Some more Josh updates,
His lawyer is trying to say that because Josh was not formally involved with the authorities and wasn't charged for molesting that it is possible it didn't happen. So therefore, if it's possible it didn't happen , then it should be treated that way (prolly that whole innocent until proven guilty thing) and therefore anything molestation related,like the police report that was made after authorities came to talk to them and Jobboob admitted it happened, and the friend cop (who then went to prison for chez pizza) who he confessed it to, and gave Josh a "stern talk".
View attachment 2723252
JOSH Duggar’s lawyers claimed he may not have molested five young girls as a teenager despite confessing and apologizing for the horrific incident in 2015. Josh, 33, is just weeks away from his Nov…
www.the-sun.com
Ummm.. he made a statement admitting to it, well, kinda, really just confessed to bad choices in his youth and that it could lead him down the wrong path, or some nonsense.
The sisters are still suing over the records being made public . The state tried to get it thrown out as "the exact same thing Josh sued for" but the judge was like um no, their case is different, they are the victims and not the perpetrator so their case can continue moving forward I guess.
He also had daisy's destruction which features a toddler male.
I still think US District Judge Christy Comstock should be recalled. Josh should not have been granted bail or access to Any of his children, supervised or nite due to the nature of charges and the specific files he downloaded.
I won't derail the thread with bail and how unfair/racist/classist/whatever other reasons for it being whack but clearly Josh is getting treated special, let's be real. If it were anyone else , prolly not have gotten bail. Even with a clean record like josh . The nature of what he downloaded is reason alone not to give it to him.
Scott Reisch of Crimetalk, (a practicing defense atty of over 20yrs explains the law and law processes etc) has done multiple segments of his show on Josh Duggar. Just the other day he did a great job if explaining why it is on the state to prove their case (and not the other way around) beyond a reasonable doubt, and why innocent until proven guilty is so impt. I don't disagree with you, I mean yes it's semantics but if you truly believe in the legal system and due process and being able to state your case in a public forum , then yea.
(Scott has also done some short segments of the most impt legal parts of the Kenosha kyle trial. He started his channel during the cjris watts trial because the way the trial parts happened and what they were called was very confusing, and the media weren't doing a great job explaining, so he started to just explain in simple terms what stuff meant, or typically what XYZ motion means, in terms us plebs can understand)
(he also has a dumb criminal every day and then a winner of the dumb criminal of the week winner, some funny shit, and he ll even make fun of obvious schizo mental cases or Downeys, whatever, like dude ain't PC, he doesn't sugarcoat)