Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
You’re not wrong, but I was surprised at how pro-Rowling the thread was. It wasn’t super pro-Rowling, but I was expecting a Reddit thread from writers to be full of troons and handmaidens
Troons have worn out their welcome with their deranged, violent and extremely male behavior.
 
Meanwhile on Buzzfeed:

View attachment 8118717

View attachment 8118719


I wonder if this could inspire the next fascinating Buzzfeed quiz. Who did JK Rowling get murdered? (*), what atrocity did she deny?, how many women's legs did she personally force open during a rape? etc... etc...

(*) I think they mean Imane Khelife.
11 weeks later that person is still at it on Buzzfeed,

1769117678024.png 1769117696938.png
 
Upper Deck replied.
Screenshot_20260122_160209_Firefox.png
Link (a)
The ringleader in the tranny horde was not happy
Screenshot_20260122_160135_Firefox.png
Link (a)
“At this time”

Precisely the problem. You can and likely will in the future. WE DON’T WANT THIS.

And this isn’t *just* about concerns of a game coming out from you. Please cancel *any and all products* that use JKR’s blood money.

Please respond directly to the issues your community are flagging for you all across your social media that you keep erasing and blocking.

It’s undeniable that every company that supports this IP plays an economic function connected to this transphobic death cult machine.

Making this decision isn’t just a business decision. It’s a value based decision.

This could all be connected to ignorance or misunderstanding—and if it is, PLEASE COMMUNICATE AND WORK WITH US.

We actively want to work with you and help you learn and grow based on your failure to support us.

You’re saying you’re transphobic without saying you’re transphobic. You’re telling us to get bent. You’re telling us you don’t care.

If you want to be better than your actions have been so far, speak up. Because so far, this nothing but this non-response has been unacceptable.

I insist any and all readers following this story continue with the boycott of Upper Deck products.

No purchase, promotional video, post, or ANYTHING that can trade them attention for the algorithms.

Don’t give them an inch. Not until they give us a proper response and a plan to move forward.

Mistake to say anything imo. I didn't check board game geek but the "campaign" had run out of steam with even "Marceline" moving onto other things.
 
Imagine acquiring a hot property like HP and not using it. They definitely wait till the storm has past while working on a project internally. Probably have hired some extra people to figure out how they can publish and shut down the angry trannies before they can gain critical mass.
 
I miss the days when if people didn't like something,, they just wouldn't buy it.

How arrogant do you have to be to try and tell everyone in the world what they can and cannot buy?
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
Upper Deck replied.
View attachment 8460310
Link (a)
The ringleader in the tranny horde was not happy
View attachment 8460311
Link (a)
“At this time”

Precisely the problem. You can and likely will in the future. WE DON’T WANT THIS.

And this isn’t *just* about concerns of a game coming out from you. Please cancel *any and all products* that use JKR’s blood money.

Please respond directly to the issues your community are flagging for you all across your social media that you keep erasing and blocking.

It’s undeniable that every company that supports this IP plays an economic function connected to this transphobic death cult machine.

Making this decision isn’t just a business decision. It’s a value based decision.

This could all be connected to ignorance or misunderstanding—and if it is, PLEASE COMMUNICATE AND WORK WITH US.

We actively want to work with you and help you learn and grow based on your failure to support us.

You’re saying you’re transphobic without saying you’re transphobic. You’re telling us to get bent. You’re telling us you don’t care.

If you want to be better than your actions have been so far, speak up. Because so far, this nothing but this non-response has been unacceptable.

I insist any and all readers following this story continue with the boycott of Upper Deck products.

No purchase, promotional video, post, or ANYTHING that can trade them attention for the algorithms.

Don’t give them an inch. Not until they give us a proper response and a plan to move forward.

Mistake to say anything imo. I didn't check board game geek but the "campaign" had run out of steam with even "Marceline" moving onto other things.
Her "blood money" lol. The money is from delighting children. But they aren't taking her money, they are paying her money which they hope to use to make more money by delighting more children. Now in theory JK will then use that money to genocide the transgender race, but she already has an essentially infinite amount of money for that so who cares? Just let the kids be delighted until the corporations eventually ruin the franchise after she sells it entirely like Lucas.
 
Imagine acquiring a hot property like HP and not using it. They definitely wait till the storm has past while working on a project internally. Probably have hired some extra people to figure out how they can publish and shut down the angry trannies before they can gain critical mass.

