- Joined
- Jul 12, 2017
They cucked themselves to Mark Waid, who is an alpha nerd who is one of the head honchos of Marvel. The same Marvel that is keeping the Antarctic Press studios lights on by renting out studio space in the Antartic Press building, or somesuch.
Yes, that means that Mark Waid either directly or indirectly used Marvel's influence over AP to force them to break their contract. AP flat out states this during deposition when they state they were worried for "their friends at Marvel." Those friends at Marvel were using AP's building to do color work for Marvel.
If Meyer was going through Ty Beard, Marvel would probably be getting a letter in the next few weeks.
I agree with your assessment, however would you like to try and take on the mouse's lawyers? Much safer (plus funnier) to nail Waid for his actions rather than Marvel for their employee's actions.
Someone feel free to correct me but I think you would have to prove that Waid was acting as an employee of Marvel and not as himself at the time of the interference. If he never outright tells them about his position or any repercussions coming from that direction it could be tricky to prove (especially since that would be Marvel's best way out of it, throw Waid under the bus). We can see clearly there was an implied threat but we're talking getting a judge to know the first thing about comics and why Waid would be well known.
Now the fact he is still working for them after taking action to try and shoot down a competator (for any reason) speaks poorly of them and their business ethics, but who doesn't know that the mouse runs a pseudo-monopoly by now?
A question for those more versed in law than myself; if this all goes Meyer's way as it should does AP have a cause of action against him for the money they lost by not printing the comic after Waid's interference (and those of the minions he sent to dogpile)?
Last edited: