Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Henry Bemis said:
SJWs would still find a way to undermine poverty assistance. From the blog Stuff White People Like:
Click to expand...
I guess poor white people don't exist. No wonder I feel so invisible all the time. I'm a figment of my own imagination.

Edit: I call bullshit on the Wal*Mart closing down in 2 weeks. The only time I've ever seen a Wal*Mart close was when they would shut down a plain one once the new Supercenter was up and running.
 
Last edited:
Organic Fapcup said:
Okay, that's enough shitposting. Here's a real korean getting called out on cultural appropriation... for knowing korean.

pFRrrOb.png


G8QQewt.png
Click to expand...

What is it with these tumblr people and their love of the words " procastination" and the :I face?
they always like doing the :I face that it pisses me off.
 
I don't know if this had ever been posted in the previous thread but here's a chart tackling the most dire and critical issue in all of queer rights: CISSEXIST TRANSFORMERS FANFICTION!
BMS5KrQ.jpg

*barfs*
 
Last edited by a moderator:
"Treating people of different genders like they're all exactly the same is... quite frankly, offensive."

Treating people the same, regardless of their gender... I was under the impression that this was known as equality. I thought equal treatment was supposed to be the whole point of the SJW cause? Of course, here I am trying to assign rationality to all this.
 
The Mountain said:
"Treating people of different genders like they're all exactly the same is... quite frankly, offensive."

Treating people the same, regardless of their gender... I was under the impression that this was known as equality. I thought equal treatment was supposed to be the whole point of the SJW cause? Of course, here I am trying to assign rationality to all this.
Click to expand...

SJWs don't want equality. They want special treatment.
 
Because poverty always seems to pop up when talking about SJWs, I just wanted to say: there are some SJWs out there who genuinely are poor (and not in the 'struggling college student from upper middle class family' way). They're a lot rarer than the other type, but I have encountered them. It's just that, you know, because they're SJWs, their actual real life experience doesn't make them any more reasonable.

I used to be on a forum that had several of that type of people. They definitely were more sane than SJWs as a whole, but they still had this attitude that says that being hypersensitive and irrational means you're ~*~BRAVE~*~. They would always do things like ignore the trigger warnings posted on threads and read them anyway, then become enraged with everyone else when they were triggered. (And I do think they had legitimate PTSD. But, seriously, if they couldn't be bothered to keep away from things they knew were harmful to them, I don't really have all that much sympathy about their being triggered.)

They also all ignored other people who had been through the same experiences as them just as much as Rich White Kid Tumblrite SJWs do. Another rape survivor has a different opinion than you on how to prevent rape? THEY SUCK AND ARE WRONG AND ARE JUST TRYING TO TRIGGER YOU. Another person who grew up in poverty has a different opinion on what causes poverty? FUCK HER, HER EXPERIENCES DON'T MATTER. Sometimes it got really ridiculous. One girl was furiously angry because someone dared to disagree with her favorite author (about a totally non-triggering topic), flew into a rage, and accused the other person of "being a special snowflake" for daring to have an opinion.

I feel like what they had in common with rich college kid SJWs is that they're both groups of people who are kind of disconnected from "normal" life and have this desperate need to feel important and powerful.
 
I don't want to cause a ruckus, but this reminds me of a situation I paid witness to at a sporking blog. [People take books/fic and make fun of it.]

Basically, some dumb Pokémon fic which tried to teach people how to write Pokémon fic and did a terrible job of it was being sporked. One of the chapters was about how you shouldn't use any random tree names for Professors, because Oak, Elm and Birch were one specific tree type and if you used the most generic name ever you were doing it wrong. The fic took this moment to criticize Professor Ivy due to her name.

Then things went downhill when someone who already disapproved of the spork then declared the whole thing moot because the sporker defended Professor Ivy. Which would be one thing, except...
  1. the person didn't immediately explain their issue with the situation, so people started asking among themselves what could've caused it, and someone suggested it was the character's appearance - Professor Ivy is a rather sexualized character;
  2. the person declared that was untrue and that their issue was with the name, but didn't make a point very easily - that is, people were saying they didn't get why the name was so offensive compared to the body;
  3. instead of crafting a new explanation, the person accused the other posters of trying to enforce their own viewpoints on her and accused them of appropriating feminism - as if she wasn't allowed to be angry however she wanted - while the general community reaction was 'hey what's exactly so offensive about this, could you explain it?';
  4. she also declared Professor Juniper to be a sexist character, who was weak and lesser in the story compared to Cedric Juniper and was 'prevented from joining the story' thanks to 'her ovaries';
  5. while on another blog, she posted links to her 'main opponent's' FF.n profile and used them as evidence that their opinion was meaningless.

...so, yeah. The spork was shut down and stuff happened after that that doesn't matter. Looking at some of the posts here just reminded me of this. [And much as it's less-feminism-sperging now, I think actual incidents of heavy stuff should be considered rather than just yelling at random idiots.]
 
Organic Fapcup said:
Okay, that's enough shitposting. Here's a real korean getting called out on cultural appropriation... for knowing korean.

pFRrrOb.png


G8QQewt.png
Click to expand...
You fail social justice forever. Report immediately to the nearest privilege checker for your mandatory bleach ingestion.
 
