Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
So let me get this straight. These people have decided that these characters are autistic, and they’re calling Rowling ableist because these characters are badly treated? These characters who are not canonically anything other than eccentric?
Luna is weird because her mom died when she was 9 and she was raised exclusively by her dad, who's basically the wizard Alex Jones. The point isn't "autists are crazy conspiracy theorists" it's "kids who are raised by parents with bizarre beliefs will adopt those beliefs (because to them that's normal) and be ostracized by their peers as a consequence." Anything else is just a useless bad faith reading.
 
JK Rowling may very well be one of the most controversial figures of the 21st century - and this has led to many people re-examining her writing, and seeing if Harry Potter was ever that well written of a book series to begin with.
”Many people" = trannies and tranny orbiters who LOVED Harry Potter until Rowling came out as based and TERF pilled, causing them to start making up supposed flaws that allegedly prove that the series was always a steaming pile of racist anti-semitic ableist homphobic transphobic etc shit, out of pure coping and seething. I highly doubt anybody else has changed their opinion on Harry Potter because of Rowling's views, whether they love or hate the franchise.
 
Absolute hilarity to suggest that Martin will be remembered for longer than Rowling. Martin's legacy will be that he never finished his magnum opus. I've personally read far more of Martin and quite enjoy his short stories and side projects, but if you want your work to be remembered you should actually finish said work.
 
OK the Upper Deck controversy is dragging on and it's getting properly funny.

First of all Marceline Leiman, the Frank Drebin of online campaigners, has got the Tabletop Game Designers Association to urge Upper Deck not to make a Harry Potter board game, a mere few days after it already said it wasn't intending to.

Tabletop Game Designers Association urges Legendary series publisher Upper Deck not to make a Harry Potter board game after company celebrates licensing deal



1769270305579.png 1769270326782.png 1769270396055.png 1769270421928.png

Upper Deck, the publisher of the Legendary series of deck-building board games, has been urged not to create a Harry Potter-based tabletop title amid ongoing anti-trans campaigning from the character’s creator, JK Rowling.

Professional organisation The Tabletop Game Designers Association made the plea in the wake of Upper Deck announcing a deal for the “coveted” Harry Potter licence earlier this month, calling on the publisher to “help keep gaming a welcoming environment”.

Rowling – a dollar billionaire thanks to Harry Potter – has used financial proceeds from her creation to directly fund organisations attempting to strip trans people of their rights, and has spent the last several years making anti-trans statements.

Upper Deck said on January 7 that it would begin creating collectibles for the Harry Potter franchise, starting with two sets of trading cards due for release later this year, adding that it was “excited to bring its iconic brands and flagship products to the world of Harry Potter”.

The company’s previous collaboration with Warner Bros Discovery Global Consumer Products saw it launch a DC trading card set in March last year, which was followed in October with the announcement of Legendary: A DC Deckbuilding Game.

Following the TTGDA plea and rising numbers of comments across Upper Deck’s social media calling out the decision, the publisher yesterday made a single-sentence response on BlueSky and a BGG thread saying “Upper Deck has no plans to produce Harry Potter games at this time”.

But that response has not allayed the fears of board game designer Marceline Leiman, a TTGDA board member and founder of the Block collective – a group of board gamers she says “share the goal of sharing resources and information, disrupting bigoted spaces, and engaging in serious conversations on the topic of trans rights”.
Marceline Leiman

Leiman said on BlueSky, “Precisely the problem. You can and likely will in the future. WE DON’T WANT THIS. And this isn’t just about concerns of a game coming out from you. Please cancel any and all products that use JKR’s blood money.

“Please respond directly to the issues your community are flagging for you all across your social media that you keep erasing and blocking. It’s undeniable that every company that supports this IP plays an economic function connected to this transphobic death cult machine.

“Making this decision isn’t just a business decision. It’s a value based decision. This could all be connected to ignorance or misunderstanding – and if it is, PLEASE COMMUNICATE AND WORK WITH US. We actively want to work with you and help you learn and grow based on your failure to support us.

“You’re saying you’re transphobic without saying you’re transphobic. You’re telling us to get bent. You’re telling us you don’t care. If you want to be better than your actions have been so far, speak up. Because so far… this non-response has been unacceptable.

“I insist any and all readers following this story continue with the boycott of Upper Deck products. No purchase, promotional video, post, or ANYTHING that can trade them attention for the algorithms. Don’t give them an inch. Not until they give us a proper response and a plan to move forward.”

BoardGameWire contacted Upper Deck several days ago with questions about its plans for the Harry Potter licence and the pushback it had received so far, but no one at the company has responded.

Last year Codenames publisher Czech Games Edition faced a boycott from some of board gaming’s biggest and most influential reviewers, including Shut Up & Sit Down and No Pun Included, after deciding to release a new Harry Potter-themed version of the title.

Immediate online criticism of the move intensified two days later when CGE released a short statement attempting to justify its decision to release the game – which was panned for going out of its way to avoid mentioning Harry Potter or JK Rowling by name.

TTGDA was among the critical voices of CGE’s decision, saying at the time, “Author JK Rowling’s extreme anti-trans rhetoric has caused physical and emotional harm to a particularly vulnerable group, and the licensing fees she receives from the game will be used to support these attacks.

“CGE released a statement about the controversy around their decision, but it fell far short of anything meaningful.

“TTGDA is dedicated to fostering diversity in designers and diversity in viewpoints. However we do not accept intolerance and demonization of a specific group as an acceptable viewpoint. This is particularly true as anti-trans rhetoric and action has been increasing in many countries around the world, including the United Kingdom and United States.”

In a follow-up response two weeks later CGE apologised “unreservedly” for failing to take into account how “the harmful views of the story’s creator have escalated into harmful actions”.

The publisher committed to donating 100% of the game’s profits to appropriate charities, and said an amount equal to or greater than the fee paid to license the product would go directly to organisations that provide support for the trans community.

It said at the time, “Many of you have expressed your understandable anger, pain, and disappointment through a variety of platforms. Frankly, we were not prepared for the volume of the response. As a result, multiple accounts and comments were blocked or muted that should not have been.

“We would never want anyone experiencing the pain this situation has caused to then feel like they are being silenced. So for that, too, we want to sincerely apologize.

“Like the world we live in, CGE is made up of individuals with various backgrounds, gender identities, sexual orientations, and belief systems. None of us would ever want to take actions that would hurt or restrict the rights of another human being.

“We commit to remaining supportive of an inclusive and welcoming community of gamers. We believe in the rights of all people to have their own identity, and we reject hate and bigotry in all their forms. Trans rights are human rights.”

Last year Upper Deck lost a long-running legal battle with Ravensburger, which it had accused of stealing the design of its trading card game Rush of Ikorr in order to create the hugely successful Disney Lorcana TCG.

Next the Discord chat has now exploded because he and a couple others are camping there.

Because a TRA last week warned people against posting pictures of cats while [TRANS GENOCIIIDE!!!] someone is posting the odd picture of trading cards with cats on. This is very much triggering Marceline but he is going to rise above it:

1769270992969.png

For forty-four minutes:

1769271050989.png

That's right, he has reported another user as a spammer for being on topic against his instructions!
1769271143853.png

I am particularly amused by this comment:

1769271307334.png

Things have escalated in the world generally well past the 'polite discussion' people would like the internet to be for.
Trans people are fighting for their very existence against transphobes with vast resources, and if those that defend them have to adhere to a level of decorum that the oppression is not also held to, then there's no way back.
You mentioned MLK and Malcolm X. This is genuinely the same.

WE ARE INVOLVED IN A WAR FOR OUR SURVIVAL! TIME TO BE IMPATIENT IN THE DISCORD CHAT OF A TRADING-CARD MANUFACTURER! THEY ASKED FOR THIS! GERONIMO!
 
Luna is weird because her mom died when she was 9 and she was raised exclusively by her dad, who's basically the wizard Alex Jones. The point isn't "autists are crazy conspiracy theorists" it's "kids who are raised by parents with bizarre beliefs will adopt those beliefs (because to them that's normal) and be ostracized by their peers as a consequence." Anything else is just a useless bad faith reading.

As otterlynoah even points out, the others like Snape and Neville are also traumatized to an extent.
But they also behave within the boundaries of a “neurotypical” kid, who has gone through the trauma.

Neville is shy and uncomfortable around people because his parents were both driven insane to the point that they live full time in hospital.
His grandmother was then his primary caregiver and even if she seemed a bit batty and controlling, that makes sense as she has seen her child and child’s spouse suffer horribly and obviously doesn’t want the same for Neville.
Not the best way to go about this, but people do react like that.

Snape had an abusive father and clearly didn’t have many friends until he went to Hogwarts.
Loads of neurotypical but a bit sensitive boys fall in love as a teen with a childhood friend. Loads of teenage boys get a bit obsessed with a girl they like.
Plus if she falls for your school bully, then that’s going to cause some serious resentment and anger.
None of that is exclusively autistic in a behavioral context.
Also, the dating pool is limited in the wizarding circles, the postscript of Harry Potter indicated that pretty much all of the mentioned characters paired off and married.
If Snape was head over heels for this girl then maybe no one else matched up and it wasn’t like he could try another town or social circle.

I think this OtterlyNoah was home-schooled and an only child.
And is so sheltered he has no fucking clue about other people apart from context he has got from media and Reddit.

Unfortunately, this kind of person is likely to be not uncommon in society moving forwards.

Again, we need another Nam.
 
So let me get this straight. These people have decided that these characters are autistic, and they’re calling Rowling ableist because these characters are badly treated? These characters who are not canonically anything other than eccentric?
Keep in mind, these people decided that the House Elves at Hogwarts are enslaved and don't want to work there for no wages. Despite the fact that they are based on existing legends of creatures who do housework at night and get offended if you offer them gifts. Despite the fact that they refuse to work in certain places because Hermione tried to "free" them there. Despite the fact that of the two freed house elves, one is a depressed alcoholic because of it and the other works for wages as a matter of principle, but negotiated his wages down.

But no, JK Rowling is lying in order to justify slavery and all the textual evidence is fake. The difference between lying and writing fiction in this case eludes me, but they're absolutely certain that there's a difference and it's self-evident.
 
Bizarrely I've seen a few people complain that John Williams has not been hired again! What a stupid idea to get a composer to soundtrack the same story twice.
<Film score composer sperging>
I did not expect John Williams to be hired again. He's 93 and he already composed multiple superlative Harry Potter themes and soundtracks.

But for the replacement to be Hans Zimmer? Ugh. I defy anyone to hum or sing a Hans Zimmer theme, or remember a single movie he scored without looking it up.

The first eight notes of John Williams' Harry Potter 'Hedwig's Theme' (main theme) is more memorable than anything Hans Zimmer has ever scored added together.

I appreciate they seem to have this idea in their heads that "JK Rowling earning more money" = "funding for the Transatzgruppen",
One can only imagine if Rowling actually did put a significant amount of her wealth towards anti-trans causes. Her main contribution is her wit and intellectual energy on Twitter. Rowling's wealth helps, but it is her mind, not her money, that makes her dangerous to the trans cause.
 
One can only imagine if Rowling actually did put a significant amount of her wealth towards anti-trans causes. Her main contribution is her wit and intellectual energy on Twitter. Rowling's wealth helps, but it is her mind, not her money, that makes her dangerous to the trans cause.

She puts significant money into rape and abuse facilities around the UK and other parts of the world where women and children need to be protected from men.

