Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Nox Was Right said:
Modern trannyism was invented by Magnus Hirschfeld, a jewish doctor in Weimar Germany who led an "Institute For Sexuality" that was burned down by the NS as well as his books. The fight (arguably, self-defense) against those degenerates didn't start with muh wokeism 15 years ago, it's much more ancient.
Click to expand...
What about John Money?
 
Sinner's Sandwich said:
There are poor people in Switzerland and Singapore. Poor doesn't mean third world shithole standards of living.
Click to expand...
No matter how bad you have it in life, things could always be worse. It's important to keep that perspective, but at the same time, it doesn't mean you aren't allowed to feel bad when life is going badly for you, or feel proud of yourself when you've made it. Compared to someone living in a remote village in Cameroon, Rowling (and everyone posting here) has had it unfathomably easy, but that doesn't mean she's wrong to point out that Watson will never know what it's like to struggle to both pay her bills and afford food for her kids. The reality check most likely wouldn't reach Watson if it came from someone she'd view as a charity case, but it probably stings coming from the person who made her career.
 
Emma is a classic case of a dumb cunt putting all her eggs in the wrong basket.

I knew she was amoral at best during the time she refused to say shit about her former boss harvey. It takes a special type of woman to gravitate towards a known sexpest, but hope/pray he ascends your career before his own empire falls. Modern day deal with the devil.
 
"Maybe the reason she hates us is because she is one of us! Not because we're gross".
1759348063491.png
Reddit | Archive
 
Lemmingwiser said:
But the claim that Watson never experienced any of that danger? If money and status was a cushion against danger, then Rowling wasn't in any either. Watson was in Hollywood, she was still a teenager when she was photographed with Weinstein, with that deer in the headlight look.
Click to expand...

Nah I'm not going to bend over backwards with speculation to go easy on her. Some people claimed because he was photographed with his hands on her as an adult at some public event that Weinstein raped Emma as a child. And because of that we should go treat her with kid gloves for the rest of her life. Okay, do you have any other evidence that Weinstein raped Emma as a child? Because Weinstein had sex with some women does that mean he raped every woman in Hollywood when they were children? Are we just going to give a lifetime immunity to strong criticism card to every woman in hollywood around the weinstein era?

Lemmingwiser said:
She endured all sort of lurid attention before she was 18 (it is close to child abuse to let your kids, particularly daughter star in something like this). Remember that Terry Crews was terrified of speaking out against certain hollywood producers and they molested him with impunity, it's not hard to imagine what kind of sway they have over a young actress.I consider this response about on the level if she had just immediately forgiven Watson like a doormat. Well written. Poor character
Click to expand...

Again its speculation that Emma was on the Internet reading all the comments about her or especially that she was in any real danger compared to others. You know that the average UK citizen isn't exactly living in the bosom of safety from violence or rape either right? Would they trade their squalid existence and anonymity where nobody gives a shit whether they live or die and the dangers that come with it for Emma's life of wealth and security guards and fame where everybody knows you and danger that came with that? A few might.



Lemmingwiser said:
I consider this response about on the level if she had just immediately forgiven Watson like a doormat. Well written. Poor character.
Click to expand...


Nah it was suprisingly professional. And eminently handleable for a 30 something grownass woman. From the headlines I half expected the level of insults and namecalling I see here and on social media but its a flowing informative enjoyable article you'd find in a good magazine or webpage. Say what you will about JKR but she's a decent writer. Almost certainly better than most fanfic authors and her critics.
 
Jonah Hill poster said:
View attachment 7986295
Click to expand...
"My real life pisses on her fiction."
I say this as a fan Mr. George, but given the choice between stories of coke-fueled anal sex or kid wizards fighting dragons, I'll pick the latter. Your lifestyle will never be normal, no matter how famous you are or how liberal society shifts. You will always be a freak, an abnormality and a servant of sin. Loved "Color By Numbers" by the way.
 
Jeff Dunham said:
"My real life pisses on her fiction."
I say this as a fan Mr. George, but given the choice between stories of coke-fueled anal sex or kid wizards fighting dragons, I'll pick the latter. Your lifestyle will never be normal, no matter how famous you are or how liberal society shifts. You will always be a freak, an abnormality and a servant of sin. Loved "Color By Numbers" by the way.
Click to expand...
I still find it more impressive (or odd) that Boy George is still famous after all these years. Maybe it’s just me, but I always confused him for Billy Idol when I was younger.
 
