Red Letter Media

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Favorite recurring character? (Select 4)

  • Jack / AIDSMobdy

    Votes: 257 24.0%
  • Josh / the Wizard

    Votes: 77 7.2%
  • Colin (Canadian #1)

    Votes: 460 42.9%
  • Jim (Canadian #2)

    Votes: 230 21.4%
  • Tim

    Votes: 386 36.0%
  • Len Kabasinski

    Votes: 208 19.4%
  • Freddie Williams

    Votes: 274 25.5%
  • Patton Oswalt

    Votes: 27 2.5%
  • Macaulay Culkin

    Votes: 541 50.4%
  • Max Landis

    Votes: 64 6.0%

  • Total voters
    1,073
actually he was married BEFORE the success. Ironically it was the success of Star Wars that led to his divorce.
That only makes it more confounding
How did this man snag a wife and how did he manage to fumble the bag?

Was the Gamecube really that disliked? I may be biased but I recall it being received pretty favourably (if not able to stand up to the PS2 juggernaut and XBOX's amazing online) and it was a mainstay of "beloved underrated console" discussion for ages alongside the Dreamcast.
At the risk of going further off-topic it was very much maligned, there's a reason the PS2 and Xbox ate its lunch that generation, and it plus the Wii essentially cost Nintendo the graphics-obsessed gamer market, which worked out for them fine but also empowered Microsoft.
The only company who had a harder time during that console generation was Sega, who never tried again, it went so bad for them.
 
I mean... technically movies are "made" in the edit. That's what the point of editing is. Every good movie is saved in editing. It's like saying "eating food saves people."
Well, yeah, no shit. But when people say the movie was "saved in the edit", the clear implication is that the editing is the one thing that carries it. Not the cinematography, storytelling, acting, sound design, special effects etc.
It's an attempt to give George Lucas as little credit as possible for the success of Star Wars, from people who are upset about how he dropped the ball later on.
 
Well, yeah, no shit. But when people say the movie was "saved in the edit", the clear implication is that the editing is the one thing that carries it. Not the cinematography, storytelling, acting, sound design, special effects etc.
It's an attempt to give George Lucas as little credit as possible for the success of Star Wars, from people who are upset about how he dropped the ball later on.

It might also be shorthand for "Lucas's edit was horrible; the subsequent edits saved it." This has certainly been true of other films, though I have no idea if it was true of Star Wars.
 
the Gamecube was bemoaned as a mostly useless machine that was only good for Smash Bros. and Metroid Prime at the time
Tales of Symphonia was kinda nice
Was the Gamecube really that disliked? I may be biased but I recall it being received pretty favourably (if not able to stand up to the PS2 juggernaut and XBOX's amazing online) and it was a mainstay of "beloved underrated console" discussion for ages alongside the Dreamcast.
The cube had it's fans during the day, but it sold 23 million against the PS2's 150 million and that permanently labeled it as the purple lunchbox for your autistic cousin. There were some incredible games on the system that have stood the test of time, but the amount of those compared to the shovelware isn't the best.
actually he was married BEFORE the success. Ironically it was the success of Star Wars that led to his divorce.
How the fuck did she walk away from that kind of money, knowing that sequels were inevitable?
 
Nah man, Gen X ruined a ton of shit and every time someone starts talking shit about them they blame boomers.

There is some weird fixation here that "I didn't like the film" -> "The film was objectively bad". Maybe decades of RottenTomatoes brainrotted people that mid films can't be divisive. And as far as general audience was concerned, the prequels were perfectly serviceable, with only the first one having some pushback due to Jar Jar and that was dialed down in the sequels.
I wanted to check my memory on this, and every article I've come across confirms what I remember: the boomer as a meme [not nec. as a real generation] has been dunked on since c. 2019 by millennials and gen z. Gen x was so small that they didn't do much except wear plaid, but were usu. smart enough not to get dishwasher tattoos.
 
