EnkiNikopol
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2018
Is it possible Waid is potentially a pasty patsy for plutocrats perched farther up the totem pole of the publishing politburo?
Nah, he got too much of an ego for that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is it possible Waid is potentially a pasty patsy for plutocrats perched farther up the totem pole of the publishing politburo?
At the end of the day Waid the only one getting fucked. I'm gonna love the eventual moment the horde turns on him for failing to take down the head Nazi.My opinion is Zaid is going to bleed his dumbass client and his paypigs for as much money as he can get then force him into a settlement, or betray him if he can't convince him, like he snitched out one of his previous clients to the CIA.
Aren't people with huge egos typically easier to manipulate than regular people?Nah, he got too much of an ego for that.
Agnew alliteration award, right there.Is it possible Waid is potentially a pasty patsy for plutocrats perched farther up the totem pole of the publishing politburo?
I'm placing my bets on him coming prepared with a "big hero speech" that he'll attempt to deliver for the record.I imagine him completely chimping out in an autistic rage at some point during his deposition, probably after getting caught in one of his constant lies.
"BUT I SAW IT WORK IN THE MOVIES!" he screamed as the judge held him in contempt of court.I'm placing my bets on him coming prepared with a "big hero speech" that he'll attempt to deliver for the record.
He'll be okay if he reserves it for the part where his counsel is questioning him."BUT I SAW IT WORK IN THE MOVIES!" he screamed as the judge held him in contempt of court.
A painful financial settlement in Zack's favor will be very satisfying, but it's likely to be our only satisfaction. They will never admit Waid did wrong. The narrative will be "evil redneck Texas judge sides with Nazis." You watch.
Which will be fun because that would result in more industry people getting dragged into more lawsuits. Keep those trains running.A painful financial settlement in Zack's favor will be very satisfying, but it's likely to be our only satisfaction. They will never admit Waid did wrong. The narrative will be "evil redneck Texas judge sides with Nazis." You watch.
I agree, if by "big hero speech" you mean "barely coherent rant about how everybody is a nazi and Mayer is Hitler".I'm placing my bets on him coming prepared with a "big hero speech" that he'll attempt to deliver for the record.
A painful financial settlement in Zack's favor will be very satisfying, but it's likely to be our only satisfaction. They will never admit Waid did wrong. The narrative will be "evil redneck Texas judge sides with Nazis." You watch.
But paranoid rants sound so much better in your head if you picture yourself as Superman, looking boldly out to the horizon as your cape flutters in the wind.I agree, if by "big hero speech" you mean "barely coherent rant about how everybody is a nazi and Mayer is Hitler".
But paranoid rants sound so much better in your head if you picture yourself as Superman, looking boldly out to the horizon as your cape flutters in the wind.![]()
Anyone got cliffnotes? my speakers are broken.
He just recaps the events, shows the precedent case for the tort claim and explains the lawsuit. No new info.Anyone got cliffnotes? my speakers are broken.
Is there anything new? The first post before that one is from two weeks agoHe just recaps the events, shows the precedent case for the tort claim and explains the lawsuit. No new info.
TL; DR Waid's pretty damn screwed because while previous tortious interference cases have judged in the favor of the defendant either because there was no previous contract to interfere with or the plaintiff was unable to prove malicious intent, Texas recognizes verbal/written agreements as legally binding so even if there was no "official" official contract between Meyer and AP their Twitter and previous statements about intending to publish Meyer fulfill the tort requirement of a legally binding contract and it's easy to prove Waid acted with malicious intent due to his previous history of behavior towards Meyer and because as he was dumb enough to state said malicious intent in the same post he claimed he'd struck down Meyer's contract.Anyone got cliffnotes? my speakers are broken.
Is there anything new? The first post before that one is from two weeks ago
The only thing New is some interesting analysis of the two other cases that I believe Waid’s lawyers sited, and why they apply less than Waid might hope.