you can feel like PS3 sucked hard, but it truly did not. How can you say it sucked when it OVERTOOK THE 360 by the end of the gen. By that metric we'd have to say that the 360 sucked.
On God of War I think Ascension proved just how much a revamp of the series was needed. The Old style of gameplay just didn't seem to cut it, that's kind of what I meant with mentioning how GOW3 had a bit of falloff. People got tired of the gameplay, there just wasn't enough stuff there to keep people interested for the original games. You had titles like Dark Souls come out during that time and that gave people a more in-depth action RPG. God of War's action segments seemed to pale in comparison to that. It was no wonder they took some inspiration from the Souls series for the revamp.