Was the Gamecube really that disliked? I may be biased but I recall it being received pretty favourably (if not able to stand up to the PS2 juggernaut and XBOX's amazing online) and it was a mainstay of "beloved underrated console" discussion for ages alongside the Dreamcast.
Assorted things I personally remember:
  • Super Mario Sunshine had mixed reception
  • Zelda: Wind Waker was negatively received when it was unveiled because the bright and colorful cartoony tone clashed with everything that came before, plus it came out right when general western pop culture was in a place that was a polar opposite of bright and colorful
  • no L button
  • Animal Crossing was pretty popular, but among its own audience
  • no Rockstar Games at all when they were at their peak
  • no DDR at its peak aside from one full of Mario songs, nor any rhythm games except for a tiny selection that weren't very good
I see Gamecube spoken of well today, but the only two games that seem to have survived the ages as universally well-regarded are Smash Bros. Melee and Metroid Prime. Wind Waker seems to be well respected, too, except for the sailing. I don't know, I personally played Wind Waker for about an hour and hated it. Nice job sticking a zero-fun stealth section right at the beginning of the game that just sucks out whatever energy and motivation I had going in.

At the risk of going further off-topic it was very much maligned, there's a reason the PS2 and Xbox ate its lunch that generation, and it plus the Wii essentially cost Nintendo the graphics-obsessed gamer market, which worked out for them fine but also empowered Microsoft.
The only company who had a harder time during that console generation was Sega, who never tried again, it went so bad for them.
Yes, exactly. Gamecube, ironically, had some of the best graphics that generation, but it didn't matter at a time when realism was the big buzzword. Super Mario Sunshine looks terrific and graphically aged extremely well, but that game didn't feature textures where you could see every single little pore in a normal human's face, so nobody cared.

The common thread between Gamecube and the Star Wars prequel trilogy is that they both seem to be loved by zoomers, because they grew up with them. I only saw Episode 1 once, and I was still very young, but even I can't remember much about it. I must not have enjoyed it all that much, because I know I didn't care about Star Wars after that. It didn't completely put me off of the franchise, but I was no longer intrigued when I saw the logo, or heard news about Episode 2. In fact, I don't remember much hype about Episode 2 at all. I don't really remember anything about Episode 2. I don't remember any of my friends talking about it at the time, and I don't remember any specific advertisements. It just seemed to have come and gone.

So I decided to look up merch on Google Images for Episode 2, just to see if anything could jog my memory, and I found out that only one tie-in game came out for it. It's a Game Boy Advance game that had very bad reviews. Game Informer, which is Gamestop's in-house advertisement magazine, gave it a 1/10. That's dismal. Nothing jogged my memory, by the way.

I think Episode 3 was the best received out of the originals, even though it boils down to yet another schlocky action movie. I don't remember a lot of discussion surrounding it, either, other than apprehension about the franchise going forward based on that corny NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO thing. That seemed to be the prime takeaway from that entire film.

Also, "NOOOOOOOOOO" being translated as "Do not want" on a bootleg copy floating around became a meme in and of itself:
1722197136250.png

Seeing people actually defend these and cope with excuses when others say they're bad is one of those situations that makes me feel like I did switch universes back in 2012. Like, the prequels weren't total cancer, but they weren't good movies, and there were times when you couldn't get away from people mocking Jar Jar Binks and NOOOOOOOOOOO online.
 
I wanted to check my memory on this, and every article I've come across confirms what I remember: the boomer as a meme [not nec. as a real generation] has been dunked on since c. 2019 by millennials and gen z. Gen x was so small that they didn't do much except wear plaid, but were usu. smart enough not to get dishwasher tattoos.
Because everyone thinks they're the cool, smart generation.

See? They hate us 'cause they ain't us.
 
It might also be shorthand for "Lucas's edit was horrible; the subsequent edits saved it." This has certainly been true of other films, though I have no idea if it was true of Star Wars.
From a few deleted scenes I have seen leaked from a New Hope, it seems like a lot of very meandering pointless exposition scenes that we got to enjoy all the time in the prequel trilogy were in his edit of ANH. They got stripped out. He re-inserted the one of Han and Jabba the Hutt in the docking bay that's in the special edition.
 
He re-inserted the one of Han and Jabba the Hutt in the docking bay that's in the special edition.

A scene which, other than introducing Jabba the Hutt, is utterly pointless because all it does is repeat everything you just heard in the cantina scene with Greedo. It's a great example of a scene which belonged on the cutting room floor, not just because it's repetitive but because Jabba is so much more impressive if you only hear about him before seeing him in his palace in Jedi.
 
I enjoy the original Star Wars movies, although I wasn't around when they were released. I was older when the prequels came out and had a bit more understanding of narrative, etc. Looking back at them, there is some stuff that's pretty cheesy or hokey (particularly Return of the Jedi) when looking at it from an older perspective.