She has a very specific policy. Biological women only.
 
She puts significant money into rape and abuse facilities around the UK and other parts of the world where women and children need to be protected from men.

She has a very specific policy. Biological women only.
The troons could of course open their own shelters… if that was the point.
 
the troons are abusive men, which is the point.

Precisely.

The Troons are just furious they are not allowed into women’s rape shelters as they know that once they get raped by another troon or a chaser, they will need to have a captive group of women to rape to help them get over the trauma.
 
Keep in mind, these people decided that the House Elves at Hogwarts are enslaved and don't want to work there for no wages. Despite the fact that they are based on existing legends of creatures who do housework at night and get offended if you offer them gifts. Despite the fact that they refuse to work in certain places because Hermione tried to "free" them there. Despite the fact that of the two freed house elves, one is a depressed alcoholic because of it and the other works for wages as a matter of principle, but negotiated his wages down.

But no, JK Rowling is lying in order to justify slavery and all the textual evidence is fake. The difference between lying and writing fiction in this case eludes me, but they're absolutely certain that there's a difference and it's self-evident.

As someone who was familiar with house sprites and "brownie" folklore as a child before ever reading Harry Potter, it's so irritating watching people twist themselves in knots insisting that it's ACK-SHU-ALLEEE a one to one allegory for slavery (specifically American slavery, because OFC the loudest ones are American who don't seem to have the ability to understand that a thing that shares some similarities with another thing DOESN'T MEAN ITS SECRETLY THAT OTHER THING). God forbid JK Rowling use her British heritage and folklore for inspiration.

(they do a similar thing with Kingsley Shacklebolt. Shacklebolt= slave. Isn't he the head of the Wizard Cops, though? Could it be that the name refers to his profession as a law enforcer, and the "shackles" are meant for the criminals and bad guys?)
 
But for the replacement to be Hans Zimmer? Ugh. I defy anyone to hum or sing a Hans Zimmer theme, or remember a single movie he scored without looking it up.
BWAAAAM BWAAAAM
BWAAAAM BWAAAAM
bwaaaam bwaaaam

How quickly people forgot Inception...
 
BWAAAAM BWAAAAM
BWAAAAM BWAAAAM
bwaaaam bwaaaam

How quickly people forgot Inception...
He did a couple of Nolan movies, personally I like the Interstellar soundtrack, but I know the whole movie is controversial. Hans Zimmer did score quite a few popular movies, I don't think he is a bad choice.
 
(they do a similar thing with Kingsley Shacklebolt. Shacklebolt= slave. Isn't he the head of the Wizard Cops, though? Could it be that the name refers to his profession as a law enforcer, and the "shackles" are meant for the criminals and bad guys?)
This one kind of pisses me off, because it’s a very American view of slavery. Where slaves were seen in Britain, it was usually as servants to the wealthy - the ones in shackles were out in the West Indies. At the same time, there were plenty of free black people, including a number of successful businessmen (some of them formed the Sons of Africa, an abolitionist pressure group). It wasn’t exactly the colourblind paradise portrayed in some modern costume dramas, but it was rather more complicated than black = slave.

Then you also had the Colonial forces of the British Empire and the postwar waves of immigration and the situation becomes more complicated still.

Britain didn’t have Jim Crow laws because the freed slaves were thousands of miles away, consequently there isn’t that direct line from slavery to living memory.

Sorry to sperg, but this is a subject that tweaks my autism.
 
Absolute hilarity to suggest that Martin will be remembered for longer than Rowling. Martin's legacy will be that he never finished his magnum opus. I've personally read far more of Martin and quite enjoy his short stories and side projects, but if you want your work to be remembered you should actually finish said work.
It’s telling that his books contain fairly graphic child rape, incest and brown characters who are slaves or savages, and none of the woke mob are frothing at the mouth over them. It’s almost like they just fling mud at anyone who criticizes troons instead of holding real opinions.
 
Back
Top Bottom