Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Lifeguard Hermit said:
It's obvious that she had to do that scene repetitiously and she was very pissed at the crew.

She's so mad she even stumbles walking up to him and that's the take that they used.
Click to expand...
Sorry, is it this?

ew.jpg

A few people mentioned knowing the face exactly, but I'm a bit inept and haven't seen the HP movies, so I'm unsure which face is being referenced.
 
Rancid Xylitol said:
Sorry, is it this?

View attachment 7986790

A few people mentioned knowing the face exactly, but I'm a bit inept and haven't seen the HP movies, so I'm unsure which face is being referenced.
Click to expand...

Off-topic, but the drift from wizard robes and school uniforms to trashy 00s clothes was tragic, almost as tragic as the hairstyles in Goblet
 
grump said:
I believe she's 20 in this pic. At 20 I can just as easily speculate that she like a lot of other of Weinstein's so called victims sought arrangement with him of their own accord and it would be as or more likely than the theory she was raped as a child by Weinstein. Now maybe you can still feel sorry for her but my pity is limited compared to actual crime victims. Frankly if all he got out of it was some handsies through an outfit she chose to wear and she got in on a few major films she seems to have gotten a pretty good deal.
Click to expand...
I looked it up again. It was july 2009. 19.

The upskirt pictures happened on her 18th birthday (because a just 24 hours they would have been illegal).

Steinercard said:
Malfoy didn't get vaxxed either so the pureblood meme remains unbeaten.
Click to expand...

It's funny how the type of people typically described as evil more or less by Rowling turned out to be the good guys.
 
I don’t think anyone involved with HP has ever once backed her up with full-throated agreement that her views are correct. The closest they’ve ever come is “she’s entitled to her opinion, nothing she’s said warrants this level of vitriol”. A few of them put an “I don’t agree with her, but…” disclaimer on their statements, but for the most part still clearly stated they liked and respected her.

The list of people decent enough to publicly show a shred of loyalty includes Ralph Fiennes, Robbie Coltrane, Helena Bonham Carter, John Cleese, Jim Broadbent, Miriam Margoyles, and Evanna Lynch.

Jason Issacs and Tom Felton just refused to condemn her more than anything else. When pressed in interviews they refused to directly address anything related to trans politics (can’t blame them) so they get accused of fence-sitting.

Eddie Redmayne (he’s in the Fantastic Beasts movies) is an interesting case. He gets away with it because he made a big deal about how much he loves troons, but also felt bad enough for the abuse JK Rowling was getting that he admitted sending her a private letter of support.
 
яндекс said:
What makes anybody honestly think that they ever opposed misogyny, racism, political murders, terrorism, child rape, human trafficking, genocide, religious fundamentalism or antisemitism?
Click to expand...
A lot of them genuinely seem to think they have in the sense that they believe once they have destroyed all systems of oppression utopia will manifest and we shall be freed from all suffering. Laws criminalize minoritized bodies as a means of imposing capitalism enforced white supremacy. Therefore somehow if there is no money everyone will just have anything they want, and in that post-capitalist-imposed-scarcity world hatred will melt away, all indoctrination undone, and we will become queer mega-polycule.

If I'm cynical, they don't have solutions for those problems because that sort of person can't comprehend ideas like the future.

Really cynically, why address any of those when you can use them to try to create political solidarity from a large number of groups that otherwise have very different social and economic goals? Never catch that car, just stoke fear and grift, grift, grift and maybe you'll keep them in your fold while fattening your own bank accounts. Or at least that's what modern activism looks like to me. The end is the power and money to do what you want and punish all opposition.

Sinner's Sandwich said:
Because it's dangerous. JK can't be cancelled and get hurt by the insane trannywoke mob but the actors can.
Click to expand...
This is the unfortunate reality.
 
If you all want an idea of what Emma Watson's content output since Harry Potter has been, just take one look at this clip from "The Circle."


I stumbled upon this years back when reading Diego Tutweiller's Letterboxd, and it's a gem of trash. The acting is some of the worst I've ever seen, the guy in the posted video is from cult classic "Boyhood," and I think he should've quit once that film was out, 'cause he has no range. The messaging and out of touch political commentary (starring Patton "wife killer" Oswalt and dual-citizenship elite Tom Hanks) is next level. "There were death threats!" Welcome to the internet. It's unfortunate this is the final performance from acting legend, Bill Paxton, he deserved a much better sendoff. Emma is classic case of sheltered and pampered Hollywood child actress who believed she had a future after her wizards and magic series, which she had no hand in writing. She was picked for a role, nothing else. J.K. Rowling came up with everything. Emma should be on her knees groveling for more because that's the only thing that's kept her relevant. When the pendulum fully swings to the other side and the trans crowd is finally ostracized from mainstream society, never forget the people who defended them. They are not free from the damage they've caused to women and children.
 
Trans rights is the antithesis of women's rights
saying your a feminist whilst advocating for transwomen to women's only facilities shows that you arent a feminist.

say what people want about Rowling
atleast she is steadfast and consistent in her feminism

also its frightening how much Trannies always target kids with their messaging
whether it be via cocomelon, blue's clues and etc.
 
rbzfan said:
The acting is some of the worst I've ever seen,
Click to expand...
Did you see Emma Watson in the Beauty and the Beast live action remake? Her acting in the film is atrocious. Her line delivery is so stunted, she comes across as mentally slow in the movie.

I'm convinced the Beauty and the Beast film killed what was left of her Hollywood career, Emma never got cast in anything major after it.

Liber Nihil said:
don’t think anyone involved with HP has ever once backed her up with full-throated agreement that her views are correct.
Click to expand...

If I remember correctly, I'm pretty sure the vegan chick who played Luna Lovegood, backed up J.K. Rowling wholeheartedly. She seems to be an outspoken animal activist type, so it'd make sense that she'd be against child hormone troonery/what is essentially medical experimentation on small children.
 
Last edited:
Eventide said:
Did you see Emma Watson in the Beauty and the Beast live action remake? Her acting in the film is atrocious. Her line delivery is so stunted, she comes across as mentally slow in the movie.

I'm convinced the Beauty and the Beast film killed what was left of her Hollywood career, Emma never got cast in anything major after it.
Click to expand...
She was the one who suggested the changes. That she was the inventor and not her father.
 
Surfin Terf said:
I don't know why, but this seems to be a... pun? Based on their respective Chinese zodiac signs. I checked it out and it does indeed check out, Rowling was born in '65, the year of the (wood) snake, and Watson was born in '90, the year of the (fire) horse.
Click to expand...
I should point out that in wuxing, fire does not conquer wood; instead, wood generates fire, which is incredibly apt when it comes to Rowling and Watson's relationship.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom