Shane Holmberg / Shane Presley Holmberg - The Containment Cell for The Breaker of Chairs, Eater of Shoes, Groomer of His Child Bride

  • Thread starter Thread starter AJ 447
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Army Burger said:
View attachment 769881

archive.fo

Shane Holmberg on Twitter: "The texts showing him talking about how M…

archived 23 May 2019 22:31:51 UTC
archive.fo archive.fo

"Not doing well so far"

Based on what, you tard?
Click to expand...

This lying faggot doesn't know what civil conspiracy is or how it's determined.

Not every conspirator has to know all of the steps for this to by civil conspiracy. Conspiracy is a derivative tort and liability is dependent upon participation in an underlying tort by at least one defendant.
 
PrinceofAllCucks said:
How embarrassing is gonna be when we find a group chat organizing everything. That's probably a bit optimistic, but should we really doubt that they aren't that exceptional?
Click to expand...
Considering how stupid they've proven to be already, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if they had a group chat.
 
Army Burger said:
Considering how stupid they've proven to be already, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if they had a group chat.
Click to expand...
I imagine there will be several such.

Unless it was intentional misinformation I don't think Shane and Ron have coordinated until very recently - there was a tweet (which I think has been deleted) sometime after the lawsuit was filed where Shane basically asked Ron to notice him; saying that he'd been defending him and Monica.

I think that was the start of anything Ron has done with Shane.

BUT I imagine there was some significant coordination back in January/February in different places between different people.
 
Urbanmech said:
Ok so removing the TCPA thing for a bit, can Casey still amend his defense now after submitting his response? Like could he go oops we forgot to add this defense and amend his answer, like the agent thing?
Click to expand...

Probably. It's pretty unlikely anyone would be prejudiced at this early date.
 
TexOffender said:
So vic is a millionaire, and somehow responsible for helping sexual abuse victims with his GFM.
Click to expand...
Shane thinks being a good person is doing a big public act that'll look impressive on social media because of course he does. He's too selfish to understand that Vic cares enough about his fans to not disappoint them by giving away the money they raised in good faith to be used in the lawsuit.
 
some_crazy said:
I imagine there will be several such.

Unless it was intentional misinformation I don't think Shane and Ron have coordinated until very recently - there was a tweet (which I think has been deleted) sometime after the lawsuit was filed where Shane basically asked Ron to notice him; saying that he'd been defending him and Monica.

I think that was the start of anything Ron has done with Shane.

BUT I imagine there was some significant coordination back in January/February in different places between different people.
Click to expand...
I'm looking forward to the white knighting that Shane will do for Dick Cheese Douglas, Lucario and Sabatage
 
LICK.png
 
Kiomei said:
Is it just me or does she look like an even uglier Ellen Page?
Click to expand...

I didn't think such a thing was possible, but apparently so.

Kiomei said:
Is he seriously still talking about the later than usual filing? What a moron, still clinging onto that because you haven't been right about anything.
Click to expand...
He's gotta cling to whatever scraps of relevancy he can find.
 
@Shane_Yes_That_One , buddy. When it's easier to keep up with multiple threads on Kiwi Farms than your Tweets and story changes; you've got a problem.

You're not getting pulled into this suit because you're irrelevant. You're not going to "get" to go to a deposition because you don't know sh**. You've acted like you were more important than you were as long as I've known you.

Go be with Rebecca, work on... well work and start building something. Quit being the ultimate simpering sperg and work on getting a life.

TL;DR Shane, sit down and STFU.
 
Not A Bug said:
@Shane_Yes_That_One , buddy. When it's easier to keep up with multiple threads on Kiwi Farms than your Tweets and story changes; you've got a problem.

You're not getting pulled into this suit because you're irrelevant. You're not going to "get" to go to a deposition because you don't know sh**. You've acted like you were more important than you were as long as I've known you.

Go be with Rebecca, work on... well work and start building something. Quit being the ultimate simpering sperg and work on getting a life.

TL;DR Shane, sit down and STFU.
Click to expand...
Good, honest advice that should be taken to heart.

Sadly, Shane will ignore it.
 
Army Burger said:
View attachment 770015

archive.fo

Shane Holmberg on Twitter: "Not take seriously the guy who knows stuf…

archived 24 May 2019 00:26:56 UTC
archive.fo archive.fo

Shane is getting butthurt that people aren't taking him seriously.
Click to expand...

Again: Verifying your info is responsible journalism.

You've a serious credibility problem here Shane. You've not actually demonstrated that you know anything, and in fact, have misrepresented others' points and changed your story on numerous occasions. And you seem incapable of not twisting anyone else's words when spoken. You only answer the questions you want to answer, and not the ones actually asked of you.
 
AnCapFool said:
Again: Verifying your info is responsible journalism.

You've a serious credibility problem here Shane. You've not actually demonstrated that you know anything, and in fact, have misrepresented others' points and changed your story on numerous occasions. And you seem incapable of not twisting anyone else's words when spoken. You only answer the questions you want to answer, and not the ones actually asked of you.
Click to expand...

Even if Shane does know stuff which Nick doesn't, so what? If it's something which comes out in discovery, then Shane will claim to have already known it whether he did or not.

I don't even know why Shane is trying to boost his own credibility. He's not going to be a witness and he's not a commentator. What he does or doesn't know is utterly irrelevant to this lawsuit.
 
Shane hasn't been right about pretty much anything so far so I guess he's decided to try the scattershot approach and hope he gets lucky and hits something.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom