skykiii
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2018
I didn't bring intelligence into it, you did.
OH REALLY? Because I just checked and... lookie here. This is the post where you're riding my ass about "not being able to solve mysteries" (IE an out-of-the-blue insult to my intelligence)...Likewise the emotion - I have tried to be polite and straightforward,
.....in response to a post where I was, in fact, trying to give AA the benefit of the doubt and take personal blame. Which you even fucking quote a part of.
Your next follow-up posts basically called me a liar, claimed I was making up the issue, and then when I presented a video of it, you tried to make it out like I was over-reacting to just one moment in a six-game series ("That's it? That's all it takes for you to check out?")
And then there's this bit:
So you ask what murder mysteries they like, reasoning that either they are severely off track with their criticism or they must be onto pure mystery kino and whatever they like will blow what you liked out of the water and you too will be embarrassed by umineko. And they start with encyclopaedia brown before moving on to sherlock holmes and Agatha Christie and they end by explaining they like two video game series you finished every entry of on release, series that you recommended to your nieces and nephews to learn how to solve mysteries, but they can't play them and have to watch other people play them. So they aren't onto pure mystery kino.
By your own damn admission here, what seemed like a good-faith hunt for more mystery media was actually you trying to get a read on me.
But sure, somehow I'm the one who is emotionally invested, not the guy who is doing secret tests and was doing them before we were even actually fighting.
You're sitting here saying I should "judge it as a deconstruction"... did you miss the part where I went into Umineko almost totally blind and that my posts about it were spur-of-the-moment "venting my frustration" reactions? To judge it "as a deconstruction," I would've had to read it knowing in advance that it was a deconstruction.Where? Because in our last few exchanges you said things that don't make sense if you were treating it as a deconstruction like
Also... I was about to respond to the rest of your post because it started to sound like you were conflating commentary/parody elements with "deconstruction," so I'm not even entirely sure you know what that term means... but I know where that's gonna go: two autists on a forum throwing their own personal definitions of what a word invented by up-their-ass literary theorists means, and I think we've both been terminally online enough to know that won't be productive.
But all I really have to say is this:
If a story is only good if you go in with foreknowledge and needling for a specific interpretation... then its a bad story. Compare Neon Genesis Evangelion or Metal Gear Solid 1, 2, and 3 where they are still great experiences even if you completely miss a lot of the commentary and subtext.... because they're still actually good stories.
Your defense of Maria's dialogue, for example, basically brings to mind this trend in indie game development from a few years back: people making bad games on purpose as a commentary or something. They stopped doing that because people very quickly realized that functionally there was little difference between an "ironically" bad game, and an actually bad game.
