Proof that Catholicism is true

  • Thread starter Thread starter MW 590
  • Start date Start date
  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I lost my faith on February 7 as shown by the earlier comments here. If you check my profile, you will see that I mentioned that fact in February 13. However when I posted on Reddit, I hid that information in an attempt to get devout Catholics to join my cause to restore the true heir to the throne of England.
Work on your faith you hethen.
 
Work on your faith you hethen.
I wish that I could get it back. I am writing a Catholic end times story where my society successfully infiltrates England, restores the rightful rulers, and there is a great king on the throne. He is given Excalibur, restores the Knights of the Round Table, and successfully liberates Constantinople and Jerusalem. If I was still Catholic, the story could inspire Catholics to join my cause. I will attempt to reconvert by doing research on whether Pope Gregory XIV's bull Sedes Apostolicae is real or a forgery.
 
I wish that I could get it back. I am writing a Catholic end times story where my society successfully infiltrates England, restores the rightful rulers, and there is a great king on the throne. He is given Excalibur, restores the Knights of the Round Table, and successfully liberates Constantinople and Jerusalem. If I was still Catholic, the story could inspire Catholics to join my cause. I will attempt to reconvert by doing research on whether Pope Gregory XIV's bull Sedes Apostolicae is real or a forgery.
Your monomania is adorable.
 
I wish that I could get it back. I am writing a Catholic end times story where my society successfully infiltrates England, restores the rightful rulers, and there is a great king on the throne. He is given Excalibur, restores the Knights of the Round Table, and successfully liberates Constantinople and Jerusalem. If I was still Catholic, the story could inspire Catholics to join my cause. I will attempt to reconvert by doing research on whether Pope Gregory XIV's bull Sedes Apostolicae is real or a forgery.
This story makes you look like a lunatic, and fixating on it will only prolong your suffering.
 
This story makes you look like a lunatic, and fixating on it will only prolong your suffering.
Well I recently converted back to Catholicism so now I have confidence that Catholics will want to join my cause after reading my end times story knowing that I am Catholic. It will become as popular among Catholics as the Left Behind series is among Protestants.

On Catholic Answers, I asked about the issue of the Pope's contradicting each other on fetuses and someone gave an excellent answer that caused me to convert back to Catholicism.
These bulls prescribed different ecclesiastical penalties for abortion–they weren’t definitive judgments about a point of morals. Gregory XIV provided lesser penalties for the abortion of an “unanimated” fetus than for an “animated” one, but neither acts were considered morally upright at any time by the Church.

The Church in principle has always taught that both contraception and murder are contrary to the divine and natural law. However, there is no infallibility when it comes to scientific facts. In this case, whether a particular concrete act is one or the other is a question of factual circumstances, not a question of moral principles. Before there is a new life, it would be an act of contraception; after a new life has been created, it would be an act of murder. The mechanics of conception, however, is a scientific fact. The principles are fixed, even if our knowledge of scientific facts to which we apply the principles can be improved.
So now that I am Catholic again, I now think that my plans for England are going to fulfill end times prophecy. Here is my current plan for England.
I now did further research of the Kings of England and discovered something.

When Edward III issued Letters Patent, restricting the crown to those in the male line, it made no provision for females inheriting upon extinction of the male line.

As I said before, Richard II modified the entail to exclude his cousin Henry of Bolingbroke from the throne because Henry was once part of the rebel group called the Lords Appellant. His uncle Edmund was therefore the next in line, but Edmund and his son Edward forfeited their rights when they betrayed Richard and joined Henry’s usurpation of the throne.

Therefore, after Richard was murdered, there was no legitimate male-line heir to the throne so ever since then, England has no monarchy De jure.

However, there are rightful heirs to other titles of nobility who have been deprived of their titles. A good example are the descendants of Thomas le Despenser who was made Earl of Gloucester by Richard II but was attainted by the false king Henry IV because of his role in the righteous execution of Richard’s treasonous uncle Thomas.

So my society plans to restore all the rightful heirs to the English nobility. Then the heirs to the parliament under Richard II can choose what form of government England will be. If they choose to have the House of Windsor to be the reigning dynasty, then I will finally accept them as legitimate. However they are not the legitimate heirs to Scotland so my society will give Scotland independence and restore the true heir to the Scottish throne.
In order to coerce the monarch of the UK into giving royal assent to such a bill, the other European governments will need to be infiltrated by my society as well to make him or her do it under threat of invasion by the other European countries. As a side effect, my society will restore other fallen European monarchies such as France. The European kingdoms can elect a Holy Roman Emperor over them who will be the Great Monarch of Catholic prophecy who will liberate Constantinople and the Holy Land.
 
Like someone or some group who joined a community and fucked it up, a person or group who joins a religion and changes it from its original concept. The homosexual mafia and Pagans messed with it to their liking.
It can’t always be someone else’s fault. This is like @Bleachedanoos blaming it on the Jews (wonder what happened to him, anyway?)
 
It can’t always be someone else’s fault. This is like @Bleachedanoos blaming it on the Jews (wonder what happened to him, anyway?)
How some people recognized a group of people are by the individuals who join it. The reason why Atheists always say that all religions are actually for "muh pedophiles" because of the history of leaders and followers of these religions.
 
Well I recently converted back to Catholicism so now I have confidence that Catholics will want to join my cause after reading my end times story knowing that I am Catholic. It will become as popular among Catholics as the Left Behind series is among Protestants.

On Catholic Answers, I asked about the issue of the Pope's contradicting each other on fetuses and someone gave an excellent answer that caused me to convert back to Catholicism.

So now that I am Catholic again, I now think that my plans for England are going to fulfill end times prophecy. Here is my current plan for England.

In order to coerce the monarch of the UK into giving royal assent to such a bill, the other European governments will need to be infiltrated by my society as well to make him or her do it under threat of invasion by the other European countries. As a side effect, my society will restore other fallen European monarchies such as France. The European kingdoms can elect a Holy Roman Emperor over them who will be the Great Monarch of Catholic prophecy who will liberate Constantinople and the Holy Land.
1. I'm Catholic, and what you're endorsing is entirely unCatholic, and the fact of this would be obvious to you if you were serious about theology. All mortal rulers are transient and meaningless; there is no "God-appointed line".
2. You blaspheme against Christ's own words: "Amen, I say unto you: none shall know the day nor the hour that the Son of Man shall come down from Heaven". So whose words are right: your's, or those of the Christ?
3. You also blaspheme in attempting to enact the eschaton: it shall be enacted when God decrees, not man.
4. Again, you blaspheme: how would your acts bring about Armageddon? Unless you believe your reinstated monarchical system shall be the Beast With Seven Heads, or the Beast in the Guise of the Lamb. Or unless you believe you are the Son of Man come down from Heaven to unite all the Christian people into one nation, in which case you are a blasphemer unto the utmost degree.
 
1. I'm Catholic, and what you're endorsing is entirely unCatholic, and the fact of this would be obvious to you if you were serious about theology. All mortal rulers are transient and meaningless; there is no "God-appointed line".
2. You blaspheme against Christ's own words: "Amen, I say unto you: none shall know the day nor the hour that the Son of Man shall come down from Heaven". So whose words are right: your's, or those of the Christ?
3. You also blaspheme in attempting to enact the eschaton: it shall be enacted when God decrees, not man.
4. Again, you blaspheme: how would your acts bring about Armageddon? Unless you believe your reinstated monarchical system shall be the Beast With Seven Heads, or the Beast in the Guise of the Lamb. Or unless you believe you are the Son of Man come down from Heaven to unite all the Christian people into one nation, in which case you are a blasphemer unto the utmost degree.
1. In the Middle Ages, it was believed that monarchs ruled by the grace of God. That is supported by 1 Peter 2:13-17.
2. I never said that I know the exact day Christ will return. It will happen sometime after the Antichrist is slain by St. Michael the Archangel and according to Catholic prophecy, the Antichrist will come after the death of the Great Monarch. I never assigned a definite date when those events will occur.
3. And I believe that God is decreeing right now that it should be enacted and that I should help enact it just like he decreed that Joan of Arc enact the prophecy of the virgin that would save France.
4. It is Catholic prophecy that before the Antichrist, there will be a Great Monarch who will bring an era of peace. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Last_Roman_Emperor
 
1. In the Middle Ages, it was believed that monarchs ruled by the grace of God. That is supported by 1 Peter 2:13-17.
2. I never said that I know the exact day Christ will return. It will happen sometime after the Antichrist is slain by St. Michael the Archangel and according to Catholic prophecy, the Antichrist will come after the death of the Great Monarch. I never assigned a definite date when those events will occur.
3. And I believe that God is decreeing right now that it should be enacted and that I should help enact it just like he decreed that Joan of Arc enact the prophecy of the virgin that would save France.
4. It is Catholic prophecy that before the Antichrist, there will be a Great Monarch who will bring an era of peace. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Last_Roman_Emperor
So you are claiming direct revelation from God? That God has spoken unto you directly, or through the intercession of the angels and saints, and charged you with this? Every one prophesied was given their charge by God or an intercessory, save the Christ for obvious reasons.
 
So you are claiming direct revelation from God? That God has spoken unto you directly, or through the intercession of the angels and saints, and charged you with this? Every one prophesied was given their charge by God or an intercessory, save the Christ for obvious reasons.
The fact that I will fulfill prophecy was put into my mind by either God or my guardian angel.
 
The fact that I will fulfill prophecy was put into my mind by either God or my guardian angel.
All prophets and those prophesied had their status announced to them. The idea wasn't "put into their head": the Saints came before them, or an angel manifested themselves before them, shod with flames and crowned by the sun. What would make you different?
EDIT: And furthermore, if you believe your installed monarch would be the Last Good Emperor, why would you refuse to live under his reign, and instead live in this Godless land?
 
All prophets and those prophesied had their status announced to them. The idea wasn't "put into their head": the Saints came before them, or an angel manifested themselves before them, shod with flames and crowned by the sun. What would make you different?
EDIT: And furthermore, if you believe your installed monarch would be the Last Good Emperor, why would you refuse to live under his reign, and instead live in this Godless land?
Nostradamus didn't claim to have a direct visitation by angels or saints when he made his predictions that later came true so he too had it put in his head. And I probably will move to England when the Great Monarch is put on the throne.
 
Nostradamus didn't claim to have a direct visitation by angels or saints when he made his predictions that later came true so he too had it put in his head. And I probably will move to England when the Great Monarch is put on the throne.
1.Nostradamus didn't consider himself a prophet: his works were mostly compilations of alleged revelations from God by the saints and the more ambitious claims of necromancers. You are ignorant of Nostradamus.
2. The methods by which he made his personal predictions were heretical: astrology is a kind of divination, and therefore is witchcraft and an abomination. Necromancy is even worse. To say Nostradamus was a prophet and cite him for your own motive is to endorse the use of the Devil's tools and to proclaim your allegiance as belonging to Satan. If you have any true dedication to the Church, you will recant your blasphemies in this manner.
3. Many of his prophecies are so steeped in vague symbolism that they can be interpreted to mean anything: this is a common tool of charlatans and Satan both, to delude. True prophecy, as charged by God, is clear. Joan of Arc was told by the saints that she would liberate France, and so she did.
4. With this established, I again ask you: did the angels or saints come before you with a vision?
 
1.Nostradamus didn't consider himself a prophet: his works were mostly compilations of alleged revelations from God by the saints and the more ambitious claims of necromancers. You are ignorant of Nostradamus.
2. The methods by which he made his personal predictions were heretical: astrology is a kind of divination, and therefore is witchcraft and an abomination. Necromancy is even worse. To say Nostradamus was a prophet and cite him for your own motive is to endorse the use of the Devil's tools and to proclaim your allegiance as belonging to Satan. If you have any true dedication to the Church, you will recant your blasphemies in this manner.
3. Many of his prophecies are so steeped in vague symbolism that they can be interpreted to mean anything: this is a common tool of charlatans and Satan both, to delude. True prophecy, as charged by God, is clear. Joan of Arc was told by the saints that she would liberate France, and so she did.
4. With this established, I again ask you: did the angels or saints come before you with a vision?
1. I'll do more research on Nostradamus but it seems like the accusations of witchcraft come from Protestants.
2. A Christian practice that can be used for divine revelation is mysticism which ranges from ecstatic vision to simple religious contemplation which was what I was doing when I realized that I am going to fulfill end times prophecy.
 
1. I'll do more research on Nostradamus but it seems like the accusations of witchcraft come from Protestants.
2. A Christian practice that can be used for divine revelation is mysticism which ranges from ecstatic vision to simple religious contemplation which was what I was doing when I realized that I am going to fulfill end times prophecy.
1. The man engaged in astrology, self-professed. Read his own letters. Reading omens in the sky is one of the specific biblical definitions of witchcraft. Just because a Protestant accuses someone of sin doesn't mean they are blameless. Use the brain God gave you for once.
2. Not all things you think in contemplation are true: indeed, in contemplation myself I have often faced my inner demons masquerading as angels. Revelation is always, in every record of saint and prophet, vouchsafed in ecstatic vision, or accompanied by a miracle. I defy you to find a record that contradicts this.
3. With this, once more I say unto you: testify to the mark that shows this is divine revelation, and not the echo of your ego off the back of your skull, or a seductive vision from the Prince of Lies.
 
1. The man engaged in astrology, self-professed. Read his own letters. Reading omens in the sky is one of the specific biblical definitions of witchcraft. Just because a Protestant accuses someone of sin doesn't mean they are blameless. Use the brain God gave you for once.
2. Not all things you think in contemplation are true: indeed, in contemplation myself I have often faced my inner demons masquerading as angels. Revelation is always, in every record of saint and prophet, vouchsafed in ecstatic vision, or accompanied by a miracle. I defy you to find a record that contradicts this.
3. With this, once more I say unto you: testify to the mark that shows this is divine revelation, and not the echo of your ego off the back of your skull, or a seductive vision from the Prince of Lies.
1. You made a good point about Nostradamus.
2. I will ask if revelation is always given in ecstatic vision or accompanied by a miracle on Catholic Answers in order to see if I had divine revelation. What is true according to revelation experienced by many mystics is that regardless of whether my plans work or not, eventually there will be an era of prosperity for the Church where rightful Catholic monarchy in England and Europe will be restored since there will be a Last Roman Emperor ruling over the monarchs of Europe.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top Bottom