Jonah Hill poster said:
View attachment 7986295
Click to expand...
In fairness, he was a "guest judge" on a Project Runway episode in 2016.

Edit: wife reminds me it was Project Runway All Stars, not the main show.
Boy George only rated ho-hum hostess Alyssa Milano, and didn't get to be on with hot mama Heidi Klum. Demotion, I'd say.

But he exchanged dirty jokes with Isaac Mizrahi and I guess he got paid for that?
He has to do something for a living.
 
grump said:
Again its speculation that Emma was on the Internet reading all the comments about her or especially that she was in any real danger compared to others.
Click to expand...
weinstein.png

It's also speculation that Rowling was in real danger, but in both cases there's probably some truth to it. Here Watson was 18, the same day her cooch was photographed by a the literal gutter press up her skirt as she got out of the car. A couple years later a hack would publish her nude photos that were taken privately. These type of things may not quite be what Rowling experienced (a wifebeater) or what the experience was for the poor girls of the Rotherham scandal. But then Rowling is as much in favor of mass migration so politically to some degree culpable for that as much as Emma Watson would be for the tranny agenda and dangers that caused for women.

Also I'm criticizing Rowling for her timing, her message and her lack of accountability. I'm not saying people shouldn't criticize Watson and if you read my message better you would have read that I equated treated her with kid gloves equally bad as this easy slap.

As much as people are responsible for the damage trannies inflict on women by holding trannies on a pedestal for the last couple of years, so are women like Rowling responsible for holding women like Emma on a pedestal for no other reason than she is a woman.


ASeabear8952 said:
What about John Money?
Click to expand...
John Money received the Magnus Hirschfeld medal from a German institute in 2002. Just 2 years before the suicide of David Rheimer. As far as I know, that and their work on tranny stuff is the only link between them.
 
I find it funny that in my country, JK Rowling was never demonized. I've personally never cared much for HP, but it is a beloved franchise and its power never diminished. I work at a school, and last year for international women's day, girls were given a post-it for them to write down the names of women who inspires them to put in a mural. The most common names were those associated with their family & friends, Staff (teachers from our school) and JK Rowling.
 
Lemmingwiser said:
View attachment 7986408

It's also speculation that Rowling was in real danger, but in both cases there's probably some truth to it. Here Watson was 18, the same day her cooch was photographed by a the literal gutter press up her skirt as she got out of the car. A couple years later a hack would publish her nude photos that were taken privately. These type of things may not quite be what Rowling experienced (a wifebeater) or what the experience was for the poor girls of the Rotherham scandal. But then Rowling is as much in favor of mass migration so politically to some degree culpable for that as much as Emma Watson would be for the tranny agenda and dangers that caused for women.

Also I'm criticizing Rowling for her timing, her message and her lack of accountability. I'm not saying people shouldn't criticize Watson and if you read my message better you would have read that I equated treated her with kid gloves equally bad as this easy slap.

As much as people are responsible for the damage trannies inflict on women by holding trannies on a pedestal for the last couple of years, so are women like Rowling responsible for holding women like Emma on a pedestal for no other reason than she is a woman.



John Money received the Magnus Hirschfeld medal from a German institute in 2002. Just 2 years before the suicide of David Rheimer. As far as I know, that and their work on tranny stuff is the only link between them.
Click to expand...


I believe she's 20 in this pic. At 20 I can just as easily speculate that she like a lot of other of Weinstein's so called victims sought arrangement with him of their own accord and it would be as or more likely than the theory she was raped as a child by Weinstein. Now maybe you can still feel sorry for her but my pity is limited compared to actual crime victims. Frankly if all he got out of it was some handsies through an outfit she chose to wear and she got in on a few major films she seems to have gotten a pretty good deal.

You are right that JKR shouldn't be immune to criticism for what she enabled too though.
 
I completely missed this a couple days ago when it happened, I fucking love when JK Rowling decides to speak about stuff like this. That lady is great. Fuck trannies. Harry Potter was pretty good as a series too, and just when it seemed like the fandom was nothing but faggots, JK Rowling turns out to be based as hell.
 
Say Harvey indeed assaulted Emma in any way, why didn't she, the feminist, denounced him openly?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom