- Joined
- Jan 14, 2019
Now you shown that the Popes contradicted each other on Fetuses. I am now having a spiritual crisis as this affects the doctrine of papal infallibility. Do you know if there are Catholic explanations about the Pope's contradictions?
I'll have a look and see if there's something like that available free online, it is expensive getting hard copies of things like Infallible?
The basic thrust of the counter-argument from Catholics is that "It wasn't really taught to the whole Church" or "The Pope wasn't speaking ex-cathedra". Now the problem here is, as highlighted, nobody can actually ascertain when a Pope (if he does have supernatural Charisma) is speaking Infalliably, they can only ascertain afterwards from contradiction where he wasn't.
This does open some fairly interesting possibilities, as while John Paul II did say "We declare and define" in regard to female clergy, a later pontiff can quite easily decide otherwise. It will be harder to backtrack in the modern era where thanks to the internet it's much easier to check archives of times the Chuch has u-turned (before it could just lie because 99% of the time it had all the evidence in its possession) but I personally suspect that's why he was advised to say "The Church does not have the authority". Doesn't that strike you as an odd thing for a Pope to say? The direct voice of God on Earth to whom was given the keys to bind on earth as it will be in heaven saying he doesn't have the authority when his glorious predecessors like Innocent III have proclaimed themselves Lord of the Temporal Realm (i.e: The Universe)? I think given another century or so people will decide John Paul II wasn't speaking ex-cathedra as they've since decided previous condemnation of Natural Family Planning (i.e: The rhythm method for normies, just with more vaginal mucus sniffing) in Castii Connubi wasn't.
While I'm usually loathed to quote other religious studies, the Watchtower association comissioned a study of the beliefs of European Catholics back in 1989 in Awake (they wanted to work out the best way to convert them) and discovered....
This doctrine has divided people. In 1982, in the city of Rome, the home of the Vatican, 57 percent of Catholics considered papal infallibility one of the most questionable of dogmas. In Portugal, only 54.6 percent of Catholics believe in it, and in Spain, only 37 percent.
Groups like WomenPriests, Catholics for Choice, the University of Tubingen (where Fr.Kung lectured) have been openly poo-pooing infalliability for years (in cases like the "Old Catholic Church" they've been doing it since Vatican I) and still consider themselves Catholic with no internal turmoil or spiritual crises. People who describe themselves as "Catholics" without infalliability mostly function as a more centralised Eastern Orthodox.
Serious reply.
Visit Ann Barnhardt at www.barnhardt.biz and on the header is a link to a +2 hour video explaining that Heresiarch Jorge the Humble is not the real pople (and B16 is... while he's still alive, that is).
Don't get him started on this. Sedevacantism is a hell of a drug.
I still get letters to my old official email every two or three days from this one fruitcake who believes the last Pope was Pius XII who's still alive in cryosleep awaiting the day he rises to have a fucking battle with the giant whore and dragon in revelation in some Shadow of the Collosus tier shit. Mel Gibson is considered a moderate if that's any clue to what some of them are like.