WWWWolf said:
Fun fact: there's nothing wrong with social justice. Just social justice warrioring.

My advice is always the same: if anyone really wants to learn about sociopolitical issues, they should - oh - maybe look at actual literature, scientific publications, or actually take observations on how people are doing and behaving. Getting your information from the echo chamber and nodding along is not productive.

Tumblr SJWs are essentially doing the same thing the conspiracy theorists are doing - "don't trust what THE GOVERNMENT and THE MEDIA is telling you, the REAL TRUTH can be found in shitty blogs and blurry YouTube videos". And we all know how that is working for them.
Click to expand...

Precisely. One of my friends is a rape crisis counselor and victim advocate. She comprises 50% of the advocacy resources for her whole state. I've learned quite a bit from her because she's is right in the middle of things and often has laser-like insight into these sorts of issues. She also is open-minded, and willing to entertain various points of view, and loves open discourse and respectful exchange of ideas.

SJWs would hate her, because she advocates for respect and understanding, first and foremost. Not just screaming at people because they didn't use your preferred obscure made-up pronoun to describe the non-existent gender that you just pulled out of your ass. She's not part of the echo chamber. But she's done more to educate me on the stupid bullshit that marginalized groups have to go through than the most strident SJW. And made me want to do more to help.

You want to help, Tumblr SJWs? Grab a ladle.
 
WWWWolf said:
Fun fact: there's nothing wrong with social justice. Just social justice warrioring.

My advice is always the same: if anyone really wants to learn about sociopolitical issues, they should - oh - maybe look at actual literature, scientific publications, or actually take observations on how people are doing and behaving. Getting your information from the echo chamber and nodding along is not productive.
Click to expand...
Oho, you silly cis male scum, that would require doing actual research and putting in effort. No, I'll just stay up here on my high horse and instantly believe anything the internet tells me while making random assumption and treat them as fact, like calling you cis male scum without knowing your gender, sexual preference, ect.

On a more random note. "cis" is also the name of a security company.
 
Jon-Nyan said:
tumblr_n8kvhylOqB1ryeto5o1_1280.png

"I cannot find an alternate explanation" I can. Mental illness.
Click to expand...

Srsly, tho, so many things wrong with this from a lore perspective, let alone logic. Angels are immortal celestial beings, servants of the Elohim, and they are fucking scary. He cannot have been an angel in his previous life because they don't fucking die. They fall. And become demons. They're known to take human form from time to time, but they generally don't stay very long, and they also don't forget that they are angels.

And you are fucking right. The alternate explanation he's looking for that is less complex and still covers the facts is mental illness. He's looking for mental illness.
 
I'm about to move to one of the major strongholds of Social Justice for the next year. Given the increasing amount of racial tensions between the Black Student Union, and everyone else that isn't a SJW, this could end up being a lulzy few months. I'll keep you guys posted.

Summer appears to be a slow time for social justice. Being forced apart from their fellow college students, the warriors only repost the same 5ish things. Over and over. And unfriend/ignore anyone who disagrees.
 
I think I get it now. SJWs are people who are trying to be martyrs for causes they don't actually understand.

c-no said:
A tumblr user giving a feminist sperg SJW (the OP) her two cents.
http://tenaflyviper.tumblr.com/post/93562822800/zoewarriorprincess-someday-i-want-to-have-to
Just read the last post that was replied to. It gives a look into the OP's thoughts on men (to sum it up, there are no good men).
Click to expand...
A friendly reminder that "Wow. Just wow." is not a real rebuttal and makes you look desperate to look smart.
 
A Random said:
I don't want to cause a ruckus, but this reminds me of a situation I paid witness to at a sporking blog. [People take books/fic and make fun of it.]

Basically, some dumb Pokémon fic which tried to teach people how to write Pokémon fic and did a terrible job of it was being sporked. One of the chapters was about how you shouldn't use any random tree names for Professors, because Oak, Elm and Birch were one specific tree type and if you used the most generic name ever you were doing it wrong. The fic took this moment to criticize Professor Ivy due to her name.

Then things went downhill when someone who already disapproved of the spork then declared the whole thing moot because the sporker defended Professor Ivy. Which would be one thing, except...
  1. the person didn't immediately explain their issue with the situation, so people started asking among themselves what could've caused it, and someone suggested it was the character's appearance - Professor Ivy is a rather sexualized character;
  2. the person declared that was untrue and that their issue was with the name, but didn't make a point very easily - that is, people were saying they didn't get why the name was so offensive compared to the body;
  3. instead of crafting a new explanation, the person accused the other posters of trying to enforce their own viewpoints on her and accused them of appropriating feminism - as if she wasn't allowed to be angry however she wanted - while the general community reaction was 'hey what's exactly so offensive about this, could you explain it?';
  4. she also declared Professor Juniper to be a sexist character, who was weak and lesser in the story compared to Cedric Juniper and was 'prevented from joining the story' thanks to 'her ovaries';
  5. while on another blog, she posted links to her 'main opponent's' FF.n profile and used them as evidence that their opinion was meaningless.

...so, yeah. The spork was shut down and stuff happened after that that doesn't matter. Looking at some of the posts here just reminded me of this. [And much as it's less-feminism-sperging now, I think actual incidents of heavy stuff should be considered rather than just yelling at random idiots.]
Click to expand...

Any links?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom