Something Awful and Friends - The roller-coaster train-wreck embarrassing downfall of a Web 1.0 giant and its tick offspring like from Cloverfield

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I'm not logging into my SA account to check, but are there any cool posts from goons basically cheering for corona-chan since it will kill all the evil boomer landlords/doctors that refuse them gender pills?

A quick browse reveals that they're taking it a bit personally. Very personally, in fact. Hi, Edgar Allen Ho! Good to see you again.

1584584060653.png


Others seem more upset that it's infecting a group of people a majority of whom, by a small percentage, think the "correct" way, rather than the group of people a majority of whom, by a small percentage, think the "incorrect" way.

1584584174636.png


This fellow might not even have a license to post updates from northern Italy. Shame on him for alarming everyone!

1584584299728.png


Others are more excited for the possibility that a new, global healthcare system might arise from the ashes of humanity. Not just socialized. Global. How's it gonna work? Who cares.

1584584582315.png
 
I do love Edgar's absolute blindness at whining about people not abiding by quarantine standards.

Did he literally just admit that he's a selfish fuckwit who caught coronavirus by going out to a restaurant in the middle of an epidemic like a moron, consuming numerous alcoholic beverages, further weakening his immune system, and is now gloating that he murdered his family?
 
Hmm, I might have to eat my hat a little on re-reading that. I think he might be describing the actions of the one with Wu flu, not his own.
 
Hmm, I might have to eat my hat a little on re-reading that. I think he might be describing the actions of the one with Wu flu, not his own.

He should learn to write in English then or have his avatar forcibly confiscated, because if that's what he was saying, it wouldn't have been possible to write it more incoherently and ass backwards.
 
It sounds like he's saying that his mom was in the restaurant for at least two hours (how else would she know the guy was there for at least two hours and what he was doing). But how would she know that this random guy she saw in the bar would later be the one announced to have the virus? Makes no sense. Sounds like shitthatdidnthappen.txt
 
It sounds like he's saying that his mom was in the restaurant for at least two hours (how else would she know the guy was there for at least two hours and what he was doing). But how would she know that this random guy she saw in the bar would later be the one announced to have the virus? Makes no sense. Sounds like shitthatdidnthappen.txt

I think you guys are tarded. Maybe the news reported on the town's first case? Word of mouth? Who fuckin knows.

IMO he is not saying him or his family was at the margarita place, but he is concluding his family is going to die because this moron brought the rona to his town in a reckless manner.
 
Probably imploded in (g/tr)oon drama. Like every SA offsite ever. Without "wrongthinkers" like on SA they started eating each other.

I like how that Poe guy writes that his entire family is basically dead at this point. That's primo goon sadbrain thinking. Can't wait for the first goon suicides as to not have to face corona-chan.
 
A quick browse reveals that they're taking it a bit personally. Very personally, in fact. Hi, Edgar Allen Ho! Good to see you again.

View attachment 1194127

My mother has been reading a lot of local news stories about people being diagnosed with it, so I recognize this one. This is probably the city of Lubbock he's talking about. The case was an architecture student at Texas Tech University who had been studying abroad in Italy. First thing she did when she got home was go to Rosa's, a mexican food place, on 4th St. and Quaker Avenue. Later, she would test positive for the coronavirus.

So the architecture student has murdered everyone in Lubbock.
 
re: Shit about how an internet community should be run, autocracies, etc.

Personally, I think it's a bit of a mistake to draw any comparisons at all between internet moderators and national governments. The purpose of governance is different, the stakes are different, the mechanics of human interaction are different, the general hostility level of everybody involved is different. Governments exist (in their ideal form) to keep society productive and peaceful while removing genuinely bad people from society on a strictly case-by-case basis; internet moderators exist (in almost every case) to cultivate their community's image by immediately removing anybody who causes any disruption. You can't run an internet forum like you run a country, because an internet forum is not a fucking country.

It's a difficult discussion to have, because the internet and the way people use it has changed so much even in just the past decade. I'll start by talking about 2000s-era internet. Everything about onlining in the aughts can be summarized by a single meme that was very popular during those years:

View attachment 1187913

The old internet was known by every user to be a den of misinformation, faggotry, and the rotating wireframe skull gif. There were no girls on the internet. Nothing was meant to be taken seriously. Anonymity was strongly encouraged and very often enforced. People would DoS each other and each other's websites as a prank rather than as an actual attack. Shitposting was a universal pastime. The "e/n" thread tag was created on Something Awful to denote a matter that was of every importance to the OP and of no importance to anybody else on the internet. Y'know, serious real-life business, like teenage relationship drama. Whenever people asked the internet for advice on these life-or-death matters, the discussion went like this:
  • OP: "Help my girlfriend isn't answering my calls this morning and I've tried a dozen times so she definitely knows it's important, what should I do?????"
    • Replies: "Kill her, then yourself"
  • OP: "My best friend molested me and he's fucking my 15 year old sister right now, what should I do?????"
    • Replies: "Kill them, then yourself"
  • OP: "My mom walked in on me right as I climaxed and I think I tagged her face and now she's gone to her room and I can hear her crying, what should I do?????"
    • Replies: "Kill her, then yourself, but leave the front door unlocked so I can come bang her one last time"
  • OP: "I'm trying to weigh the stopping power of these two different lines of black-market flechette shells against the risk of damaging my shotgun's choke tube next time I have to go out and scare off the puckin thieves, any advice?????"
    • Replies: "Kill them, then yourse-- holy shit he actually did it"
On the old internet, it wasn't a coincidence that Something Awful was run by a mercurial screaming asshole. It was expected. It made sense. If you wanted fairness or transparency or accountability, you were encouraged to try going outside for a change.

There were no actual communities on the old internet -- or at least, no neurotypical ones. The old internet was a stupid toy that you played with when you were alone in your dorm room and wanted to be an anonymous asshole to other anonymous assholes with no real-life consequences to yourself or to anybody else. iexplore.exe was a big dumb video game like every other program on your computer. There were people who lived on the internet and took it completely seriously -- such as furries, hackers, and conspiracy theorists -- but we either ignored those people or trolled the shit out of them at every chance.

That was the old internet. If you went back in time to the mid-2000s and told any of us how incredibly gay the internet was going to become in 15 years, none of us would have believed you. This the new internet:

View attachment 1188051

The people who live on the internet are still complete fuckups, but there are more of them. They've also developed some shared cultural norms and beliefs that have fucked them up even further:
  • Contrary to external appearance they are not spoiled white manchildren; they are oppressed minorities and the entire world is against them.
  • They live on the internet because the "Outside" is racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, ableist, capitalist and fascist, and the internet is the only place where they can have a safe space. Telling a minority to go outside is denial of their oppression; banning a minority is literal murder.
  • As oppressed minorities, they have a right and a duty to fight back using any means that they happen to come up with. Oppressive person. Fair game. May be tricked, sued, lied to, or destroyed.
  • Questioning any of the above is oppression and bigotry.
Also, you're not allowed to laugh at them anymore because their friends and sympathizers work for the megacorporations that run huge swaths of the internet.

There are still no girls on the internet; you're just not allowed to say so anymore. Anything you post is at risk of being glued to your forehead for eternity both on the internet and in real life, whether or not you think you're posting anonymously. Oversharing is not simply encouraged; in many communities it is a requirement before anybody will listen to you. Posting about somebody else, whether in the same internet community or in another, is violence and thus warrants a violent response. Every shitposter plies his craft under the sword of Damocles, ever in fear of that inevitable moment when the horsehair snaps and that particular social network's "Trust and Safety Team" silently descends -- always final in its judgment, with no prior warning or notice given whatsoever.

On the new internet, it's no wonder that people -- specifically, those people who spend their every waking hour on the internet -- demand a different kind of leader than the kind that thrived on the old internet. The internet isn't where they have fun like normal people did back in the olden days; the internet is where they exist. So they need their rulers to be fair, transparent, and accountable. Most importantly -- and most fatally, since they're literally fucking insane -- they need to feel like they're safe, loved, and in control.

And I just don't feel like there's any real-world governmental model that works for that. None that hasn't ended in horror, anyway.
Now that you talk about the psychology of internet-dwellers, a subject I happen to find extremely interesting, I reckon the Early Internet was alike the Wild West, people used to spam Child Porn (before it was illegal) just for shits and giggles, but that is to be expected, as most new things, especially those with a high risk-reward ratio such as internet, tend to attract people with anti-social features, because people with psychopathic and apathic/uncaring features are very risk tolerant.
The Internet provides emotional detachment to the people that use it, in a similar manner how a car provides emotional detachment.
But just like emotional detachment makes it easier for semingly normal people to behave like smug psychos it also makes them more likely to get extremely angry for no particular reason, as emotional detachment let's them and their whims alone, thus Road Rage is a quite common thing, it's not coincidence that psychopaths and people with Anti-Social Personality Disorder tend to be very impulsive and emotionally unstable.
I know this is a controversial thing to say: but human empathy has its limits, I don't remember the exact number, but we as humans are only able to empathise with a maximum of around 100 people according to sociologists and psychologists, and we tend to see collectives and groups as abstractions, as stereotypes or mental constructs of them, so to speak.
There's no point in trying to deny that there's certain element of Sadism in Folk's Justice, people often want to see rival collectives or criminals suffer, "that'd teach them", "they had it coming", "they deserve it"... this is important because you said the following:
The old internet was a stupid toy that you played with when you were alone in your dorm room and wanted to be an anonymous asshole to other anonymous assholes with no real-life consequences to yourself or to anybody else. iexplore.exe was a big dumb video game like every other program on your computer. There were people who lived on the internet and took it completely seriously -- such as furries, hackers, and conspiracy theorists -- but we either ignored those people or trolled the shit out of them at every chance.
This is extremely interesting, are you saying that you thought your actions had no negative consequences and if people taken them as serious things it's their fault anyway? Don't misunderstand me, I think script kiddies, furfags and conspiracy nuts are pathetic retards, but it's also a fact that unrepentant abusers, criminals, bullies and so on tend to rationalise their behaviour to the point they end up believing their own lies and excuses in a similar manner how Narcissists and Psychopaths do, this type of backwards and fowards rationalization is called "Superoptimism" in Psychopathology, there's an extremely interesting article about it in Psychology Today:
 
he's describing the details of the , who happened to get sick at his moms favorite restaurant, so now its going to kill the goons family because his mom is still going out to eat

None of this makes any sense at all. If she's eating out in restaurants full of disease vectors, she's the idiot. His whole family is idiots. He's an idiot.
 
SA is chock a block with big brain goons posting about how they were wandering around in public and were aghast at the hordes of selfish right wing morons wandering around in public. As if self-righteous faggotry grants them antiviral qualities.
 
Back
Top Bottom