Some people will retain a hateboner for something for WAY longer than usual, purely out of spite. Some Chinese and Koreans still have their grudges against Japan solely because they exist as a country. Even after Donald Trump passes away, TDS will still be a thing, and RDS will still be a thing even after Rowling passes away.
 
How arrogant do you have to be to try and tell the everyone in the world what they can and cannot buy?
They are the greatest control freaks of all time. Not only do they try to influence what you can and cannot buy, they say you're on the wrong side of history if you buy something from an unapproved progressive store.

God, I wish Rowling would actually sue one of these people, but she won't.
 
Unless transgenderism dies, I'm actually genuinely scared at what will be done to her stuff.

I mean, the leftoids did everything they could to vandalize Tolkien's stuff, a good while after his death.
 
God bless those trannies for spending every waking hour of their prematurely shortened lives for taking everything our girl JKR says out of context.
 
Imagine acquiring a hot property like HP and not using it. They definitely wait till the storm has past while working on a project internally. Probably have hired some extra people to figure out how they can publish and shut down the angry trannies before they can gain critical mass.
My guess is that they’re waiting for the Netflix series.
 
This level of hyperbolic lying makes me actually autistically mad at the internet.
It took me a while to even realize what they even meant with “tried to get a woman murdered for not being feminine enough”. And I only worked it out because they use similar phrasing for that specific event so often.
Would have figured it out a lot easier if they had said, “called a male with a DSD a man”
 
It took me a while to even realize what they even meant with “tried to get a woman murdered for not being feminine enough”. And I only worked it out because they use similar phrasing for that specific event so often.
Would have figured it out a lot easier if they had said, “called a male with a DSD a man”
Yeah it's Imane Khelife. They are all in complete denial about his situation because they think he confirms their pretence that TERFism hurts real women.
 

JK Rowling may very well be one of the most controversial figures of the 21st century - and this has led to many people re-examining her writing, and seeing if Harry Potter was ever that well written of a book series to begin with.

Harry Potter really came out at the perfect time in general, since it essentially founded the YA fiction movement and had no real competition until the mid 2000s, when series like Percy Jackson, Kingdom Keepers and Hungers Games showed - and now that there are fair comparions, a number of people have been discussing how many autistic coded characters in JK Rowling's Wizarding World universe are seemingly intentionally mistreated by the author that created them.

This has led many to speculate, given some of the genuine brutality these autistic coded characters undergo, that JK Rowling may harbor some kind of ableism for autistic people overall - and that seems to be absolutely the case, with her comparing autistic people to "crazy conspiracy theorists" - oh boy.

So today, let's dive into JK Rowling's controversies, how she has intentionally mistreated her autistic coded characters throughout her writing, and what GOOD autistic coded media should look like overall.

0:00 Introduction - JK Rowling's many, many controversies in the 21st century
7:29 What IS an autistic coded character?
10:03 Luna Lovegood is SORELY mistreated constantly in the books, and it never changes
20:00 JK Rowling thinks all autistic people are "crazy conspiracy theorists" which makes no sense and is harmful rhetoric
24:00 Snape is wildly mistreated and embodies many harmful autistic stereotypes
27:21 Newt Scamander is the only TRULY good autistic coded character in the Wizarding World - but even he is wasted
30:00 Newt's empathy is his strength
36:43 Better autistic coded media for you to check out instead
42:00 Conclusion
 
JK Rowling may very well be one of the most controversial figures of the 21st century - and this has led to many people re-examining her writing, and seeing if Harry Potter was ever that well written of a book series to begin with.

This idiot misses the point entirely.

Harry and company were just behaving like kids of their age would.
The outcast kids would always be given an unflattering nickname.
Kids pick on other kids at school, often autistic kids get picked on because they don’t fit in.

Even the more noble and friendly to everyone kids at school would feel embarrassed if a girl they liked saw them hanging out exclusively with a pair of unpopular kids.

J.K. Rowling wasn’t trying to make a joke out of Luna, she was just writing her from a perspective which would make sense to her intended reading audience.

The whole video is an exercise in telling the world that OtterlyNoah is socially crippled, without saying he is socially crippled.
 
So let me get this straight. These people have decided that these characters are autistic, and they’re calling Rowling ableist because these characters are badly treated? These characters who are not canonically anything other than eccentric?
 
Back
Top Bottom