I really didn't like the Phantom Menace. I remember there was some weird cardboard button promotion thing (kind of like McDonald's Monopoly) that I think...Pizza Hut? was doing and it was just all these British actors (the one I remember is Ric Olie) and it just looked boring when looking at it out of context. Plus Jar Jar and Jake Lloyd didn't help things.

I'll admit that my expectations were contorted thanks to stuff I did enjoy (many of the PC games, the Zahn novels, etc.) but even accounting for that, there was some objectively terrible shit in the prequels that didn't work.
 
How the fuck did she walk away from that kind of money, knowing that sequels were inevitable?
Their divorce was in '83. Pretty much after the sequels were done.

But it's also a testament to how much strain running a spontaneous empire put on their relationship. A lot of people think running things is all fun and games, that you can be idlily rich - but it's not. It's a lot of work and stress to keep stuff going. You don't get time off. (That's what made stuff like 50 shades of grey so ironically entertaining because in real life, there's no way a guy as successful as the main dude is going to have the time to mess with the main character that he does. She is - at best - going to get to see him for like 4 hours a week.)

(there was also some apparent stress that Marsha wanted kids and George is apparently infertile)

1722198633308.png

Still, the dude did alright for a time. Man should be an inspiration to spergs everywhere.
 
Was the Gamecube really that disliked? I may be biased but I recall it being received pretty favourably (if not able to stand up to the PS2 juggernaut and XBOX's amazing online) and it was a mainstay of "beloved underrated console" discussion for ages alongside the Dreamcast.
Gamecube was considered underpowered in its day, and as others said, came about when realism was the buzz, so it had trouble finding its niche. PS2 was out for years longer and functioned as a DVD player, OG Xbox had raw hardware on its side, and Gamecube had the tiny optical disc, so all it could do was play first (and technically some third) party games.
Also, I found the Gamecube controller overrated. The C stick was not as easy to aim with like the left analog stick and was closer to the C buttons on the N64. I just remember using it as smash hotkeys when playing Melee. It did have paddle triggers, which we wouldn't see for another generation. It's just one of those experiments that Nintendo does that had mixed results.
There is a reason why the Switch Pro controller is essentially an Xbox controller and it's because the ergonomic question has been settled for some time.
 
How many big blockbuster movies have they covered soon after they came out recently? Feels like the first one in a while.

Watching it, I don’t think their point about the Star Wars vs Marvel fandoms is quite the point they think it is. For one, a lot of people hate Star Wars now and wouldn’t care either way about a full dark man child comedy movie that takes the piss out of the franchise, for another if like a Captain America movie had Deadpool level inside jokes and fourth wall breaking it would piss the Marvel fans off too.
 
Last edited:
I can't believe they liked it and gave it a pretty good endorsement. I'm legit tempted to unsubscribe. Seriously. The last BoTW was trash and I didn't even finish it. It was that unmotivated and boring. I'm just kind of befuddled by their bizarro takes.

Now, I'd give Deadpool 3/Wolverine a 6.5 out of 10. Okay, they didn't say it was the greatest thing ever but the first good blockbuster? Really? I had quite a few issues with it:

Firstly, I did laugh more than a few times. Maybe 6-7 times and a couple of smiles. That's about it.

The action and gore was overall good.

Reynolds and Jackman play off each other very well.

The problem is the MCU shit. It was an unending series of memberberry/fanservice bullshit. It's like, "Member Chris Evans as Human Torch?! 'Member Wesley Snipes as Blade?!?" The pandering was so desperate and some of the cameos I didn't recognize. I didn't recognize Channing Tatum as Gambit at first, he's aged out of the role. I didn't recognize Chris Evans or Henry Cavill either.

The overall idea of incorporating the multiverse and Deadpool falls into the Fox Marvel movie timeline was a good idea. Except the fact that Blade was owned by New Line/Warner Bros. but I digress. But the plot is a clusterfuck. Nothing makes any sense. Practically no one has motivation to do what they're doing. The bad guy is just evil because niggers and it's a bad guy just plucked out of thin air. I hate to be a nerd about this but the bad guy is Professor X's female twin. A character never established in anything except maybe some obscure comic somewhere? Why not Professor X's son Legion who was established in his own show (that I heard good things about but I couldn't get into it)? Or maybe go with Onslaught for comic nerd points? Why create practically a brand new character other than for woke points?

It's also really overlong. It felt like it ended at the 90 minute mark but it kept going in what felt like studio-demanded reshoots to bring on more multiverse Deadpools and the villain is trying to blow up all the multiverses because niggers.

It's a mediocre background noise movie. Nothing more than that.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom